Neil Peart – “The Enemy Within” (1984)

August 31, 2009 at 7:06 pm (Poetry & Literature)

Things crawl in the darkness
That imagination spins
Needles at your nerve ends
Crawl like spiders on your skin

Pounding in your temples
And a surge of adrenaline
Every muscle tense –  
To fence
The enemy within

I’m not giving in
To security under pressure
I’m not missing out
On the promise of adventure
I’m not giving up
On implausible dreams –  
Experience to extremes –  
Experience to extremes

Suspicious-looking stranger
Flashes you a dangerous grin
Shadows across your window –
Was it only trees in the wind?

Every breath a static charge –  
A tongue that tastes like tin
Steely-eyed outside to hide the enemy within…

To you-is it movement or is it action?
It is contact or just reaction?
And you-revolution or just resistance?
Is it living, or just existence?
Yeah, you-it takes a little more persistence
To get up and go the distance…

Neil Peart

Permalink Leave a Comment

President Obama’s Weekly Address (Aug. 29, 2009)

August 30, 2009 at 9:05 am (Life & Politics)

Permalink Leave a Comment

The 13th Floor Elevators – “Easter Everywhere” (1967)

August 28, 2009 at 3:34 pm (Music, Reviews & Articles)

A November 1967 Newsday review by Scott Holtzman on the 2nd Elevators album.
Note: towards the end of the review Holtzman makes mention of 2 pictures of Roky Erickson and Tommy Hall that were printed with the review…

 

Just when everyone else is thinking about Thanksgiving and Christmas around the corner, the unpredictable 13th Floor Elevators come out with a new album Easter Everywhere.

This doesn’t surprise anyone, because there is a musical charisma which follows The Elevators everywhere they go. Everyone knows they have adopted Houston as their headquarters, but does anyone feel that they are from anywhere in particular? Did they rise as Druid spirits from the mists of Stonehenge on some dark All Hallows Eve? Were they conjured up one full moon from the dark swamps of Louisiana by Marie Laveau, the high priestess of voodoo? Or, are they aliens from Planet X offering us mirror-images of something hidden deep within our subconscious?

Witness a lyric from their new LP:

“Higher worlds that you uncover – Light the path you want to roam – You compare there and discover – You don’t need a shell of foam – Twice born Gypsies care and keep – The nowhere of their former home – They slip inside this house as they pass by – Four and twenty birds of Maya – Baked into an Atom you – Polarized into existence – Magnet heart from red and blue – To such extent the realm of dark – Within the picture it seems true – But slip inside this house and then decide.”

That’s from “Slip Inside This House” by Tommy Hall and Roky Erickson and is just a small sample of the lyric content of the album.

The saddest thing about the album is that the presence on the singers is so cloudy that unless you follow the lyric sheet thoughtfully provided with the album, you won’t realize just how well these young men are writing.

“Splash 1” came from their songbag, but it took the slick commerciality of The Clique to make it Number 1 in this area. The funny thing about it is that The Elevators themselves are commercial, but some unknown element hides Roky Erickson’s excellent singing abilities. As a listener, I want the singer to get more personal with me. I don’t want his voice hidden so often behind the musical jug, which has become identified as their sound, but is growing tiresome from over-exposure. When I hear The Elevators’ tapes over giant speakers, I get that personal feeling, but somehow it is lost in the translation from tape to disc on a small machine in the home.

Don’t get me wrong. This album is a must for any Elevator fan. In fact, it is already the fastest rising LP in Houston. It has many songs in it. My favorites are “Dust,” “I Had to Tell You,” “Slide Machine,” and “She Lives in a Time of Her Own.” I don’t know which one will be their new single, but there’ll be several left for you groups (who have no writers) to choose for your own singles as did The Clique.

These pictures of Roky and Tommy are by Bill Metzler and are the first ever released besides those on the back of the new album. It’s amazing a group can become so well-known nationally with no publicity pictures ever released before.

That alone shows how far these boys have come on sheer musical ability. They deserve every bit of it, wherever they came from.  

Scott Holtzman

Permalink 1 Comment

Texting While Driving PSA

August 26, 2009 at 1:03 am (Life & Politics)

Something that all of us should be forced to watch…not just teenagers. It’s graphic…but very realistic.

Permalink 2 Comments

John Tobler – “The Rick Nelson Story” (1974)

August 25, 2009 at 6:10 pm (Music, Reviews & Articles)

This in-depth article comes from the August 1974 issue of ZigZag magazine. Rick(y) Nelson was one of the more underrated singers of the early rock & roll era…  

 

Part 1: The Imperial Years 

To write a fully comprehensive article on the life and music of Rick (y) Nelson would take a book, and since this has got to be ready for the next ZigZag, then a book is out of the question.

What’s more, no one has ever asked me to write a book (Cries of “Shame!” from relieved onlookers.) Another problem affecting the fullness of this work is that I don’t have all Nelson’s records by any means. In most other cases, such an admission would preclude me from writing on the chosen subject, but when you consider that he has made, according to my reckoning, twenty-nine albums so far, spanning seventeen years from June 1957 when ‘I’m Walkin”/Teenager’s Romance’ was the first Nelson top ten single, when the man himself was three years and one day older than me, as he always was and always will be, but was probably less sensitive than I about his advancing age, it’s not quite as bad as it sounds. What a dreadful sentence!

Anyway, it’s time, as they say, to begin at the start, so here’s Rick talking about his… 

Early Days

“My mother’s name is Harriet Hilliard, and she was in a Fred Astaire film called Follow the Fleet, which made her a fairly big film star in the thirties. In fact, she started out singing with my dad’s band [Ozzie Nelson], and that’s where they met. As far as I’m aware, my father’s band was a big band dance thing, maybe Glen Millerish, and he and my mother started doing a lot of radio shows, like the Red Skelton Show, where my mother would play red’s mother in a skit, and my dad would get involved.

“That gave dad the idea for a family show, involving himself and my mother, but with other children playing the radio children’s parts, which is how it went on for about the first six years, until a Christmas show, which also featured Bing Crosby, whose kids were going to be on it. When Dave and I heard about it, ‘If their kids are going to be on it…’ and we went on that show. I was about seven and a half at the time, but it went pretty well, because I was kind of uninhibited about the whole thing – it was live, I couldn’t care less, I didn’t know what was going on, but I was having a good time.

“It was a nationally networked radio show, so it was a kind of natural progression to move into television, and for about a year, we did both radio and television shows, which meant a lot of work. The TV show ran from 1952 right through to 1966, and I was in it the whole time.” 

Overture 

“When I was sixteen, I was taking a girl on a date, and she said she was in love with a singer, so I decided to try to make a record. I did the song on the TV show, and that was before anyone knew the power that television has as far as exposure goes. I sang it on the show, and within that week it had sold a million, which was really incredible. I didn’t have to start at the bottom of the music business – quite the reverse, for after one week I had a million-selling record, and I was playing to thousands of people right away.”

Not a great deal of dues-paying there, I reckon, but only those who spent half their lives paying dues would insist on the necessity of same. Now the year, as we’ve said, is 1957, and Ricky was at Hollywood High School, and he was approaching his seventeenth birthday. Making a record seemed a reasonable thing to do, although why Verve should have been chosen is something which has been seemingly lost in the mists of time. He went into the studio with Barney Kessel, a jazz guitarist of the very highest class, who also made, a couple of years before, one of the most blisteringly brilliant records I’ve heard in any field, anytime, titled ‘Julie Is Her Name’ by Julie London, which deserves a reissue.

Ricky and Barney put down three tracks – ‘Teenager’s Romance’, written by one David Gillam; ‘I’m Walkin”, which was peaking in the charts right at that time in the Fats Domino version; and ‘You’re My One and Only Love’, a co-composition by Barney Kessel and someone called Marshall. The first record is a double A side of ‘Teenager’s Romance’ and ‘I’m Walkin” and gets to number 10 on June 24, and sells a million. If you doubt that a record which only made number 10 could sell a million, you should know that in 1957, there were no less than eighty-six million sellers.

“Verve didn’t pay me, so we went through a lawsuit, and they eventually had to pay, but in the meantime, I’d signed with Imperial, and Verve sued me because of that. But they had that third side ‘You’re My One and Only Love’, which they put out with some dumb instrumental on the back. It was recorded as a throwaway, because we had some more time left.”

Verve and Imperial put out Ricky Nelson records at just about the same time, it would seem. Certainly, when ‘Be Bop Baby’, the first Imperial record, was zipping up the charts to number eight at the end of October ‘57, ‘You’re My One And Only Love’ was reaching its own peak of number sixteen and not making gold disc status like its Imperial rival. Maybe that was due to the dumb instrumental, a description I’m unable to improve on. The title was ‘Honey Rock’, and I don’t believe you can buy it anywhere, which is probably just as well. ‘You’re My One and Only Love’ can be found on Carats Volume 3 – MGM Smash Hits, which is still available through Polydor. I had a hand in compiling that album, and had I been invited to continue with the rest of the series, I would have been able to plug a subsequent volume in the Carats series, which would have contained the two titles from that first Verve single. However, ’twas not to be – perhaps Malcolm Jones will oblige on some later golden epic.

A large part of the Nelson myth is the fact that his guitarist for the most successful part of his rock’n'roll time was James Burton. Of course, more about him later, but it wasn’t always Burton on whom Ricky relied…

“When I started to sing on the TV show, there was no James Kirkland, James Burton, Gene Garth or Richie Frost. On the first album, the lead guitarist was a guy called Joe Maphis, but James Burton was playing rhythm guitar. I also played rhythm guitar on those early albums – with four and a half chords!”

Just to amplify a little, Kirkland played bass, and was later replaced (on records anyway), by the ubiquitous Joe Osborn, Gene Garth (sometimes known as Gene Graf, but I think my spelling’s right) was on piano, and Richie Frost played drums. “I first met those guys, who were with me for ten years on the road, just after my very first gig at the Ohio State Fair, which was a very big occasion. The organisers of the Fair said that they would provide me with a band, so I went out there, and literally, it was Salvation Army band, who weren’t at all into what I was doing. This guy was playing his drum marching style, so I thought I’d better get a band together.

“One day, I was up at Imperial, and I heard this music coming from the outer office, backing Bob Luman, and it was James Burton and James Kirkland. When I heard that, I wanted them, because it was exactly what I had in mind, and it worked very well-they went on salary, so that they were always available for recording and going on the road.” 

The First Album 

Now with the first LP by a bloke like Ricky Nelson, there’s almost bound to be a good deal of plagiarism, both in the selection of material and the nicking of arrangements, but in listening to it, I can find a good many points of interest and reference, with which it is my intention to plague you at this point. Actually, I think it helps to put the early career of our man in some kind of perspective. It was called Ricky and was released in 1957. The first track is ‘Honeycomb’, and it’s taken at an easy pace, somewhat slower than either the American hit by Jimmie Rodgers, or the English near-hit cover version by Marty Wilde.

Mention of those two names leads me to inform you that Rodgers wasn’t his real name. In fact, it was Jimmie Rodgers Snow, and he’s the son of the famous Hank Snow, who I recently read had been with RCA for fifty years or something. Jimmie was actually a very good singer, purveying some good rock ‘n’ roll as well as some more straightforward stuff like ‘English Country Garden’, and I’m pleased to have a Best of Jimmie Rodgers album, which came out a couple of years ago on Polydor/Roulette, although it’s now deleted since Roulette went to Pye in Britain. Marty Wilde, on the other hand, seems to have been with Philips or Phonogram or whatever you like for almost as long as Hank Snow was with RCA, and I’ve got his version of ‘Honeycomb’ on a fantastically good value item called Wilde About Marty, which cost 49p and has a lot of his hits on.

(Just to completely confuse you, that’s not the same album as the original (1958) Wilde About Marty, but anyway, I’m sure both are long deleted. If you’re interested in Marty Wilde, the cohorts of the amazing Nigel Grainge at Phonogram have just put out a good twenty-track album called Good Rockin’ – Then and Now, which also contains most of Marty’s hit, although unaccountably it misses out ‘Honeycomb’. Reverting to the subject, Ricky’s version isn’t as good as either Jimmie’s or Marty’s, although the dreadful guitar solo on Marty’s is run close by the equally nauseous male backing vocals on Ricky’s. Finally, to save the inevitable correspondence, Marty Wilde is now on the Magnet label, of Alvin Stardust notoriety.

Second track is ‘Boppin’ the Blues’, of Carl Perkins fame. Ricky’s version is very much an early white rock ‘n’ roll track with classically obvious backing, enlivened by a neat guitar solo, presumably by the aforementioned Mr Maphis, who is, I believe a well known Hollywood session guitarist. That’s where you pause to check out your album sleeves, and then we get on to ‘Be Bop Baby’, which was the hit off this album. According to Joseph Murrell’s Daily Mail Book of Golden Discs (a kind of equally essential early relative of Lillian Roxon’s Encyclopaedia of Rock), ‘Be Bop Baby’ didn’t go gold till 1960. Perhaps it’s because of the woefully bad ending… ‘Have I Told You Lately That I Love You’ is of course of blatant rip-off of the Elvis version, and more fuel for the fire that says that Nelson was a pale clean Presley (a camp to which I don’t subscribe, by the way). It’s probably worth saying that the Elvis version comes from what I would imagine to be a very rare EP, which also has the alternate take of ‘Don’t Leave Me Now’ (different from the ‘Jailhouse Rock’ version), and also Elvis ripping off Fats Domino on ‘Blueberry Hill’ (they were all doing it, weren’t they?).

‘Teenage Doll’ is the sort of song which comes last in the Eurovision Song Contest, and deserves nothing better, but fortunately ‘If You Can’t Rock Me’, written by Little Walter, is pretty good. The words seem a little bit heavy for a seventeen years old to be singing, but perhaps we should be charitable and say that maybe the double-entendres were only single and he took the song at face value. More to the point, the song boasts a guitar solo which must have formed the basis for literally thousands of subsequent guitarists’ efforts, both recorded and amateur. Nice.

The second side kicks off with ‘Whole Lotta Shakin”, and it would be churlish to expect anything other than a pale Jerry Lee imitation. Again, though, you get a great guitar solo, and very useful bass fills – and I suppose that when you consider the raunchiness and general attitude of J.L.L., maybe Ricky was a cleaner, pleasanter rocker who might appeal much more to the ladies whose fellas were adoring Lewis – ‘Baby I’m Sorry’ is a routine song, with a Jordanaires backing vocal sound, and should be categorised as an Elvis reject, while ‘Am I Blue’ is brilliant in its instrumental beginning, though as soon as the vocal enters they turn the guitar down. An early piece of overkill production, almost rescued by some nice handclaps, up to Fats Domino standard.

‘I’m Confessin” was later recorded by Frank Ifield, and maybe he listened to this version, because Ricky comes on like a ’50s Val Doonican. The good version of this is by Nino Tempo and April Stevens (whatever happened? etc), and Ricky goes into a very nasty talking bit. At one point the track nearly stops, then unluckily, it restarts. No way. (Nino Tempo, while we’re mentioning him, is one of the more forgettable artists in Rock Around the Clock, but had several very worthwhile hits around the early ’60s.) ‘Your True Love’ isn’t the Jack Scott song (that was ‘My True Love’), but a Carl Perkins thing with a jumping introduction, and then what I think is a terrible guitar solo, although conceivably it might be in the “so bad it’s good” class.

Aficionados of ‘A Child’s Garden Of Grass’ will know what I mean if I mention ‘Myron Floren’ music. Still, this track has a good guitar outro, so maybe we’ll let it pass. The final crowning glory/insult (delete as applicable) is Ricky doing Bing and Grace on ‘True Love’, initially backed by simple (very) acoustic guitar, and what sounds like the Cliff Adams singers of ‘Sing Something Simple’ fame. Oh, Light Programme, where are you now? In all honesty, not a record to rush out and buy – not that you can, because its age alone should guarantee it obscurity – but an interesting curiosity and a yardstick by which to judge some of the glories which followed shortly afterwards. 

Two Through Six 

Which refers to the next five albums Ricky made for Imperial. Around this time, I reread the two transcripts I have of Rick Nelson interviews, and it seems that what he had to say about his early albums was more in general terms than anything specific, so I’ve borrowed several albums from the Nelson museum run by Rocky Prior, an old mate, and we’ll skip through them. After Ricky, you get Ricky Nelson, some kind of progress, I suppose. By this time, the famous band was with our man, yet the album still sounds as if it could have been a Marty Wilde record. From the first album, a single of ‘Be Bop Baby’ and ‘Have I Told You Lately That I Love You’ was released, and then came two singles, in England at least, which weren’t featured on albums at the time, a very strange state of affairs. These were ‘Stood Up’/’Waitin’ in School’ and ‘Believe What You Say’/ My Bucket’s Got a Hole in It’, all but the last of which are available on the Legendary Masters album, which we’ll no doubt get around to later. It was only the fourth single which came from this second album, and in fact that was one of the things for which Ricky is still highly thought-of even now – ‘Poor Little Fool’.

As far as I’m concerned, that track is by far the best thing on the album, and it’s still a classic in my book. Everything works, from Burton and Kirkland being correctly balanced, right through to the Jordanaires impersonators, who just for once are unintrusive. Interesting to note, then, that it was written by Eddie Cochran’s girlfriend, Sharon Sheeley, who nearly got hers when Eddie went to play lead with Buddy Holly. Anyway, rushing through the other tracks, we start with Bobby Lee Trammell’s ‘Shirley Lee’, a wild song with primitive backing and an almost Stan Freberg-like echo on the voice, Burton takes the first of several good solos, although the track is somewhat trebly, but the most interesting thing about it is Bobby Lee, who I believe to have been a kind of wild Screamin’ Jay Hawkins type and a bit freaky.

The only thing of Trammell’s I have is a Sue single called ‘New Dance in France’, and although that’s not terribly wild, I’d be interested to hear some more stuff by him. Next comes the follow-up single to ‘Poor Little Fool’, ‘Someday’, which I’m sure you know is a stable pub song, with boring organists doing their “All together now! ‘Someday, I’ll want you, to want me…” It’s fact that the song could hardly escape, and even Burton plays his solo as straight as he can. Oh well. ‘Good Rockin’ Tonight’, by Elvis out of Roy Brown, is nothing more than a Presley rip-off. Nevertheless, Kirkland’s bass is great, Burton does his usual fine solo, and there’s good syncopated passage. But all told, it’s a bit thin. Perhaps what I feel about ‘I’m Feelin’ Sorry’ applies to this one as well – if you haven’t heard the original (by Jerry Lee Lewis out of Jack Clement), then it’s an ace track. ‘Down the Line’ is at least sung a little differently from the Lewis version. It’s clean, maybe as if Nelson doesn’t quite mean it, but a bit of echo and the inevitable Burton goodie keep it the right side of mediocre. The end of the first side is ‘Unchained Melody’, done, as you know, by everyone from Jimmy Young to the Righteous Bros. Need I say more than that Ricky very nearly finds an exact middle point between the extremes. ‘Everyone Else’s Hits By Ricky’ continues with ‘I’m in Love Again’, which Fats Domino does infinitely better.

Better by far is ‘Don’t Leave Me This Way’, which was the flip of ‘Poor Little Fool’ and is one of the few distinctive songs on the album. It was written by Ricky, probably the earliest of his compositions to be recorded, end it’s still good now. Of course, the guitar solo is wonderful, very typical of the sort of stuff on which the legend is based. From this point, the record generally improves, with ‘My Babe’, later the B side of the ‘Lonesome Town’ single, and in my opinion, one of the better versions of an overused song. I’ll pass over ‘I’ll Walk Alone’, a Val Doonican-‘y try at the Elvis ballad technique which falls, and get on to ‘There Goes My Baby’ (not the Drifters’ song), written by Kirkland and Burton. Although derivative, it’s a good rocker, with the writers doing well, and worth investigating. Then it’s ‘Poor Little Fool’, and that’s the end. A typical ’50s album by a single hit-maker – two hit singles, two sides, and a lot of filler. Also, you can detect the mascara on Ricky’s cover photo. Move over, Bowie, and let Ricky take over…

Before we get to Ricky Sings Again! (and can you believe those titles?), a swift word about the non-album singles. Both are double-sided classics, so why aren’t they on this LP? Both ‘Believe What You Say’ and ‘Waitin’ in School’ were written by the Burnette Bros, Dorsey and Johnny. They are dynamite, and so is ‘Stood Up’ particularly. The inclusion of these four tracks could have made the album a solid gem.

Maybe something like that occurred to somebody, because ‘Believe What You Say’ does make it to the third album. It’s joined by another B side, ‘Never Be Anyone Else But You’, and the next two A sides, ‘Lonesome Town’ and ‘It’s Late’, but they missed another one off which should have been on there, ‘I Got a Feeling’, which was the B side of ‘Someday’. Really weird, the way his albums were programmed, and very annoying to find such tracks unavailable now.

There will now be a short intermission while I explain a couple of things that have come up since I wrote the above a couple of days ago. First thing was that I rang up the teenage rave of North Marston, Pete ‘Crazy Legs’ Frame, and expressed the opinion that it was pretty poor that ‘Stood Up’ and ‘Waitin’ in School’ had been missed off the first album. He muttered the usual Swahili curse, and assured me that they were, where upon we locked verbal antlers, and like a bad B movie, with half a screen each, shouted the titles at each other, his sleeve in his hand, mine in mine. We were both right – the English version has those two extra tracks, which are missing on the American version. The next bit of information came from Ray McCarthy, the Wandsworth Warrior, and also President, Chairman and members of the British Curt Boettcher Appreciation Society. Ray keeps showing me super-obscure records, and one of these was an EP titled Ricky Part 4, which consists of ‘Stood Up, ‘Waitin’ in School’, ‘Believe What You Say’ and ‘My Bucket’s Got a Hole in It’. The sleeve, identical to the Ricky album, and the Part 4 seem to indicate something or other, but it’s so confusing. Not improving on the situation is the fact that Ricky Sings Again features an advert for Ricky and Ricky Nelson, and the former doesn’t mention the two extra tracks even though the copy of Sings Again is an English one. So the man at Decca took the trouble to change the numbers on the American artwork, but it didn’t occur to him to check the titles. Oh, this is going on far too long – let’s hope it prevents a few letters anyway.

Now, the third album, and about time too. It’s significantly improved – much better recording level, a chunkier sound, a great record, which is certainly the best so far. ‘It’s Late’, a good song by Dorsey Burnette, should be familiar, and it has a magnificent instrumental sound which makes it a classic. Get it now, if you don’t have it. Also by Dorsey B is One of These Mornings’, which starts off with a great Sun/ Lincoln Carr bass sound, and seemed as if it might have been written for the Burnette Rock ‘n’ Roll Trio. Having checked it out, it wasn’t on either of the two excellent albums which I have of that group, but admires of that genre should listen to this Nelson track. ‘Believe What You Say’ is also ace, and another bit of info from Rocky Prior was that the single version was a different take from that on the album in the manner of being with/without the backing vocals. Both versions have a superb solo. One of the best, in fact, magnificent in its simplicity, and you can really hear the piano, which is nice. ‘Lonesome Town’, written by Baker Knight, and the first of his many song writing credits through the Nelson career, is just beautiful.

Of this album, Rick says: “I was happy with the track I put down for Imperial, but you can’t say they hold up now, because of the improvement in recording techniques. I still like ‘Believe What You Say’ a lot, because it had a certain sound about it, and ‘Lonesome Town’ has never shamed me. It was one of the first songs that just had an acoustic guitar, which I played myself, which was amazing! That’s a good example of trying out a song many different ways, but coming back to the simplest.”

I can still remember the great thrill I had when I discovered the chord sequence to ‘Lonesome Town’. It meant that my Lonnie Donegan repertoire could finally be expanded. I also recall a very good version of the song by Josh White and his son on the TV several hundred years ago. ‘Tryin to Get You’ is a good indication of the way things had changed by the time of this album. Not a straight Elvis copy, but a fairly individual version, with a somewhat Commander Codyish rhythm. (Oh yeah, I’ve seen Cody twice now, and I didn’t think they were that good. Still, I’ll keep trying.) The final and least good track on the first side is ‘Be True to Me’, which is fairly stilly, but rescued by the Burton solo and the better recording quality. ‘Old Enough to Love’ which starts off side two, is also a little below the high standard set by this LP, but it could certainly have been an Everly Bros album track. Then comes ‘Never Be Anyone Else But You’, the other side of ‘It’s Late’, with Burton’s chunka-chunka guitar, which is another classic and part of every party troubadour’s singalong set, until the middle eight, that is. ‘I Can’t Help It’ is OK too, with more Western Swing rhythms, and an interesting solo, to say the least, unconventional, from J.B. ‘You Tear Me Up’ is a very Presley-like rocker with a sizzling intro, and is recommended to Elvis people, while ‘It’s All in the Game’ is a straight cover of Tommy Edwards’ million seller, which was probably a hit when this album was being recorded.

A sideways step here, to talk about the final track, a Johnny Cash song titled ‘Restless Kid’. There was a theory about it – “The story about ‘Restless Kid’ being cut out of Rio Bravo isn’t really correct, because it was never really in the film,” Rick says. “I remember going over to Dimitri Tiomkin’s house, and he had a song that he’d written for the film that I really didn’t care for at all, and I had this song that Johnny Cash had written that I wanted in. The song just came about from talking to Johnny one night. I used to live near him in California, and saw him quite a lot, and when I told him about the story of the film, and that I was having trouble getting a song together, he wrote the song.” In fact, Rio Bravo is an ace film, and the stars are John Wayne, Dean Martin and Ricky. See it if you can – a classic western.

Going back to the song, it’s pretty good, although obviously a Cash song, mostly, due to the Tennessee Two backing sound, and finishes off a very fine album which I would wholeheartedly recommend. It’s taken a long time to get to the fourth album, but I reckon it gets a bit quicker now. This one, Songs by Ricky, isn’t as good as its immediate predecessor. One single, ‘Just a Little Too Much’/’Sweeter Than You’, is excellent, with five other reasonable tracks and five duffers. Of interest are the fact that there are five Dorsey Burnette songs, three of which (‘Just a Little Too Much’, ‘Don’t Leave Me’, and ‘I’ve Been Thinkin’ ) are good, three Baker Knight songs (‘You’ll Never Know What You’re Missing’, ‘One Minute to One’ and ‘Sweater Than You’), all of which are good, plus ‘Half Breed’, not as in Cher, but by John D. Loudermilk. The rest is fairly nasty, but I should note that ‘You’ll Never Know What etc’ was covered here by Emile Ford, whose brother now plays in Medicine Head. Not a totally recommended album.

I expect you’re saying to yourselves, “How can he only spend a few lines on that one, when he spent loads more on the earlier ones?” The answer is fairly simple – in the same way that every artist eventually goes over the top, Ricky was on a downhill side. All the innovation was no longer noticeable in artistic terms. The songs were patchy as far as whole album went, and excitement turned to being routine. Also, I’m finding that the music is less inspirational to me personally.

Still, we must press on, with More Songs by Ricky. Four good tracks, one that’s halfway there, and seven of junk. The key is at the top of the titles – ‘Musical Arrangements by JIMMIE HASKELL’, it says. He tries so hard to earn his money that he gave poor old Rick the castration treatment. The good tracks are ‘Ain’t Nothin’ But Love’, and ‘Proving My Love’, both by Baker Knight, ‘Hey Pretty Baby’, by Dorsey Burnette, which is the best track on the record, and ‘Make Believe’, by someone called Marie. The halfway one is also by Baker Knight, and is called ‘I’m All Through With You’, but is taken over by the strings to a certain extent. The rest of it is pure schmaltz, cabaret-club dung, and the best thing about the record, apart from the tracks mentioned, is the sleeve, which has a lot of pix with captions like “Rick, like so many young people, today, an avid camera fan, seldom goes anywhere without his Kodak”; or “The studios refrigerator is always well stocked with Rick’s favorite drink – Coca-Cola.” Finally, “If it has wheels and moves fast, Rick likes it. Here he’s trying out Dave’s motorcycle on the studio lot.”

Now, I sincerely don’t want you to think that I’m mocking or knocking – remember, at the time of this, the fifth LP, he was still only twenty, and I expect he was the victim of every possible manipulation by those making money out of him. Having met the man, I’m sure that he wouldn’t have done all that cabaret stuff if he hadn’t been forced to, and the whole thing stinks of total hype, as if the manipulators were trying to move their boy quickly into the Las Vegas circuit, so that they could afford their second yacht. They’ve damn near disposed of Burton, chopped bits off the male chorus and made them into females, and given Ricky songs his granny might like. The result – no singles from the album, and no success.

The mention of singles provokes a list. The following singles were not released on LP at the time: ‘Mighty Good’/’I Wanna Be Loved’, ‘Young Emotions’/’Right By My Side’, ‘Yes Sir That’s My Baby’/’I’m Not Afraid’, ‘Milk Cow Blues’/’You’re the Only One’, before LP number six, Rick Is 21, which contains ‘Hello Mary Lou’ and ‘Travellin’ Man’. After that, you get ‘A Wonder Like You’/Everlovin”, ‘Young World’, ‘Teenage Idol’/’I’ve Got My Eyes on You’ and ‘It’s Up to You’/’I Need You’. Sort of reminds you of the Roy Wood situation a bit, doesn’t it? Another small curio comes around this time, an EP called Ricky Sings Spirituals. Two songs by Baker Knight, two by Ricky himself (or at least by someone called Nelson), and a very up-front female backing chorus. I’m afraid that neither spiritually or musically is it very inspired – in fact, as soon as it’s finished, you feel you’ll never really want to play it again. Perhaps the motivation is again that Elvis copy thing, which I’m sure Ricky never really subscribed to.

Again, it smells like manipulation, but I’ve got a quote on the subject. “I wasn’t trying at all to be Elvis when he was in the army, and my Spirituals EP wasn’t supposed to be a direct crib from his. There may be a lot of truth in the rumour that I was welcome as a cleaned-up Elvis, because I was a few years youngster, so there was a large group of younger people who were left out of identifying with Elvis. I was on a family show, and people considered us part of their family, with TV coming right into their homes. I never set out to necessarily capitalize on what I was – if anything. I wanted to be a dirty rock ‘n’ roll singer, but I had no choice. It’s people who make up that image – I still go through all that stuff about Ricky and Rick, but I never really cared, and every other article I read about myself starts off, ‘Rick, as he is now known…and I go, Oh Yeah’. My real name is Eric, which should blow a few minds.”

It seems kinda obvious that More Songs by Ricky was a washout when you hear Rick Is 21. It won’t be mentioned again, but this is where the name changed, and the style of the music reverts strongly to the third album, I reckon. The songwriters are interesting – Dorsey Burnette gets the first track, ‘My One Desire’, and Jerry Fuller makes his first appearance as a writer, a significant point when you consider that he wrote ‘(It’s a) Young World’ and ‘It’s Up to You’, as well as ‘Travellin’ Man’, which is on this album, together with a perfectly amazing track called ‘Break My Chain’ which has just has a blistering Burton solo.

Inevitably, there’s some rubbish here, presumably to keep Haskell employed, such as ‘Do You Know What It Means to Miss Orleans’, but much of the stuff here is of a standard above average. Oh, there’s a couple of other interesting songwriters – Dave Burgess, once a member of the Champs, and an up-and-coming young land named Gene Pitney. Hands up, all those who knew that he wrote ‘Hello Mary Lou’, which has perhaps the best-known bit of Burton guitar from this period. Six of the tracks here are good, three so-so, and only three bad, including the aforementioned ‘New Orleans’ and a totally misplaced ‘Stars Fell on Alabama’. A strange LP, but with more good things than bad.

At this point, I’ve just re-read Ed Ward’s sleeve notes on the Legendary Masters album, and he puts this album down as being “comprised largely of seeming leftovers,” with which I can’t really agree, because it’s probably the next best album after the third one.

This marathon is coming to an end, the end of the first era. Before we go any further with the last album, Album Seven, and the compilations, there are a few things Rick said which belong in this period, so here’s a good place to put them in. 

James Burton 

It would be nice to be able to put in a lot about the man who made Ricky’s albums nearly as famous as Ricky did, but life’s not like that, unfortunately. However, Rick isn’t a very loquacious person, and I think he’d agree to that.

“Nobody knew James before he joined me. It was his first time in town from his previous experience on Louisiana Hayride. He had a certain sound, and he was the front runner of a lot of guitar styles, which people don’t even realise now. He was the first one with a Telecaster and the first one to put banjo strings on his guitar. It finally happened that James was making more money playing sessions, and the same went for Joe Osborn (who replaced James Kirkland on bass around 1961). James really got to be a security for me at one time, to the extent where I didn’t know whether I could do a show without him. It got to the point where he wasn’t available to go on the road – if you start playing sessions, and then you leave for a time, they just get someone else. It’s a producer’s clique that you have to get in, and so he just wanted to stay there. Now that James is with Elvis, it’s not really like being on the road, because he normally only plays Las Vegas. It’s a joke between Elvis and me – so you finally got James, then! – although he had Scotty Moore, who was also extremely good. In fact, Scotty almost came with me in those early days when he was with D.J. Fontana and Bill Black.” 

Songwriters 

“Most of the songs I got were by writers I didn’t know, but Baker Knight, who gets a lot of songwriting credits over the years, was a great friend of mine. I always chose my own material. Quite often, James would appear with some record, or someone would send it in. For example, Gene Pitney recorded ‘Hello Mary Lou’ about a year and a half before he gave it to me, when he used to do a lot of demos, for Aaron Schroeder, I guess. It’s not true that I used the name of Jerry Fuller as a songwriting alias. He’s now a producer for Columbia, I think, and he certainly produced the Union Gap. He started off as a vocalist, and had a couple of hits in the states. He took ‘Travellin’ Man’ to Sam Cooke originally, and a while before Sam died, I met him, and he said he was really sorry he hadn’t done that one. It was laying around for a year before anything was done about it.” 

Album Seven 

After several albums where backing musicians were not mentioned, this sleeve lists the Nelson band, which by now had James Burton and Richie Frost from the original group, while Kirkland and Garth were now replaced by Joe Osborn and Ray Johnson. It’s worth nothing that only Nelson and Presley bothered to name-check the lads who were part of their success story, and look what’s happened nowadays… trail-blazing indeed. Even so, there’s an element of déjà vu about this album, which Ed Ward feels was the last genuine album that Rick made for imperial. I don’t know whether that’s true or not because the Legendary Masters mentions one called ‘It’s Up to You’, which conceivably contains some of the ‘Young World’ stuff as well as the title track, but I’m fairly certain that it wasn’t put out here. Still, there’s no way that Album Seven could be described as bad – it’s just the same as before, but with somewhat inferior songs, although one can’t say that about the excellent version of Gershwin’s ‘Summertime’ which is very gripping. Generally, though the songs are of a novelty, banal type, the only other exception being ‘Today’s Teardrops’, which was also the B side of Roy Orbison’s ‘Blue Angel’, my familiarity with that showing where I was at in the autumn of 1960. But as far as England went, that was the end of an era, the last Rick Nelson album to come out on the famous London label. 

Reissues 

Two important ones, one for hard-up folks, and the other a prestige package. The cheapie is The Very Best of Rick Nelson, which is a straight budget price reissue of Million Sellers. You get sixteen of the tracks we’ve mentioned, and all for about a pound. Excellent value, and a very fine introduction to the work of Mr Nelson. For the more ambitious among you, Ricky Nelson, in the Legendary Masters series, is a twenty-six-track double album with even more goodies, split up as follows: from the first album, two tracks, from the second, five; third, eight (excellent!); fourth, two; fifth, none; sixth, three; seventh, none; plus six odd tracks which were singles. At this point, I’d like to point out a small mistake in Ed Ward’s otherwise praiseworthy sleevenote, and that is that the track ‘A Long Vacation’ – the title track of one of the later repackaged albums – was not new and comes from the fourth album. That was one of several cash-in type albums released after Rick had left Imperial for Decca, and the most horrid of these is one called Rick Nelson Sings For You, which was put out at the same time as an album of new material on Decca called Sings For You. Very scrupulous, these record people… 

End of Part One 

We’ll leave the final words of this rambling episode to Rick. “I joined Imperial for five years, and when that time was up, I signed with Decca for twenty years, and as I’m apparently enjoying some kind of revival at the moment it’s not unexpected to see the Legendary Masters. I quite like them, in fact, but I wish they hadn’t split it up into stereo, because really there are basically only three or four instruments most of the time, and they were mostly recorded on one-track machines anyway. I don’t think the Legendary Masters are a big deal in the States but for what it is, it’s done very well, and they guy who wrote the notes was very good. I don’t regard it as competition between my old and new images, because I can’t pretend I didn’t do those things. As long as people put it in the right perspective…”

Hmm. Wonder if I did? Next issue, the middle period, covering the first seven or eight Decca albums. Bye for now. 

Part 2: Brunswick/MCA… Before the Stone Canyon Band 

Before we start, and you take the two-part exam (oral and written) on the content of the first part of this epic, a few little oddments that have come up since then. First concerns Joe Maphis, who was (all together now) ‘the guitarist on the first album’. Right, very good, Peter O’Brien (also known as Omaha Knox) thrust into my hand a Joe Maphis album, a fairly ancient one called Fire on the Strings, which has a magnificent ’50s-type picture on the sleeve. Note the twin-necked Mosrite, with ‘Joe’ on the upper neck, and ‘Maphis’ on the lower, and also note that if you can visualise him without his hat, he looks a little like John McLaughlin’s father might appear, even if he didn’t have a twin-necked thingy.

Don’t rush around looking for the LP, though, because it’s frankly for Arthur Smith fans only, and quite sub-Ventures. Thank you, Peter, for the loan and don’t forget, folks, Omaha Rainbow is where you’ll find all the latest on John Stewart. The second point is that this time we’re going to steam through no less than 11 of Rick’s albums – dauntless readers continue, while others may make paper darts. For Your Sweet Love came out in May 1963. The only real change since what went before is the label. Brunswick in its early days was the American Decca Company’s English outlet, and of course Bill Haley was on it. There is still a Brunswick operating through English Decca, but it seems to be Brunswick/Dakar, a different thing altogether, the label for artists like the Chi-Lites. So when Rick said he’d signed with Decca for twenty years, he didn’t mean the merry lads at Albert Embankment, but in fact the Music Corporation of American, now tied with Universal Studios. All this explains why Alias Smith and Jones has an MCA logo at the end of it.

Now the record. Of the twelve tracks, I made three good, three OK, and the rest below-standard. Dorsey Burnette was by now writing with Joe Osborn, although in fact brother Johnny didn’t die until 1964. I suppose he was too busy performing to continue writing with his brother, and I think his toughness might have helped ‘Gypsy Woman’ and the frantic ‘Every Time I See You Smiling’ to get into the good rather than the OK class. Burton, of course, blesses both songs with fine introductions, but there’s still a bit of something missing. Another stalwart, Jerry Fuller, also contributes an OK track, ‘For Your Sweet Love’, which comes on a bit like ‘Travellin’ Man Part Two’, and there’s also a ‘Poor Little Fool Part Two’ in ‘String Along’, although the writers involved are not the same.

The other two good ones, apart from ‘String Along’, are ‘Let’s Talk the Whole Thing Over’ and ‘I Got a Woman’, the latter of which is not quite the Elvis version, but has a great bass line and a fab solo. Listening to the record, one gets the distinct impression that the subject matter is identical to previous Nelson hits, but the songs generally fail to come through with the same strength, as if the writers were trying to create a specifically Rick Nelson type of song. In fact, three of the tracks mentioned, ‘I Got a Woman’, ‘String Along’ and ‘Gypsy Woman’ were single A sides of the time, although none of them were top ten. Quickies on some of the other tracks – ‘One Boy Too Late’ was written by Tony Powers and Ellie Greenwich, who, with Phil Spector, also wrote ‘Today I Met the Boy I’m Gonna Marry’. ‘What Comes Next?’ has a chorus like the bom-boms which herald I’m a Lumberjack’, and ‘I Will Follow You’ was the male version of Petula Clark’s ‘I Will Follow Him’. Altogether, not exactly a landmark. 

For You 

If it’s for me, I don’t mind, because it’s an improvement on the last one. Eight goods and three OKs only leaves the fairly unpleasant ‘You’re Free to Go’, the sequel to ‘He’ll Have to Stay’, which was of course, the sequel to ‘He’ll Have to Go’. These songwriters certainly keep plugging away with original ideas, don’t they?

Good old Jerry Fuller pops up again, with ‘Hey There Little Miss Tease’ (good) and ‘Just Take A Moment’ (OK), the latter co-written with one Cissi Wilson. Dave Burgess, the ex Champ, turns up again with ‘Hello Mister Happiness’, which has very good guitar-playing but a rather odd end (nevertheless good), and the three singles were ‘Down Home’, ‘For You’ and ‘That’s All She Wrote’ (good, OK, and good respectively). The first of those were written by Gerry Goffin and Carole King, and Rick’s treatment is very straight, nicely enhancing the undoubted strength of the song, and another fine writer, Don Gibson, about whom Briggles threatens to write an article shortly, is represented by ‘A Legend in My Time’. ‘Fools Rush In’ (you know, where angels fear to tread) is on this album too, and James Burton plays a solo which he also played later when Elvis did the song, and even again when his (Burton’s) solo album came out; more of that later.

The final track of the record is interesting in 1974, because it’s ‘The Nearness of You’ and what with Bryan Ferry murdering ‘Smoke Gets in Your Eyes’, and Gary Shearston bruce-ing ‘I Get a Kick Out of You’, it’s pretty nice to hear an ordinary version of a good song. In fact, the singing is a bit suspect at times, but Burton’s guitar work is exceptional, as opposed to outstanding. Yes, a nice album, and one to get if you can find it.

There will now be a short intermission while I quote from the sleevenotes of Rick’s first two albums under his new contract. First: “For Your Sweet Love is the first album to be released by Rick Nelson under the Brunswick label. Deftly performed by this talented young artist, his highly personal style and amazing versatility have never been shown to greater advantage. Each of the twelve sides has a different quality and feeling yet each bears the unmistakable sound that is uniquely Rick Nelson; his voice and his music.”

Second – “The amazing versatility of Rick Nelson was never more evident than on this, his latest release for the Brunswick label. Any one of the twelve selections could be a smash hit single on its own. This tremendously talented young artist handles all types of songs with equal ease and facility, without at any time losing his own personalised style. His distinctive and tasteful phrasing and vocal quality make it immediately evident that it is a Rick Nelson rendition.”

Notice the odd similarity? In all fairness, and changing the subject, I should note here that Jimmie Haskell, who was to my ears heavy-handed on the later Imperial albums as arranger and orchestra leader, reached on For You a near perfect balance with the backing group of Burton, Osborn, Frost and Johnson. The function of orchestras in rock ‘n’ roll seems to me to be necessarily non-intrusive, and this album contains no battles. So well done, Mr H. 

The Very Thought of You 

The very thought of me makes you yawn – what kind of welcome is that for a lad like me? Four good and one OK out of twelve takes us right back to the first album in this section. Listen to the sleevenote – ‘With The Very Thought Of You, Rick Nelson in a sense achieves the impossible… he tops himself. This is a great album, one of the best in the fabulous career of a young man admired the world over for his distinctive singing style and superb phrasing. His amazing versatility is once more in evidence as he presents a wide variety of exciting and interesting songs.” That makes three versatilities so far – is that a record? No, but what we’re discussing is, and you might call it the Ray Noble album, for that gent (a much-respected name in easy-listening circles) provided two of the songs, the title track, which is nasty, with a cha-cha treatment that Joe Loss might approve of, and ‘Love Is the Sweetest Thing’, which is OK, because it can withstand any sort of treatment.

Then there’s Dave Burgess again, with ‘The Loneliest Sound’ (good) and an also –ran called ‘I Love You More Than You Know’, which smacks of writing too many songs without enough good ideas. Charlie Rich comes into the picture with a good one called ‘Just A Little Bit Sweet’, and Barry Mann and Cynthia Weil’s ‘I Don’t Wanna Love You’ is also good, with a lovely guitar line. The other good one, which is again good Burton, is ‘I’ll Get You Yet’. Among the rest is ‘Be My Love’, yes, that which Mario Lanza sang in 1950 in Toast of New Orleans. Did you know that Mario’s real name was Alfred Arnold Cocozza? I thought not. Rick’s go at the song is sheer catastrophe, and his slow version of ‘Dinah’, with very dubious low notes and cocktail lounge piano is almost as bad as Joe Brown’s version is good. The Piano in fact gets very irritating by the instrumental break, and I wondered whether Burton was ill for his track… Finally, there’s something called ‘I Wonder (If Your Love Will Ever Belong to Me’), which was written apparently by five people. You would have thought that that many people could have come up with something, however meager… 

Spotlight on Rick 

This is the first one of this lot that Rocky Prior, who lent them all to me, had in stereo, and the sound is surely different, if primitive. This is a slight improvement on the previous one, even if the sleeve note says: “The spotlight will grow ever brighter on this outstanding young man, for with his marvelous versatility, charm, good looks, and vitality, the future holds more and more promise.” Maybe that’s a bit better too.

Right. Here we have ‘I’m Talking About You’, that Chuck Berry masterpiece, done here a la Ronnie Hawkins and therefore good. In fact, the track has all the depth of sound that some of Berry’s recordings seemed to lack even if Chuck’s problems were down to recording quality more than any thing else. Baker Knight returns to the writing scene with two good ones, ‘Yesterday’s Love’, which seems to be the ultimate B-side, and ‘Just Relax’, a very appropriate Nelson song, which could have been a hit had it been released as a single. Sonny Curtis’ ‘Don’t Breathe A Word’ would have been more appropriate for Bobby Vee, but it’s OK here; Jerry Fuller’s ‘I Tried’ is good, and there’s a ‘Just a Little Too Much’ Part 2 in ‘That’s Why I Love You Like I Do’, which you probably know is a line from the earlier song. Other notables are ‘I’m a Fool’, which sounds like the Everly Brothers singing ‘Game of Love’, and ‘A Happy Guy’, one of whose co-writers was Kenny Rankin. Wonder if it was THE Kenny Rankin? On the whole, an average LP. 

Best Always 

Burning through them now, aren’t we? This one won’t take long, because it’s basically a list of notable songwriters having their wares performed in a bland manner, and I don’t mean Bobby. Familiar songs are ‘You Don’t Know Me’ by Ray Charles out of Eddy Arnold, ‘I Know a Place’ by Petula Clark (again!) out of Tony Hatch, and ‘Since I Don’t Have You’ by, with and from the Skyliners. What cay you say about them? Respectively, nothing; the follow-up to the excellent ‘Downtown’; and a good song with near painful falsetto. Perhaps I should have included ‘My Blue Heaven’ in the familiar category, but it’s dreadful, with only Burton surviving. The drummer seems to have escaped from the Dave Clark drum school. I don’t think I’ll even mention the other writers – I don’t expect they remember their work with any great enthusiasm, and I feel the same about this album. 

Love and Kisses 

A curious sleeve picture on this one. Seemingly the album which goes with a film called Love And Kisses – two tracks from the film, with ten others. Here there are two very good things, next to each other on side two. First is ‘More’, the familiar song, but with a brilliant intro, a double-time instrumental break, and a lunatic drummer who sounds as if he might be speeded up. Then there’s ‘Raincoat In The River’, which is just a very interesting song, well-performed. Apart from that, the title track is a ‘Good Timin’’ rip-off, a good Burton solo on ‘Love Is Where You Find It’, an average version of a beautiful song in ‘Try To Remember’ (the kind of September), plus a lot of very average stuff that’s not worth much space and therefore won’t be getting any.

But we haven’t had a quote from Rick yet in this instalment, so here goes – on the subject of his film career, which started in 1952, with Here Come the Nelsons. “That was a film we did the year before the TV show, and from that film came the idea for the series,” he says. “The next year I had a small part in The Story of Three Loves, with Leslie Caron, But Rio Bravo was the most successful film I did, followed by The Wackiest Ship in the Army, with Jack Lemmon. Love and Kisses was a film that had been a Broadway show, a situation comedy. It was fairly successful in the States, but not totally. That was in my robot period, when I didn’t know what I was doing. You know, wind me up, and… the album from that film lacked direction and everything else, because I didn’t know what I wanted to do at all during that period.” Yeah. 

Improvement 

You may have noticed that the six albums so far discussed have been some what tatty – good points from time to time, but just as many bad ones. Well, maybe that thought occurred to our Rick too, because it’s about here that his “robot” period ended, and from this point on, despite the odd blind alley, everything improves.

The first of the albums in this section is called Bright Lights and Country Music (1966) and while the cover photo still leans back towards those “versatility” days, the music is generally infinitely better. It’s difficult to imagine a better song to start with than Terry Fell’s ‘Truck Drivin’ Man’. Burton is quite unbelievable on dobro, and Rick and everyone else sound so much happier. Really makes me beam to hear it, and it’s the kind of song that could be investigated with benefit by some of our better British country rock bands. In fact, one of the first of those, the much missed plainsong, were fans of Terry Fell, and said as much on one of the occasions I saw them playing.

Now on a record with a title like that, you wouldn’t expect to find a Nelson original, but the next one, ‘You Just Can’t Quit’ is just that, and it’s by no means put in the shade by the great country compositions surrounding it. A taste, perhaps, of the goodies to come in the last part of this saga, and again, you can hear Burton’s wild enthusiasm showing through. ‘Louisiana Man’ is next. I’ve never been an avid Doug Kershaw fan, although I can see the benefit of the song when it has a treatment like the one here; Even Jim Reeves can’t spoil this, but ‘Welcome to My World’ comes over as a bit bland – keep smiling though, because ‘Kentucky Means Paradise’ (probably not the restaurants, I suspect) is great again, beating ‘Louisiana Man’ at its own game.

The final track on a good side is ‘Here I Am’ which was written by Glen Campbell, and sounds like an Elvis song, especially when you read that the backing vocals are by the Jordanaires. Over we go, and ‘Bright Lights and Country Music’ is from the same league as ‘Truck Drivin’ Man’, and therefore ace. Willie Nelson’s ‘Hello Walls’ is next, and it’s a familiar song, as is ‘No Vacancy’, a Merle Travis thing. More Jim Reeves next, with ‘I’m a Fool to Care’, then another Willie Nelson, ‘Congratulations’, which is somewhat in the country corn bracket, but quite a good crying in the beer song. It has become fashionable to like Willie Nelson this year, which is fine and good, but Atlantic, who I believe have his contract, don’t seem to release anything here. Twelve Eddie Harris albums, perhaps, but no Willie Nelson? Anyway, Rick’s album sends up with ‘Night Train to Memphis’, a fantastic song with great picking, making altogether a superb track. 

On the Flip Side 

This is the album we don’t have anywhere. Rocky, to whom most of these records belong, has even advertised for this one, but without success. Does anyone out there have one, either to sell or lend? We’d be grateful enough to offer you a night out with Michael Wale, or Jim McGuire, or both, or even neither…We asked Rick about it – “Some of the tracks are ‘Moonshine’, ‘Your Kind of Lovin”, ‘Take a Broken Heart’, and ‘They Don’t Give Medals to Yesterday’s Heroes’, which came from a special I did, for which Burt Bacharach wrote the music. It was almost like music from a play, and I’m not on all the tracks. Joanie Somers was in it, and we do a duet…It was interesting to do a special, and the music was good, but Bacharