Alex Ross – “Fascinating Rhythm: Celebrating Steve Reich” (2006)

September 30, 2009 at 8:12 pm (Music, Reviews & Articles)

This piece comes from The New Yorker, Nov. 13, 2006, on celebrated minimalist composer Steve Reich. He started out making truly mind-bending compositions using tapes & phasing techniques back in the mid-60s. His “Come Out” and “It’s Gonna Rain” are highly recommended, and early examples of phasing. By the end of each piece, your mind is truly fried. Without trying to be psychedelic, these compositions, using only the human voice, are like an acid trip in sound…

 

The other day, I watched as Steve Reich walked away from Carnegie Hall, where celebrations of his seventieth birthday were under way, and out into his native city. Trim and brisk, he darted into West Fifty-seventh Street, fell back before oncoming traffic, bopped impatiently in place, then darted forth again. He soon disappeared into the mass of people, his signature black cap floating above the crowd. Perhaps I should have lamented the fact that one of the greatest living composers was moving around New York unnoticed, but lamentation is not a Reichian state of mind, and I thought instead about how his work has blended into the cultural landscape, its repeating patterns and chiming timbres detectable all over modern music. Brian Eno, David Bowie, David Byrne, and a thousand d.j.s have paid him heed. On Fifty-seventh Street, Reich-inflected sounds may have been coursing through the headphones of a few oblivious passersby.

Three decades ago, New York’s leading institutions would have nothing to do with Reich. A riot broke out when Michael Tilson Thomas presented “Four Organs” at Carnegie in 1973: one woman tried to stop the concert by banging on the edge of the stage with her shoe. Now uptown is lionizing the longtime renegade. His birthday fell on October 3rd, and, in the ensuing weeks, Carnegie joined ranks with three other organizations to present a citywide festival. BAM began, with a program of Reich dances, choreographed by Anne Teresa de Keersmaeker and Akram Khan. Then the Whitney hosted a four-hour marathon, ranging from the eruptive “It’s Gonna Rain” (1965) to the medievally pure “Proverb” (1995). Carnegie took up the baton with a four-day weekend of concerts, including Reich’s most recent composition, “Daniel Variations,” written in memory of the slain journalist Daniel Pearl. Lincoln Center finished, with “You Are (Variations),” “Tehillim,” and “The Cave.”

The central event was a grand concert at Carnegie. Pat Metheny played “Electric Counterpoint,” the Kronos Quartet played “Different Trains,” and Steve Reich and Musicians played “Music for 18 Musicians.” The last is often pronounced Reich’s masterpiece, and on this occasion, swathed in Carnegie’s reverberant acoustics, it unfolded like a dreamscape, its piano and percussion pulses dissolving in a blur, its attenuated melodies shimmering in a haze of resonances, its rich chords suspended for long moments. At one point, the composer walked away from his piano and stood for a moment in a corner, watching his thirty-year-old wonder unfold. As the scattered rock stars in the audience might have attested, you can’t get any cooler than that.

 

Reich’s eureka moment occurred in the mid-nineteen-sixties, when he was living in San Francisco. He had taped a street preacher named Brother Walter shouting “It’s gonna rain!” during a sermon on Noah and the Flood, and he looped those words on two tape recorders. When he pushed play on both machines, he found that one was running slightly faster than the other, so that the loops went out of sync. The machines began writing contrapuntal patterns in the air, an electronic canon for two raging voices.

The eighteen-minute tape composition that Reich extracted from this accident is ominously compelling in itself, but his masterstroke was to apply the going-out-of-phase trick to instrumental music, in “Piano Phase” (1967), for two pianos. I heard that simple, stunning piece three times last month: at BAM, in its original version; at the Whitney, in a version for two marimbas; and at Carnegie, in a version created by the percussionist David Cossin, who plays it on digital sound pads. (A video of Cossin playing the other part was superimposed, giving him a Vishnu-like, four-armed appearance.) The opening section uses only the notes E, F-sharp, B, C-sharp, and D, which, when run together in rapid patterns, suggest the key of B minor. Halfway in, the note A is added to the series, tilting the harmony toward A major. This small change never fails to have a brightening, energizing impact. Pieces like this can leave you happy for hours, like drugs without the mess.

“Piano Phase,” along with Terry Riley’s “In C” and Philip Glass’s “Music in Similar Motion,” marked a turning point. After a spell of avant-garde complexity, these young American composers were rediscovering the elements of music—a steady beat, tonal chords. Yet their work was absolutely modern, without nostalgia, without a trace of “neo” or “post.” In subsequent years, Reich kept pressing forward: in “Drumming,” he applied what he called “music as a gradual process” on a symphonic scale; in “Tehillim,” he blended his modern language with ancient Hebrew cantillation; and in “Different Trains” and the video operas “The Cave” and “Three Tales” he competed with hip-hop innovators in combining recorded samples with live music. To hear the majority of Reich’s work in a few weeks was to be amazed by the Stravinsky-like precision of his solutions to a wide array of musical problems. One issue he has never fully resolved, though, is how to present amplified music in traditional halls. The superb Los Angeles Master Chorale, in particular, was hampered by muddy sound in Alice Tully Hall.

In the most recent pieces—“You Are (Variations),” Variations for Vibes, Pianos, and Strings, “Daniel Variations”—Reich has consolidated four decades of invention. Neon-lit textures have given way to dense, dusky landscapes, with tender lyrical passages at the heart of each piece. It’s as if Reich were finally letting himself look back in time, perhaps even indulging a secret Romantic urge. Yet, in the tribute to Daniel Pearl, there is also a new influx of coiled power: fleets of pianos and percussion tap out telegraphic patterns, warning of the next big crash.

Alex Ross

Permalink Leave a Comment

Jim Morrison – “The Soft Parade”

September 30, 2009 at 8:04 pm (Jim Morrison, Poetry & Literature)

The soft parade has now begun on Sunset.
Cars come thundering down the canyon.
Now is the time & the place.
The cars come rumbling.
“You got a cool machine.”
These engine beasts
muttering their soft talk. A delightat
night to hear their quiet voices
again after 2 years. Now the soft parade
has soon begun.
Cool pools from a tired land
sink now in the peace of evening.
Clouds weaken & die.
The sun, an orange skull,
whispers quietly, becomes an
island, & is gone.There they are
watching us everything
will be dark. The light changed.
We were aware knee-deep in the fluttering air
as the ships move on trains in their wake.
Trench mouth again in the camps.
Gonorrhea. Tell the girl to go home
We need a witness to the killing.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Billy Altman – “Captain Beefheart Knows He’s a Man” (1979)

September 30, 2009 at 6:35 pm (Captain Beefheart, Reviews & Articles)

This article on Beefheart comes from the April 1979 issue of Creem magazine…

 

Don Van Vliet has just spent the last fifteen minutes wandering around the conference room at Warner Brothers’ New York headquarters, investigating the possibilities of undoing the corporate environment. He has painstakingly adjusted and readjusted the dimmer switch until the lighting in the room matches the twilight outside, and he has also managed to pry open one of those standard office building windows, the kind that no one who works in places like this ever even gets near for fear that if they do try and get some fresh air in, some alarm will ring and a team of security guards will haul them away (“Mr. Smith, why would you want to tamper with the scientifically designed heating and cooling system of this structure? I mean, you have a window to look out of, don’t you? Which is better than many other employees here. A window with which to see the building next door, where other people work hard all day for their firm, just as you should for yours. Why do you wish to spoil things, Mr. Smith? Perhaps a talk with the company psychologist . . .”).

The Captain finally sits down, the two of us engage in the ancient Beefheartian ritual of cigarette exchanging – Don’s eyes light up when he sees that I’ve got a pack of Chesterfields and I am ecstatic when a tin of Balkan Sobranies materializes out of his travel bag – but soon he is up again, moving towards a corner of the room where a cardboard cut-out of Shaun Cassidy is standing. Don’s eyes move up and down as he takes in Shaun’s toothy grin, the long scarf, the open necked shirt, the tight slacks. “Can you imagine?” he exclaims. “That kid has more money than all of us. Well, so what? He deserves it. You know what I mean?” And with that, he assumes a John L. Sullivan stance, bobs and weaves a bit, waits for the opening and lands a lightning quick solid right jab to Cassidy’s jaw. “I like this place,” he laughs. “You know what I mean?”

TO BILLY, LOVE OVER GOLD – DON VAN VLIET reads the inscription on the front cover of my copy of The Spotlight Kid, a memento of my first meeting with Captain Beefheart back in early ‘72. I’ve since seen him hand out autographs to admirers and give signed sketches to friends, and that little statement usually accompanies his signature. It is one of many phrases that Beefheart has graced the universe with over the years (“Earth – God’s golf ball, “”I’m not even here; I just stick around for my friends,” and “You can tell by the kindness of a dog how a human should be” are three other favorites), but in lieu of his unique relationship to both the world of music and the music industry itself (I hesitate to use the word “career,” since writing and playing music is just one of many things this man does brilliantly; if pressed, I’d have to say that his career is living and on that account, he’s got roughly ninety-nine percent of the rest of his race beat), it’s most assuredly the one that means the most. It has often been a struggle for him to do what he loves to do, and his refusal to be manipulated by the “accepted” rules and regulations of the music biz (x amount of records recorded during y amount of time; z number of tours per annum; etc.) has probably had a big hand in preventing him from becoming a household word, and has resulted in plenty of strange dealings with a number of record companies. But you wind up coming right back to that little slogan and it explains just about everything you’d need to know about Don Van Vliet.

“Beefheart freaks. I know the kind too well – ‘I just love Captain Beefheart. Wouldn’t want him over at the house, though!’”

The closest that Beefheart came towards trying it their way was towards the middle of the decade. In 1972 he’d given Warner Bros. Clear Spot, an album which, produced by Ted Templeman, was hoped to be the one to bring the Beefheart sound to a bigger than cult-sized audience. It didn’t happen, and after its commercial failure, Beefheart moved over to Mercury. 1974’s Unconditionally Guaranteed sported a cover showing him clutching dollar bills in each hand, with a mock warranty printed underneath the picture. One part stood out for me, though; it said: “Warning: Could be harmful to closed minds.” And so, even though the credits on the back were enough to let me know that something was indeed amiss here, what with producer Andy DiMartino getting not only co-arranging credit with Beefheart for all the songs but also co-credit for the songwriting, I gave the record a chance and was rewarded by an undeniably subdued, but nevertheless often captivating, set of songs. Ballads dominated here for the first time on a Beefheart album and odd time signatures were non-existent. But as I pointed out in my review of the record here in CREEM when it was released, ballads were certainly not without precedent in Beefheart land. Spotlight Kid has had them, as had Clear Spot, and I, for one, found no problem at all holding up songs like “Neon Meat Dream of a Octafish” and “Her Eyes Are a Blue Million Miles” side by side and enjoying the different glow from each of them.

Not much happened with the album, though, and Beefheart’s lone New York appearance that year proved to be one of the most depressing concerts I have ever attended in my life. The Magic Band had broken up shortly before this particular tour had begun and Beefheart, assembling what musicians he could under the circumstances, went through the tour like a man whose feet had been cut out from under him. The band tried hard to accompany Beefheart as best they could, but as he himself will tell you, it takes a lot of “unlearning” to play his music correctly. The audience that night was the kind that, unfortunately, I’d seen too many times at Captain Beefheart shows. Mostly Zappoids, coming doped up to see the ‘bizarre’ Beefheart be weird. They yelled and screamed throughout all the slow songs – and many grew hostile when it became clear that this wasn’t going to be an evening of Dadaist entertainment. I only made it through about half the set and finally I just became so overwhelmed by sadness that I had to leave.

“I own some land in California – as if anyone can own land – up north near the Oregon border; I think it’s a quarter of an acre or a third, I’m not really sure. All I need is a window looking on the ocean.”

A second Mercury album came out in ‘75 and to Beefheart it was the final straw. Entitled Bluejeans and Moonbeams, the record was mostly outtakes from the previous record and rough takes with instruments overdubbed. Beefheart didn’t want it released and it went out without his approval. Beefheart had suddenly disappeared and the company was going to make sure that he honored his contract, one way or another. Where he disappeared to was home in Northern California, where he and his lovely wife Jan simply went on with their life together – painting, writing, reading, loving, breathing.

In 1976, a new Magic Band started to get assembled and, as with the original Magic Band, it got pieced together slowly and without any real kind of search. The right players just started appearing. Jeff Tepper had met Beefheart years before and Beefheart had given him a drawing which Tepper had framed and put up on the wall of his house. The two of them met again and Tepper, a sensitive guitarist, began playing with Beefheart. Richard Redus, the other guitarist, was a visitor at Beefheart’s house during the recording of Trout Mask Replica (“We talked about the beautiful eucalyptus trees in Woodland Hills,” Beefheart recalls) and he joined the fold after a stint with Zappa. Drummer Robert Williams and bassist/keyboard player Eric Feldman formed the rhythm section, and the Magic Band was back in business.

Late in ‘77, the new band went on tour, performing a set of old and new songs. All skepticism that I may have had was wiped out as soon as I heard new songs, like “Floppy Boot Stomp and “Bat Chain Puller,” (or not only was Beefheart in amazing vocal form, considering his lengthy exile, but the band sounded completely attuned to the textural and rhythmic slants and turns of Beefheart’s decidedly singular muse. The Captain seemed more relaxed onstage than I’d ever seen him, and, when he finally took out his horn for “Veteran’s Day Poppy” and let loose that shrill shrieking cry of humanity, I knew all was well with the world. After a few months of negotiations, Beefheart had a new recording deal worked out with good old Warner Brothers.

“I’m totally happy with this album. I just had a blast, and I mean a blast, doing it. Glen Kolotkin, the engineer, is just brilliant. This is the first time you can hear my voice the way it really is. Glen did Stravinsky’s last record. I’ve always used my voice as an instrument but these people never realized that. What a job he did. When I heard ‘Bat Chain Puller’ it just knocked me down. He got my voice the way it is. You know what I mean?”

 

Shiny Beast (Bat Chain Puller) is an extraordinary achievement, considering both what Beefheart, has been through the last few years and the fact that the new Magic Band was put together basically from scratch. It’s perhaps the most well rounded Beefheart album ever, letting loose all facets of Beefheart’s extraordinary personality. One doesn’t hear much truly sensual music these days, and it’s a joy to hear “Tropical Hot Dog Night,” with its swirling melodies and counter melodies mustering up sweet jungle fever, and “Candle Mambo,” filled with such simple and beautiful imagery (When I’m dancing with my love/The shadows flicker up above/Up above the shadows do the candle mambo”). The album as a whole just soars and frolics, filled with humor and love. And with the addition of trombonist Bruce Fowler, the Magic Band’s sound takes on a whole new dimension. (“Is he too much?” laughs Beefheart. “Slide trombone and two slide guitars is it! You know what I mean?”).

“You know they’ve found a use for cockroaches and it’s pretty good. What it is is that they predict earthquakes by their behavior. Is that hip? I knew they were worth it. They are beautiful things.

If the new wave has been good for anything, it’s been the opening up again of various ways of expressing oneself musically and a break way from the creeping, emotionally deadening blandness 6f mainstream 70’s music. Don Van Vliet was new wave before there was a new wave, and he was playing fusion music before there was fusion music. Captain Beefheart is a person whose life and art are one and the same. Simply put, he is a man who is free. You know what I mean?  

 

Billy Altman 

Permalink Leave a Comment

Idris Walters – “Plastic Ono Band: The End of Another Dream” (1975)

September 28, 2009 at 12:24 am (John Lennon, Music, Reviews & Articles)

A 1975 article on John & Yoko & their conceptual “group” The Plastic Ono Band. Taken from Let It Rock magazine, February 1975… 

 

Idris Walters describes the strange marriage of rock’n'roll and conceptual art which produced some of the most arresting sounds of the last few years and ponders its demise.  

The Plastic Ono Band was a peculiar ritual. Plastic Ono Music probably dates back to John Lennon’s primal outpourings on ‘Twist and Shout’ during early Beatle-mania, but it took Yoko Ono and a Conceptual Art Notion or two to get it together. Whether carefully designed noise or contemporary folk music, Plastic Ono Music (POM) is singularly devastating. It is brutalist, functional music in the service of communal therapy. The coming together of a disillusioned Beatle and a disillusioned artist produced a proliferation of distinctive product. POM was (and remains) a deliberate attempt to make Something Different.

It was intended for mass consumption and had little to do with the Fellini Fall Out of elitist freakery. It was intended for everyone. For the musicians it was a release from the force fed mutancy of superstardom. For the market it was a circus act that didn’t quite come off, possibly because it abandoned applied decorative devices. A raw noise that left Beatle fans confused at the post but nonetheless a veritable explosion of creative activity in All the arts. Together POM represents a chunk of Body/Mind Music that could be made anywhere – a most improbable coagulation of talents.

John and Yoko even began to look alike for awhile. But now it seems to be over.

John Lennon is putting the finishing touches to his new album. He has been working extremely hard at the Record Plant studios on 44th Street in New York – a working race against the particular madness of the government of a country which, content to legalise treason (so long as it is committed by a President or a President’s man), is intent on deporting him. The lay-off-John-Lennon lobby is convincing enough but it seems like the original intention was to fix Yoko Ono rather than the man himself. Seems like they thought that by getting rid of John (on a pathetic historical dope charge) that Yoko would follow. The ridiculous part about it is that John and Yoko – a prolific combination of twentieth century creative talent – don’t seem to be hanging out together any more.

Plastic Ono Music is the aural output from the somewhat unholy alliance – six, maybe seven years old – between a lonely frustrated Beatle, Godhead or whatever, and a lonely, frustrated conceptual artist. They met over an avant-garde exhibition at the Robert Fraser Gallery in London. They came together publicly in celebration of their mutual understanding. They attempted to bring art, poetry, drama, even creative politics to John Lennon’s adopted audience in the first instance and then – to the world. Many will say that they failed, “but it was fun” – things like that. But the fact remains, the music remains and most people can clearly remember the special phenomenon of Plastic Ono Theatre. They haven’t failed yet. Musically – the coalition called the Plastic Ono Band – there were about a dozen albums (three doubles), a handful of singles, half a dozen remarkable live performances covering the widest possible range of musics – from the purgatory of an electronic wilderness to the devastating beauty of rock’n'roll (but I like it) carefully manipulated in the qualified hands of experts. But now, another dream is over for Lennon.

It’s ridiculous really, because the Plastic Ono Band never actually existed. It was always an idea, a concept more than a finite product. It changed within itself, reshuffled and shuffled again, adjusted its limitations according to the atmosphere of the moment. To describe the actual music needs an image. Plastic Ono Music (POM) is a white space at the end of The Last Horror Movie. To get into POM you need to be alone with noise enclosed in space, you need a feeling for rock’n'roll in the past, you need the realities of pain in the present and you need to abandon all conjectural premonitions on the future. POM – at its source – is not really rock’n'roll. It just sounds like it sometimes. It uses rock as a reference for communicative purposes.

POM is very nearly subversive. It is spare, rare, spiritual, hard edged, subliminal noise – sometimes ordered, sometimes not. Music has always been organised noise with intent to communicate or express. Chaos can be expressed legitimately by recourse to clear packaging – beginnings and endings. Music is best when the receiver is as good as the transmitter. POM is a unique music. It transmits something of the agony, of the ecstasy of today’s corporate madness.

POM is realist music – a phenomenon not dissimilar to contemporary realist painting. Somebody – probably McLuhan – suggests that everyone is born musician, poet, artist. It is only later that some of us are labelled ‘plumber grade one’, ‘filing clerk extraordinaire’, ‘train driver’ or ‘telephone worshipper’. POM relates to contemporary art in much the same way as Beatles music relates to Pop Art. POM falls into the Realist/Conceptual bag.

In many ways, a cleansing reaction against the excesses of psychedelia, POM is usually stripped of Gothic, acid imagery. Stripped bare, that is, to reveal another teen beat closer to say country blues, reggae, early rock’n'roll than to the more sophisticated and complex ‘progressive’ developments that have become so top heavy with cosmetic trimmings.

POM is therapeutic, simplistic and (often) embarrassingly real. The songs (pieces really) are distinguished by their one to one relationship with their original ideas. The idea quickly becomes music without resort to cheap thrills.

So where did it come from? The roots of POM are complex. Try the Beatles’ ‘Help!’ for instance. Back there, Lennon wrote a song so direct, so real. The words were true. There is a pain in the lyrics of ‘Help!’ that predates and previews an important element of POM. ‘I’m a Loser’ is another one. And so is ‘Strawberry Fields Forever’, even though its essential pure cry for assistance is damaged and clouded by the flower power arrangement. Lennon’s Beatles’ songs show the roots of POM – ‘Yer Blues’, ‘I’m So Tired’ – songs which might have been performed by the Plastic Ono Band, had circumstances allowed. The Beatles’ dream crumbled to leave a raw surface noise. Harrison turned mystic and Lennon returned to the primitive sounds of the pre-Beatles era. It must have been a hard time closing down the Beatles, cutting away the excess material in a search for a new identity. Yoko brought a fifteen-year involvement with the avant-garde in the arts, the precision of zen and the intellectualisation of ‘reality’. She was the original Wailer. She had flitted about on the Cage/Coleman network for some time and her coalition with Lennon was to prove fruitful if slightly cast adrift by the latter’s saleable image. There is little doubt that Lennon believed in her. She helped him back. The rock elite naturally enough rejected this heavy newcomer: and yet Apple managed to sell some of her pain.

The Plastic Ono Band tried to create the emptiness after a dream. And that is hard work because the emptiness is already there. Much of Yoko’s previous work had to do with emptiness – complete freedom with emptiness. With POM it was turned into music. Lennon had to rebel after Epstein died. He had to veer away from the shoddy intricacies of rock-turned-establishment. In one respect – copping out – all the Beatles’ music was a put on; POM was an attempt to regenerate the original Hamburg primitives. To back up Yoko’s sixteen track voice (totally unparalleled in the annals of rock vocalists) Lennon could draw on his howling roaring guitar sound. He could always make a guitar move, irrespective of technical expertise. And then there was Ringo’s immaculate conception of percussion – crisp, metronomic drumming; only Alan White and Jim Capaldi have ever got anywhere near it – a completely unique style. Lead guitar was not necessary musically but for propaganda purposes Lennon could invite the likes of Clapton and Harrison to ease the pain.

POM was lucky. It had the bizarre organisational and financial backing of Apple – the most erratic business venture in the history of capitalism.

So the amputated Beatle, way out on an Art limb (Yoko had rekindled Lennon’s Art involvement) attracted criticism, intimidation and police harassment. The same music, clouded by George Martin trivia, had made him untouchable, but the press, governments and the police turned in on him as soon as he started playing what he felt. Even when he hung his public image on a conceptual Peace notion. Now rock’n'roll has always been a primitive music, no bullshit, just plenty of jungle rhythm. POM was the Jungle working with Art. And it sounds that way too, direct, almost childlike; powerfully precise.

Let It Be, the last Beatles album, was rough. It took Phil Spector out of retirement to make it sell. He made it his own. POM was to become a music expressing a come back from the near Dada world of Beatlemania. The world had been careless with the Beatles. It’s a wonder they survived at all. What had been coming out as ‘She’s So Heavy’ (Yoko, that was), ‘Revolution’ and so on, was now going to be POM. It was going to be no-bullshit rock tempered with intellectual noise. An absurd, beautiful music. 

POEM 1. Plastic Ono Event Music.  

The first three albums are amazing. They are a celebration of John and Yoko’s meeting, their discovery of each other and their distinct mutual admiration.

Two Virgins (Unfinished Music No. 1), Life With the Lions (Unfinished Music No. 2) and the Wedding Album were made by each other for each other. They consist for the most part of electronic sound, found sound, and some of the best packaging for albums ever. They didn’t sell and they were bad PR for POM; but listening to them in retrospect they say a lot about music – that is, if you’re interested.

POEM 1 is inedible music. Record companies could do worse than check out the packaging of the Wedding Album. All three are worth listening to alone. PPOM. Pure Plastic Ono Music or Primal Plastic Ono Music. In 1969, Lennon put together the first Plastic Ono Band to take to Toronto for a live performance. There was John, Yoko, Eric Clapton (gigging his way out of the Cream hype), Klaus Voorman (artist, musician, eighth Beatle) on bass and Alan White on drums. Lennon announced his imminent disaffiliation with the Beatles on the plane ove the Atlantic. The result – The Plastic Ono Band – Live Peace in Toronto 1969 – has the band, completely unrehearsed, playing some of the best and most bizarre live rock ever recorded.

On side one there’s ‘Blue Suede Shoes’, ‘Money’, ‘Dizzy Miss Lizzy’, ‘Yer Blues’, ‘Cold Turkey’ and ‘Give Peace a Chance’. Side two has Yoko upfront performing ‘Don’t Worry Kyoko’ and ‘John, John’. An important record.

Yoko’s vocals seem to predate Janov’s Primal Scream therapy – the treatment which John and Yoko were to undertake in California, a treatment responsible for the particularly strange quality of the next couple of albums.

John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band and Yoko Ono/Plastic Ono Band came out at the same time around Christmas 1970. They had similar covers. They are both generally underrated records.

John Lennon is the complete cleansing album. The Primal Scream aesthetic that dominates the music relates strongly to the music of Little Richard back in God knows when. Here organised by Starr/Voorman/Ono/Spector, Lennon sets his most painful lyrics, his most horrific guitar playing, against a spatial backdrop characterised by Ringo’s mesmerising percussion. Ringo and Spector seemed to know precisely what was required. It is the most lonely, most agonising music ever to come out of rock. Lennon was letting everything he could find hang out all over the album – his love for Yoko, his pre-adolescent fears, his disbelief in everything other than his newly discovered ‘reality’, his class complex – the list is endless. It is strong, frightening music and yet more beautiful than most everything the Beatles ever did. Try it on, see if it fits. The space between the music is as important as the music itself.

Yoko Ono is a compilation of the good lady’s approach to avant-garde music at the time. Lennon was happy to bill it as ‘Today’s Tutti Frutti’ and he was very nearly right. The music is mad, crazy, wailing sound backed up with the Lennon/Starr/Voorman rhythm machine. Lennon’s guitar becomes an aural air raid, some consummate thunder. There is more pure sound on this record than you would think possible. It is a masterpiece. It includes a rehearsal tape made in 1968 for a show Ono did with Ornette Coleman at the Albert Hall. It is necessary to listen to Ms Ono without prejudice. There is a lot to be heard and even more to be imagined. It sounds like brain damage. Or something. Mr and Mrs Lennon became creatures of New York City. They could work out of Greenwich Village with minimal interference. Their Peace operations had brought them ridicule and notoriety. Now they would concentrate on less universal projects. They would make films, records and personal appearances at a more reasonable profile.

Fly was a film made by Yoko consisting of the adventures of a fly roaming about a naked female body. Its soundtrack was released on Apple as a double album. Accompanied by Lennon, Voorman and Starr, she included a series of songs which begin to make a little more linguistic sense than before. Songs like ‘Mrs Lennon’, the feverish ‘Midsummer New York’ and the startling ‘Dub Dub’ begin to work independently of her husband’s lyricism. Out of the Plastic Ono Band experience, Yoko was pulling her own kind of identifiable (as opposed to avant-garde) music. Lennon meanwhile was at work on Imagine. A cleansing process complete, he could now begin to decorate his sound once more. Imagine has credits to George Harrison, Nicky Hopkins, Jim Keltner, Jim Gordon, King Curtis and the Flux Fiddlers. The Plastic Ono Band was now free to embellish the basic roar with some carefully controlled trickery. It’s still simple; agonised music. But it conveys the feeling that Lennon had washed the terror of the Beatles out. A free man, he was making his own music. Spector was still with him. In retrospect, Spector was always a Plastic Ono thinker. His walls of sound related closely to Lennon’s new ideas. The songs are still incantations of a sort, still direct and real, but were somehow without the last ditch fear and tension of the Primal period. It is calmer, more settled, more ‘pleasant’ I suppose.

His singing more assured, Lennon had become a well respected man about the avant-garde. Both his and Yoko’s depths were adequately plumbed. They seemed to be happy at their work. Public disasters, they had become accepted entertainers once more. But the traumas with the government, the inconsistency of the American Dream, the hassles with Paul and Apple and the old rebel were to emerge again. 

POEM 2. Plastic Ono Elephants Memory. 

Ghosts of a revolution, the White Panthers were planning a working class heroic takeover. John Lennon has always been easily influenced and his next album – Sometime in New York City – was to show the influence of the urban revolution lurking on the underbelly of New York. Lennon and Spector turned the relatively undistinguished Elephants Memory into a powerhouse urban blues band who more than adequately orchestrated John’s new songs about feminism, prison reform, the urban nightmare, the Irish question, the marijuana question, Angela Davis and Yoko’s new songs about feminism, conceptual politics and associated topics. The record is violent and aggressive, its naive political statements rammed home by some of the most well produced urban music ever made. Yoko sings like she just discovered melody, Stan Bronstein’s saxophone is beautifully raw and Tex Gabriel’s guitar is so fine that it is difficult to see why it hadn’t surfaced before or since. A track called ‘New York City’ sums up the album – a festival of urban community consciousness dressed up in Chuck Berry musical formula.

But Sometime in New York City is a double album. The other record has two live performances. One is the Plastic Ono Band live at the Lyceum back in 1969, complete with Delaney and Bonnie, George Harrison, Voorman, Keith Moon, Eric Clapton, Billy Preston, Jim Gordon, Bobby Keys, Alan White, Nicky Hopkins, doing ‘Cold Turkey’ and ‘Don’t Worry Kyoko’. The other is the POB with the Mothers of Invention. Both performances are archetypal POB – as loaded and as bizarre as you can get. The Mothers side is particularly spaced, with Zappa playing some of his miraculous guitar on ‘Well (Baby, Please Don’t Go)’, thoroughly rising to Lennon’s flawless vocal.

Elephants Memory were to come out with an excellent album of their own, produced and masterminded by the Plastic Ono idea but concentrating on their own little upsurge of urban blues. But, without Lennon, they vanished. Somewhere or other.

Sometime in New York City had Lennon and Ono jointly credited. They shared the album. Later, Yoko came up with a double album all of her own. Approximately Infinite Universe is the feminist album of all time. Inspired, no doubt, by her discovery that she could sing songs and write lyrics with the best of them, Yoko made the record with Elephants Memory. It is a remarkable performance characterised by the saddest songs I have ever heard and by some of the most scholarly presentation and arrangement, which show Elephants Memory with Lennon at their helm to be a convincing musical outfit with an abundance of talent at its disposal.

But the next manifestation of the Plastic Ono Band was not to include Elephants Memory. Mind Games has Lennon backed up by a conglomeration of relatively unknown but nonetheless well equipped musicians: David Spinozza (guitar), Ken Ascher (keyboards), Gordon Edwards (bass), Jim Keltner (drums) and an assortment of additives. Spector is conspicuous by his absence. With Yoko working on her own album with the same musicians, Lennon puts in a perfectly good performance. But somewhere something is missing or just different. Mind Games doesn’t have the energy that other POM has. And nor does Yoko’s Feeling the Space. But the latter is at least different – her writing and performing is taking on interesting aspects all of its own as though the Plastic Ono configuration is no longer of any concern to her. Complexities have crept into the original POM idea; the music has become fussy with sensory overload. The initial energy, the raw power of a Beatle reborn and energised by a new found direction seems to have dissipated amongst new problems.

Which is sad. POB had put out a series of singles which taken in context presented yet another dimension. The music of ‘Instant Karma’, ‘Cold Turkey’, ‘Power to the People’, ‘Give Peace a Chance’, was a direct descendant of such songs as ‘We Shall Overcome’, ‘Oh Happy Day’. These were songs for mass consumption, an electric folk music intended for transmission the world over. Again, their roots can be found in the Beatles – doing ‘All You Need Is Love’ via satellite to all corners of the suffering globe.

So another dream is over for Lennon. Or seems to be. In context, Plastic Ono Music has been a pleasure. Not to mention the hundreds of associated events, happenings – charitable and otherwise – occurences and cultural phenomena generated by the timely coalition of John and Yoko.

Idris Walters

Permalink Leave a Comment

Hunter S. Thompson – “Security” (1955)

September 27, 2009 at 3:20 pm (Life & Politics, Reviews & Articles)

An early writing by HST, when he was 17…

 

Security … what does this word mean in relation to life as we know it today? For the most part, it means safety and freedom from worry. It is said to be the end that all men strive for; but is security a utopian goal or is it another word for rut?

Let us visualize the secure man; and by this term, I mean a man who has settled for financial and personal security for his goal in life. In general, he is a man who has pushed ambition and initiative aside and settled down, so to speak, in a boring, but safe and comfortable rut for the rest of his life. His future is but an extension of his present, and he accepts it as such with a complacent shrug of his shoulders. His ideas and ideals are those of society in general and he is accepted as a respectable, but average and prosaic man. But is he a man? has he any self-respect or pride in himself? How could he, when he has risked nothing and gained nothing? What does he think when he sees his youthful dreams of adventure, accomplishment, travel and romance buried under the cloak of conformity? How does he feel when he realizes that he has barely tasted the meal of life; when he sees the prison he has made for himself in pursuit of the almighty dollar? If he thinks this is all well and good, fine, but think of the tragedy of a man who has sacrificed his freedom on the altar of security, and wishes he could turn back the hands of time. A man is to be pitied who lacked the courage to accept the challenge of freedom and depart from the cushion of security and see life as it is instead of living it second-hand. Life has by-passed this man and he has watched from a secure place, afraid to seek anything better What has he done except to sit and wait for the tomorrow which never comes?

Turn back the pages of history and see the men who have shaped the destiny of the world. Security was never theirs, but they lived rather than existed. Where would the world be if all men had sought security and not taken risks or gambled with their lives on the chance that, if they won, life would be different and richer? It is from the bystanders (who are in the vast majority) that we receive the propaganda that life is not worth living, that life is drudgery, that the ambitions of youth must he laid aside for a life which is but a painful wait for death. These are the ones who squeeze what excitement they can from life out of the imaginations and experiences of others through books and movies. These are the insignificant and forgotten men who preach conformity because it is all they know. These are the men who dream at night of what could have been, but who wake at dawn to take their places at the now-familiar rut and to merely exist through another day. For them, the romance of life is long dead and they are forced to go through the years on a treadmill, cursing their existence, yet afraid to die because of the unknown which faces them after death. They lacked the only true courage: the kind which enables men to face the unknown regardless of the consequences.

As an afterthought, it seems hardly proper to write of life without once mentioning happiness; so we shall let the reader answer this question for himself: who is the happier man, he who has braved the storm of life and lived or he who has stayed securely on shore and merely existed?

Hunter S. Thompson

Permalink Leave a Comment

Joel Selvin – “Ralph J. Gleason” (2004)

September 27, 2009 at 11:35 am (Music, Reviews & Articles)

Dec. 23, 2004 San Francisco Chronicle article by Joel Selvin about noted jazz & rock critic Ralph J. Gleason. Gleason also wrote for The Chronicle back in the 60s, and was one of the founders of Rolling Stone (with Jann Wenner), as well as writing for Down Beat magazine in the 1950s.  Gleason passed away in 1975…  

 

Don’t let the tweed jackets, trench coat and pipe fool you – Ralph J. Gleason was an apostle of jazz and rock with few peers.

 

Ralph J. Gleason’s Berkeley hills home looks as if he left last week, even though the great jazz and rock critic has been dead for nearly 30 years. His epic LP record collection covers one wall of the living room and a pile of 45 RPM singles sits by the door. A poster from the first San Francisco rock concert at the Longshoreman’s Hall hangs in the center of the living room. It was one of three silk-screened by Jefferson Airplane vocalist Marty Balin.

A couple of dozen old friends gathered there one night after attending a screening at Fantasy Studios. It was a night like many long ago, when the house rang with music and laughter and seemed to be the center of the world for the people who were there. It hasn’t been like that in a long time, but this more recent night was special.

Kehala Gleason, 21, and her college pal Jennica Murray spent their junior year making a movie about the grandfather Gleason never knew. At Fantasy, they screened an hour-long rough-cut of the class project for friends and family. Young Gleason, a petite blonde who grew up in a log cabin without electricity or telephones in eastern Washington, was leaving the next day to spend six months with an agitprop street-theater troupe in Mexico.

The sweet student film, which may never screen again, mixed vintage footage from the Gleason family archive – photos of him with the Beatles, Coltrane; film footage of him with Sonny Rollins – with tributes from friends and associates. Her grandfather’s name was still good enough for the young Gleason to land interviews with Rolling Stone publisher Jann Wenner, rock critic Dave Marsh, journalist Studs Terkel and others (including myself). Kehala Gleason’s voiceover narrative, in her reticent little girl’s voice, gave the whole thing a sentimental wash.

“We came to this house expecting to find answers and found questions,” she intones over a sequence of shots taken at the Spruce Street house. “We came to the past and found hope for the future.”

Among the friends at the party was an artist who once ran off to Hawaii with one of the Quicksilver Messenger Service. Also attending, coincidentally, was Ron Polte, the man who used to manage the group. Ralph was much in the air. “He was a really cool father,” said his oldest daughter, Brigitte, 53, whose 24-year-old son, Kelly, is living with his grandmother these days. “He took us to the Fillmore and everything. But he always wore a tie.”

Music critics are a dime a dozen these days. Virtually everyone who can score advance CDs from the labels seems to be out there hawking commentary in print or on the Internet.

But there was a time, not that long ago, when there were only a few and they all knew each other. Today’s pop music critics, who cut their teeth on Pearl Jam and Nirvana, will never have the chance to leave behind a legacy like Gleason’s. In an age of the information superhighway and media overload, the era of E! Television and Entertainment Weekly, how do you explain one lone writer working for a daily newspaper in a provincial backwater changing music history? But it was never easy to explain Gleason, even when he was alive.

He started one of the first magazines about jazz. He was the first full-time jazz critic on a daily newspaper in this country. At a time when there were practically no books on the subject, he wrote the history of jazz on the back of album covers, writing literally hundreds of liner notes in the golden age of long-playing albums.

He was the cofounder of the Monterey Jazz Festival and co-founder of Rolling Stone magazine. When Lou Adler and John Phillips of the Mamas and Papas wanted to throw the Monterey Pop Festival, they traveled north to kiss the Gleason ring, knowing they couldn’t hope to pull it off without his approval.

He was the defender and friend of Lenny Bruce, the chronicler and confidant of Duke Ellington, a man who wrote poetry for Miles Davis albums, hosted John Coltrane and Bob Dylan on television and produced one of the best country and western movies ever made. He was a vigilant defender of free speech and an outspoken lefty who understood that music and politics were inextricably linked. He made Nixon’s enemies list.

His trademark trench coat hangs in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland. He was a natty dresser who favored tweed jackets, deerstalker hats, wore a handlebar mustache and smoked a pipe. He was also a diabetic who drank only milk at nightclubs and always carried a Hershey bar in his pocket in case of emergency.

“He did a wonderful job of living in his world,” said veteran jazz producer Orrin Keepnews, who worked across the hall from Gleason at Berkeley’s Fantasy Records in the ’70s. “He might partake of your world, but he lived in his world.”

The movie, “Remembering Ralph J. Gleason,” begins, as it should, with his writing. The clattering of his Underwood typewriter fills the black screen and his words appear typewritten on the screen, letter by letter:

“Form and rhythm in music are never changed without producing changes in the most important political forms and ways.”

Plato said that.

The quote comes from the essay “Like a Rolling Stone” that Gleason wrote for American Scholar magazine in 1966. The student filmmakers include the rest of his introduction to that essay later in the film:

“There something happenin’ here. What it is ain’t exactly clear. There’s a man with a gun over there, telling me I’ve got to beware. I think it’s time we STOP, children, what’s that sound? Everybody look what’s going down.”

Buffalo Springfield said that.

“For the reality of politics, we must go to the poets, not the politicians.”

Norman O. Brown said that.

“For the reality of what’s happening today in America, we must go to rock ‘n’ roll, to popular music.”

I said that.

Old black-and-white footage from a 1965 British Broadcasting Corporation program about people with unusual jobs shows Gleason in his attic office, wearing a checkered shirt, fiddling with his pipe and tapping away at the keyboard. His reedy, pinched voice fills the room: “Well, this is Gleason high in the Oakland/Berkeley hills, as usual, bringing all the latest news from Never-Neverland, which, if you think about it, is where we all really live.”

The idea that popular arts deserved serious commentary emerged in 1924, a mere 10 years before Gleason wrote his first record reviews for his college newspaper, the Columbia Spectator. The publication of “The 7 Lively Arts” by Gilbert Seldes, an East Coast Brahmin and editor of the long-defunct Dial magazine, was greeted by an uproar among the high-brows. He dared to extol the virtues of such prosaic fare as jazz, Charlie Chaplin movies, Flo Ziegfield musicals and “Krazy Kat” cartoons. “Newspaper Comics, Circus, Slapstick Films, Jazz Are Art, Says Editor of ‘Dial,’ ” sniffed an indignant Chronicle headline of the day.

In 1934, both jazz and Gleason were in the full bloom of youth. He discovered the music during a case of the measles, when the doctor prescribed bed rest in a dark room and his mother let him listen to the Atwater Kent. “I lay there, wide awake in the night, picking up those strange sounds in the night – Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong, Cab Calloway, Earl Hines, Fletcher Henderson,” he wrote in the introduction to “Celebrating the Duke,” his posthumously published collection of jazz writing.

As with all schools of art, as jazz grew, the music developed a critical elite. Otis Ferguson, also one of the first film critics, wrote about jazz for the New Republic, starting in 1936. The music’s new scholars soon began to document the history. French discographers Hughes Panassie and Charles Delaunay published their error-riddled but nevertheless landmark works in the mid-’30s. Two important books on jazz history – Wilder Hobson’s “American Jazz Music” and “Jazzmen” by Frederic Ramsey Jr. and Charles Edward Smith – were published in 1939, the same year Gleason left Columbia to start what may have been the first magazine devoted to the music, Jazz Information.

In 1939, New York was the unquestioned jazz capital of the universe and Columbia University was only blocks from Harlem, home to Duke Ellington, Fats Waller, Billie Holiday, Lionel Hampton, Cab Calloway. The Count Basie Band had just moved to New York. The entire world of jazz was swinging in uptown Manhattan, and Gleason used to go door-to-door in the black neighborhoods, looking to buy old jazz records. He also haunted the clubs and theaters where bands played by night.

“And when I got to the Big Apple,” he wrote in a set of Jimmie Lunceford album notes, “and found that you could actually get to see a band like this in person at the Apollo or the Savoy Ballroom or the Renaissance or the Strand or Paramount theaters, I simply couldn’t believe it. It was just too good to be true.”

San Francisco in the ’40s was the world headquarters of the New Orleans jazz revival. Lu Watters and the Yerba Buena Jazz Band started playing in 1939, soon settling into residency at the Dawn Club, a basement in an alley off Market Street, its site marked today by a brass plaque. In 1943, jazz enthusiasts bought a new set of false teeth for old-time New Orleans trumpeter Bunk Johnson and brought him to San Francisco for a series of historic concerts.

In September 1945, Gleason, who spent the war years working for the Office of War Information, booked the old Dixieland jazzman into the Stuyvesant Casino on New York’s Lower East Side. The following year, Gleason and his wife, Jean, moved to San Francisco to produce concerts by New Orleans tailgate trombonist Kid Ory, then living in Los Angeles, only recently rescued from obscurity and his job in the poultry business by appearances on the Orson Welles radio program.

Gleason soon found sympathetic ears at The Chronicle in executive editor Scott Newhall and managing editor Gordon Pates, music fans whose taste tended toward Earl Hines and Edith Piaf, respectively. He started at $15 per review. In 1950, they hired him full-time, about the same time he started contributing regularly to the bi-monthly bible of jazz, Downbeat magazine. By 1954, the Gleason family and its three children could afford a modest home on busy Ashby Avenue in Berkeley’s Elmwood district.

At The Chronicle, Gleason became the first daily newspaper critic in the country to cover jazz and pop music openings like theater or opera openings. Although his main topic was jazz, he was no snob. He picked up stories across the pop panorama. He interviewed Hank Williams and covered his show in 1952 at San Pablo Hall in the far reaches of the East Bay. Gleason gave early glowing reviews to Nat King Cole (“the top balladeer of his time”) and Frank Sinatra (“far and above anybody by a country mile”).

He kept an ear cocked toward other sounds and frequently lectured his readers on the musical qualities of rock ‘n’ roll and rhythm and blues. He interviewed Elvis Presley, Fats Domino, Louis Jordan, Ivory Joe Hunter, Big Joe Turner and Ray Charles in The Chronicle. He even paused to scorch the unspeakably square Pat Boone (“pretentious and a bit of a phony”).

From the pulpit of the daily newspaper, Gleason’s jazz criticism penetrated mainstream culture. He gave early coverage to Miles Davis and described Louis Armstrong in 1954 as “one of the most important people alive today.” Gleason and Davis became close friends. Gleason once returned from visiting the trumpeter during a nightclub engagement where the diabetic Gleason discovered that he and Davis used the same-sized hypodermic needles. Davis was not diabetic.

But Gleason never limited his contributions to the printed page. He played a crucial role in founding the Monterey Jazz Festival. It was Gleason’s idea to take the music out of the dark, smoky, smelly nightclubs and into the fresh air and sunshine. Disc jockey Jimmy Lyons, who ran the festival for the first 34 years, located the horse show arena on the Monterey County Fairgrounds. “Ralph was essential to the festival,” said the late Grover Sales, publicist on the first festival. “He suggested the whole concept of the festival.”

They certainly got the cast they wanted for that 1958 weekend – Louis Armstrong, Dizzy Gillespie, Billie Holiday, Dave Brubeck, Modern Jazz Quartet, Sonny Rollins. But serving the festival behind the scenes made little difference to his coverage. He was equally capable of cheering or criticizing the event in the paper the next day. When Los Angeles Times jazz critic Leonard Feather complained about Gleason having better seats, Feather was informed that Gleason had paid for his tickets.

A contentious Irish American who read extensively on topics ranging from the Civil War to civil rights, Gleason took a put-up-your-dukes attitude about anything he thought smacked of injustice, intolerance or ignorance. He took up the Lenny Bruce cause when nobody else did. He testified eloquently in Bruce’s trials about his social significance as a comedian and wrote passionate defenses of Bruce’s work in the press.

Bruce sent Gleason presents; he borrowed Gleason’s name in his routines (“and here he is, that silver master of the airwaves, Ralph J. Gleason …”). And, as Bruce’s legal problems with obscenity busts intensified, Gleason grew ever more emphatic in his columns.

“Truly it is Kafka’s ‘The Trial’ brought to life,” he wrote, “to real life. And if the closing walls do, in the end, bring silence, we will be the guilty, all of us, not Lenny Bruce.”

He saw some of the same rebel qualities in Bob Dylan, just not at first. He caught Dylan’s West Coast debut at the 1963 Monterey Folk festival and dismissed him. A year later, he repented. “When I first heard Bob Dylan at Monterey I did not like him,” Gleason wrote, “I was deaf.”

His endorsement of Dylan came from a major, well-credentialed spokesman. Gleason had become widely recognized as the country’s top jazz critic. His Chronicle column was syndicated to more than 60 papers across the nation. In addition to his contributions to Variety, Downbeat, Hi-Fi/Stereo Review and other national magazines, he brought jazz to network television.

From 1961 to 1968, Gleason, who looked like a casting director’s dream of a professorial jazz critic, produced and hosted a half-hour television show, Jazz Casual, hovering over the pianos, puffing his pipe and drawing out such figures as Count Basie, Louis Armstrong, John Coltrane, Carmen McRae, Dizzy Gillespie, Dave Brubeck, Modern Jazz Quartet. “He got Count Basie to talk more than I ever heard before,” said fellow jazz critic Nat Hentoff, “more than I ever did.”

The close-focus, intimate programs were broadcast across the country on what was then called educational TV, the precursor to PBS, long before jazz musicians were accustomed to seeing themselves on television. He produced landmark specials with Duke Ellington. With his connections at the television station KQED, Gleason arranged and hosted a remarkable press conference with Dylan in 1965.

Gleason leads Dylan through the crowded room and makes the introduction while Dylan settles into a seat behind a table. “Welcome to KQED’s first poet press conference,” Gleason said. “Mr. Dylan is a poet. He will answer questions on everything from atomic science to riddles and rhymes. Go.”

The Gleason home, less than a mile from campus, was action central. Student leaders sought his advice and held meetings in the living room. When the four long-haired artists who called themselves the Family Dog planned to throw a dance at Longshoreman’s Hall featuring new rock groups with crazy names such as the Charlatans, Jefferson Airplane and the Great Society, they came over to discuss their ideas. “San Francisco can be the American Liverpool, ” Family Dog’s Luria Castell told Gleason.

That night at Longshoreman’s, Gleason stood on the balcony and watched the birth of the San Francisco scene. When he came down to the dance floor, a 19-year-old college student named Jann Wenner, who wrote a rock music column for the Daily Cal, walked over and introduced himself. “I knew exactly who he was,” Wenner said in a phone interview from his Midtown Manhattan offices.

As the San Francisco rock scene exploded, Gleason was there, night after night, reporting each latest development in the pages of The Chronicle. He covered the first public performance by the Jefferson Airplane. He quickly became the band’s biggest booster, wrote the liner notes for the first album and followed the Airplane intensely in the paper.

Band member Paul Kantner later cribbed some lyrics from a piece Gleason wrote about a concert in Golden Gate Park. Gleason wrote a paperback book, “The Jefferson Airplane and the San Francisco Sound,” and then handed over his column to a guest reviewer who panned the book.

Wenner accompanied Gleason to shows and spent long hours at Gleason’s home. “It was always easy to scrounge a free meal,” said Wenner. “I was predictably there around dinner time.”

Gleason found the fledgling rock critic a job at Sunday Ramparts, a new broadsheet newspaper started by the publishers of Ramparts, a left-wing San Francisco magazine where Gleason was contributing editor. A framed blank page from Sunday Ramparts hangs in the Gleason home to this day, a handwritten message scrawled in marker pen: “Thanks for the job, the advice and the start. Love, Jann.”

Gleason didn’t simply encourage Wenner. He invested $1,500 in the magazine Wenner wanted to start and, when the first issue of Rolling Stone was published in November 1967, Gleason was listed as consulting editor and introduced his long-running column in that magazine with a sermon on race relations in pop music: “Sound Is Without Color.”

At age 48, he was substantially older than both his audience and the people he was writing about. Gleason can’t decide, the joke went, whether he’s two 24-year-olds, three 16-year-olds or four 12-year-olds.

Gleason’s relationship with Wenner turned stormy at Rolling Stone. He battled with his protege over editorial issues and personnel matters. Gleason fumed when Wenner spent precious funds for metal filing cabinets when cardboard boxes would do. He briefly quit the magazine weeks before its first anniversary.

In June 1970, Gleason left his full-time post at The Chronicle. He kept a Sunday column and continued to write a column for Rolling Stone. His old friend Saul Zaentz, owner of Fantasy Records, sold a few million records by a rock band called Creedence Clearwater Revival and built a spanking-new Berkeley headquarters for the label, complete with recording studios and a grand, sweeping staircase leading to the second-floor executive suites. He brought Gleason onboard as a kind of minister without portfolio.

In early 1975, Gleason began frustrating, infuriating negotiations with Wenner to sell back his stock in Rolling Stone. “Do me a favor,” Gleason said to a mutual associate he bumped into on the streets of Berkeley. “The next time you see him, punch him in the nose for me.”

On Monday, June 2, Wenner returned to his office from flying around the state with Tom Hayden – then campaigning for U.S. Senate and married, at the time, to Jane Fonda – and learned that Gleason had suffered a massive heart attack. Wenner burst into uncontrollable sobs. By nightfall, Gleason was dead at age 58.

Within a year, Wenner folded the Rolling Stone tent in San Francisco and slipped off to New York. “It seemed like a good time to get out of Dodge,” he said.

Gleason’s 83-year-old widow, Jean, is sitting on her front porch, smoking a cigarette, waiting for her visitor.

Her eyesight is going but her peripheral vision is strong, so she tilts her head when she talks, looking out of the corner of her eye.

She lives in the Berkeley hills home she and Gleason bought in 1970, sharing the panoramic view with her grandson Kelly, Kelly’s dog, and two other young people who worked with her granddaughter, Kehala, on the documentary. The two college students continue to work on the film, trying to raise money and film more interviews. Ralph Gleason’s books still line the shelves and his papers are stowed in the attic. It doesn’t look like Jean Gleason has bought a single piece of new furniture since they moved in.

Ralph Gleason first met her older brother in a crap game. The brother said his younger sister was a jazz fan. His interest piqued, Gleason took the provincial young lady from out of town to see the jazz bands on 52nd Street. “It was one of those setups you think you’re going to hate, but I didn’t,” says Jean Gleason. “We really grooved.”

They married in 1940. Throughout his career, she was his support team — typing, clipping columns, sending out clippings to record companies and pals across the country, taking his finished copy to the bus stop and convincing the AC Transit driver to take it to the East Bay Terminal where a Chronicle copy boy would pick it up.

Gleason did not keep a desk at The Chronicle office. He worked out of his home and occasionally dropped by the city room at night, on his way out to the clubs, to pick up the mail. The BBC caught Gleason making one of his nighttime visits to The Chronicle in 1965.

Wearing his trench coat, pipe in mouth, Gleason pauses at the entrance by the phone booths at the top of the office to exchange words with city editor Abe Mellinkoff. He drops a column off at the copy desk and he walks back to speak with Datebook editor Judy Stone. “He didn’t like to be edited, I can tell you that,” said Stone in an interview.

The only time his editors cut him off was when he wrote about the anniversary of the attempt to assassinate Hitler (Gleason, a World War II buff, had been reading up on the Third Reich). Managing editor Gordon Pates thought that had gone too far astray for the boundaries of an entertainment section. Pates always told him that the publisher would read the first few sentences of his column to see if he had gotten subversive, so Gleason needed to start tame. That may explain why Gleason developed a habit of what they call in journalistic circles “burying the lead.”

“He was not a good writer,” says his widow. “He wrote about interesting things.”

Joel Selvin

Permalink Leave a Comment

President Obama’s Weekly Address (Sept. 26, 2009)

September 27, 2009 at 8:34 am (Life & Politics)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Jim Green – “Lene Lovich” (1982)

September 26, 2009 at 10:54 am (Music, Reviews & Articles)

A January 1982 article on unjustly-(almost) forgotten New Wave artist Lene Lovich, from Trouser Press magazine. Lovich’s first 2 albums (Stateless and Flex) are highly recommended… 

 

“Many people have said to me, ‘You must have changed your style, because you now have a popular record with ‘New Toy’,” says Lene Lovich. But it’s not true – if anything popular taste has caught up with her.

Back in the fall of 1978, when Stiff mounted its second major assault on the British music biz, Lovich stood out (even from the rest of the bizarre Stiff crew) with her outlandish dress, coiffure and theatrical delivery, using her voice no differently than the sax she occasionally tooted. Her songs were an olio of Nick Lowe-ish Pure Pop and Euro-cabaret, her slightly pixilated arrangements were laced with synthesizer and organ, and often powered by an R&B dance beat.

What at the time seemed a bit outre, even gauche, has since been adopted whole or in part by rafts of aspiring thrushes and bands. Where once Lovich was likened to Patti Smith for lack of even vaguely comparable new wave female singers, she now has her own “school” of followers – although many people have no idea she was there first.

Asked about the most frequent interview topic on her recent East Coast US tour to promote the ‘New Toy’ EP, Lovich thinks a moment and says, “I get a lot of, um, ‘I never knew that was your real hair!’ “

‘New Toy’ – purportedly from a forthcoming LP, No-Man’s Land – first appeared here as a 12-inch single on US Stiff, even though Epic, with whom Stiff has a selective US distribution pact, had released Lovich’s two LPs. Stiff sources give the distinct impression that Epic had to be shown numbers and charts of sales and radio play to be convinced it would be missing out on a good thing if it didn’t pick it up. Eventually Epic did, but added three other tracks to make a 12-inch EP that radio stations would take seriously. The new tracks were only mildly impressive at best; what ever happened to No-Man’s Land? Stiff and Epic sources hinted at a lack of new material.

“We’ve had many distractions,” Lovich admits, referring to herself and bald-pated husband/co-writer/co-producer/guitarist Les Chappell. “We were writing and making some recordings when ‘New Toy’ was released as a single in Europe. Les and I have been busy changing ideas about what we do, for the first time really, about what happens to us and what might in the future. It was the first time we’d stopped [constantly touring and recording], and we couldn’t see the future to continue to be that way.

“Suddenly there was more pressure from everyone to have a hit record and use a more established producer. With all these pressures, it became difficult for us to be independent – to have our own way, in other words. You can’t just ask the record company for some money to go into the studio, because they want to know what you’re doing and why – and, obviously, ‘Will it be a hit?’

“Stiff has always been confident about us. They gave us our first chance, and I’m sure no other record company would’ve even listened to us. [The pressure's] more from Epic. It sounds like I’m complaining but I have a lot of friends there; it’s just that with this recession they have to show some kind of success, and if I don’t have some soon they fear they won’t be able to continue with us.”

One such friend at Epic is Dick Wingate, Lovich’s product manager (a link between A&R and marketing and promotion). He is enthusiastic about ‘New Toy’ (“her best record yet”) and its limited if promising success, but sounds resigned about a timetable for Lovich’s next album and her declining to work with several “name” producers.

“On the Flex tour I got Roy Thomas Baker down to see Lene at the Whisky in LA, and he was frothing at the mouth to produce her. Tony Visconti” – who, coincidentally, has been producing Lovich-like Hazel O’Connor – “has wanted to produce Lene for a long time. But no.” Mike Chapman has also reportedly expressed interest.

In the case of Baker, Lovich says, “It was an unfortunate situation, in that it wasn’t long before I heard that Ric [Ocasek], from the Cars, said in an interview that he would be co-producing us [with Baker]. I have a lot of respect for the Cars, but to suddenly hear that that was in the paper and not even be told about it – you can understand how that would put me off, although it might have been a misunderstanding or lack of communication.

“Les and I began to feel we were just going to be pushed into the background. I have great respect for [Baker, Chapman and Visconti,] but also for our own ideas; they have their own techniques and ways of working, and I also would rather not be just another notch on someone’s gun, or whatever.”

Wingate thought Baker would be the “perfect” producer for Lovich, but he has a reputation as a bit of a studio tyrant – exactly the opposite of what Lovich and Chappell evidently prefer. Roger Bechirian and Alan Winstanley got production credit on Flex but Lovich stresses that “it was really all our ideas.”

“There are people I’d like to work with,” she says – and cites Ennio Morricone as the prime example. The Italian, who’s most famous for scoring Clint Eastwood spaghetti Westerns, was evidently intrigued by the idea but already booked up well into the future. And he wouldn’t have a large ego to deal with?

“He’s coming from a different standard – different ideas, different considerations that are not so far away from what I’m doing. I try to create an atmosphere in the stories I tell and he does the same with film music. Never having done rock music, just classical and film scores, he’d have (I think) a fresh approach rather than using the same processes which most producers use.”

Meanwhile, Lovich and Chappell plan to oversee themselves, hopefully with only minimal assistance from an engineer. “We’re not just interested in songs and performing but the whole process of making music. We just want to see what we can do and won’t learn anything if we don’t get a chance to do it. I think maybe it was a mistake to let us do it ourselves in the first place” – they’ve essentially produced both Stateless and Flex – “because now that we’ve had a taste of that kind of freedom we don’t want to give it up so easily.”

In an attempt to find another way of prolonging that independence, Lovich and Chappell have come up with a plan: they’re building their own 16-track studio.

“It’s taken a long time to realize, but in many ways the demos we do at home are much more direct; when we have to translate them for other people the ideas get a little lost. It’s very tiring to explain and constantly justify yourself. I like to be fresh and excited about what I do.”

Hence the studio. Hence some of the delays. “Part of our plan is to move outside London.” Where? Lovich only smiles. “We bought this large house on an acre and a quarter of land and got a permit to have the studio there, all of which took a long time. We don’t pretend to know everything about recording and understanding the machines, but maybe we will after we’ve had our own studio for a while. It’s frustrating, but now that we’ve got this plan we can’t actually carry it out just yet, perhaps not for another six months.”

To understand Lene Lovich one must grasp her attitude toward creating: “I think our music is more personal than other people’s. There’s a big hesitancy for us to finish a song; it’s like killing it.” Lovich laughs, as if to undercut the gravity of what she’s saying. “That’s why my words are difficult. I never like to finish a story. I’m not trying to be vague: I just want it to live and change, and maybe the last little bit left will be added in people’s minds. That’s audience participation!”

The East-European feel to some of her melodies is difficult to talk about, she says because it’s unintentional, unplanned. “I think it’s not so much Eastern European as just not rock, or whatever you want to call it. Influences come from all over and I just allow them to go in and come out. It’s often difficult for me to detect where something’s coming from.”

Where Lene Lovich is coming from currently isn’t as puzzling a question as where she’s going. She no longer maintains a full-time band, and refuses to take on a manager. Yet her self-confidence was on full display in a glowing performance as surprise guest at the housewarming for US Stiff’s new offices in lower Manhattan’s loft district. The crowd gathered around for an energetic singalong to the “la la” refrain from ‘Home’, an affectionate response whose reported duplication throughout the tour indicates busloads of potential for expanding Lovich’s popularity in the States – if she can overcome the usual barriers. “To most of US radio, Lene’s too new, too strange,” product manager Wingate laments. He wishes he had a full album to promote, but has stopped expecting one, even through next spring.

Will Lene Lovich sort out her creative impulses? Will she and Chappell succeed by maintaining their ability to ‘Say When’? Will she find a home in the hearts of pop consumers? That she’s come this far without the recognition she deserves is a shame; that she has retained so much control is surprising. Let’s hope as she sings on Flex, the angels do indeed watch her every move.

Jim Green

Permalink 2 Comments

Frank Zappa – “Lumpy Gravy” (1967)

September 25, 2009 at 1:09 am (Frank Zappa, Music, Reviews & Articles)

Another chapter from the online book Zappology: Zappa Observations, Minutiae and Conceptual Continuity Connections, written by Chris Federico (circa 2002 – but recently updated). Here is the link if anyone wants to check out more from him http://chrisfederico.angelfire.com/

 

After contacting symphonic session musicians through trombonist Kenneth Shroyer, who’d played on Absolutely Free, Frank formed the one-off Abnuceals Emuukha Electric Symphony Orchestra & Chorus, made up of the musicians and characters as they appeared piecemeal on the album, rather than in any simultaneously orchestral and vocal performances. The Chorus was actually a speaking cast, its members’ dialogue taking the place of sung lyrics. They were recorded conversing with their heads stuck inside a Steinway grand piano during several sessions at Apostolic Studios in New York City. The chats were improvised, but they followed Frank’s general thematic guidelines. He amassed eight or nine hours of conversation from which to select; further snippets were heard in a few spots on following albums, but the piano characters returned with prominence on Civilization, Phaze III (1994), which clarified and continued the plot (all the way to the end of the world) from where it had left off on Lumpy Gravy, using old characters from that album and new, freshly recorded “piano people.”

The album features three Mothers; Bunk Gardner plays woodwinds and brass, while the others — Roy Estrada and Jim “Motorhead” Sherwood, the latter often using the voice of his alter-ego, Larry Fanoga (“Almost Chinese, huh!” and “Drums are too noisy when you got no corners to hide in”) — are listed as members of the Chorus. Other enclosed-perspective piano inhabitants are played by studio staff members, Louie the Turkey from the Garrick Theater audience, and Spider Barbour of Chrysalis, another group recording at Apostolic at the time.

Completed in 1967, this two-sided piece featured the earliest commercial appearance of Frank’s orchestral music. Some of the material was even recorded with a fifty-piece Los Angeles orchestra. The album was commissioned by Nik Venet of Capitol Records, who’d formerly signed the Beach Boys. It had been assumed that Frank was contractually free to compose and conduct, since MGM had only signed him as a musician and vocalist along with the rest of the Mothers. The latter company disagreed, threatened to sue, and finally bought the master tapes. It was just as well; Capitol’s engineers had messed up the countless edits, requiring Frank to reconstruct the album. He and engineer Gary Kellgren labored over this unexpected task at Mayfair Studios in New York City. All in all, the release of the album was delayed for over a year.

The album’s title, originally taken from a television commercial for Aloma Linda Gravy Quick, describes Zappa’s upsetting of the “smooth” textures of popular orchestral music. His congealing of dyed-in-the-wool classical forms is achieved through utter compositional freedom, as well as intrusions of hard reality: the “lumps” of the imperfect real world, much more interesting than the dull familiarities of antiquated musical forms. The lumps are the “meat of the matter,” and also happen to be the tastiest part of the gravy. Frank is opting for meat rather than vegetation: substance, not to mention the variety (and humor) of reality, rather than derivative musical uniformity. Upcoming titles will update this idea (Uncle Meat and Burnt Weeny Sandwich most drastically, but also, a bit less directly, Hot Rats and Weasels Ripped My Flesh).

The front-cover photo, backdropped in gravy brown, features Frank in a non-hip, comfortable outfit, staring proudly up at the spectator from his laboratory like a worker after a long day. He’s wearing a shirt occasionally aired onstage that advertises Pipco, a Santa Barbara, California pipe company that has made shirts to sponsor little-league teams (although Frank won’t learn of the shirt’s origins until long after 1967). The clothing-store dummy inside the gatefold hearkens back to the plastic people on Absolutely Free.

The opening theme will return in “Bwana Dik,” a song about a guy’s fixation on penis size, on Fillmore East, June 1971. Sneaking the theme of an album that partially deals with male hang-ups into a song about genitals is characteristically crafty. The subject is also alluded to beyond Motorhead’s monologue on Lumpy Gravy, when a cigar is brought up during Roy and Louie’s dialogue.

The slow, lovely introduction to the instrumental version of “Oh, No” is a revisited 1962 theme that Frank wrote for the World’s Greatest Sinner soundtrack. The snatch of surf guitar that’s heard after Spider says “A bit o’ nostalgia for the old folks!” comes from the 1963 song “Hurricane,” which Frank produced for Conrad and the Hurricane Strings at his Studio Z.

In light of Motorhead’s car-engine reference “Bored out, 90 over,” All-Night John’s later statement, “Round things are boring,” suggests that the word “boring” can be heard as the less apparent verb, rather than the obvious adjective. Elements on the album — the drum, the merry-go-‘round and the vicious circle — are round things; so is the record itself. These things are perhaps now “boring” into the society Frank wishes to infiltrate and change with his music (this optimism will diminish in time). In his 1968 essay “The New Rock,” Frank will write, “It’s something of a paradox that companies which manufacture and distribute this art form (strictly for profit) might one day be changed or controlled by young people who were motivated to action by the products these companies sell.” The ants (round things, in their own ways) on the back cover of 1975’s One Size Fits All are boring into the crumbling cityscape. “Round things are boring” also appears as one of many messages bordering the circular star map on that back cover; the confinement of such a limitless place that “fits all” as the universe (or music) to a convenient, measureable shape just to accommodate our filtered minds is boring in the dull sense. (See the section on Apostrophe (‘) for more on boring, round stuff.)

The second half’s opening vocal, which sounds like an attempt by a drunk guy to sing along with the mainstream music that’s been darting in and out — something like “ba-BOMP-BODDY!” — will, with the release of The Lost Episodes (1996), be revealed as a fragment of “Ronnie Sings?”, a recording of Frank’s boyhood friend Ronnie Williams (who introduced him to Paul Buff of Pal Studios, which eventually became Studio Z) making rough-throated scat sounds to Frank’s guitar accompaniment in an Ontario living room in 1961 or ‘62. Ronnie’s booger-saving, fart-lighting and accidental urine-creature-making activities will figure among the subjects of “Let’s Make the Water Turn Black” on the Money album; that song will also cut momentarily to the voice. It figures into the Lumpy Gravy plot as a “little pig with wings” (even though it sounds more like a goat with emphysema).

The pig will fly around inside the piano again on Civilization, Phaze III. In 1974, Frank will record a long, comical piece called “The Adventures of Greggery Peccary,” concerning a pig who sits in his office and comes up with trends to sell to the gullible consumers of the world. When talking about the pigs not being able to question any part of their system, lest their livelihoods be threatened (the perspective-clouding “smoke” must remain), Spider mentions “that thing on their neck,” a precursor to the tie markings on Greggery.

“Merry-Go-’Round” was a song by Wild Man Fischer, a discovery of Zappa’s who would eventually record the tune for an album on Frank’s Straight label. A funny-farm alumnus, Fischer wrote simplistic, nursery rhyme-type tunes. Spider’s statement about robotic servitude, presumably to either work or fashion — “The thing is to put a motor in yourself” — refers back to Motorhead’s automobile tales earlier on the album, as well as “Merry-Go-‘Round.”

Louie’s excited recount of ponies trying to kill him ends up as a joke, when he talks about picking up sticks to throw at his assailants, and Roy interrupts with “Pick-Up Sticks?”. Mentioning the childhood game refers back to the groping for innocence in “Merry-Go-‘Round,” as well as Motorhead’s earlier line about getting “another pickup.” (Even this could be double-edged, considering the nature of his recollections; girls are “picked up.”)

Roy’s “Amen” is included as a reference to the name of the studio, Apostolic. The stanza that ends with “Just one more time” features Captain Beefheart’s vocals from Studio Z, circa 1963.

Chris Federico

Permalink Leave a Comment

Rolling Stone – “Grateful Dead Records” (1967)

September 24, 2009 at 7:11 pm (Music, Reviews & Articles, The Grateful Dead)

 

A Nov. 23, 1967 news item from the 2nd issue of Rolling Stone. Writer unknown (could be Jann Wenner…?). Notice 2 things in this brief article – the misspelling of “New Potato Caboose” and mention of Simon & Garfunkel possibly working with The Dead, on what was to eventually become their Anthem of the Sun album…  

 

The Grateful Dead hopes to have some new records out soon, particularly a single in November and an LP in January. If the group obtains the approval of Warner Brothers, the January release will be a two-record set chock full o’ goodies.

Some of the titles already recorded for the LP include “Alligator,” “No Potato Caboose,” and “Dark Star.” The single is an as yet unnamed original tune.

Live tracks may also be included. Warner Brothers is setting up an eight-track remote tape unit at concerts the Dead are doing November 10 and 11 at the Shrine Auditorium in Los Angeles. The Dead hopes to include a marching band on their LP and make use of the arranging talents of Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel, who have indicated a desire to help the Dead while in Los Angeles during November.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »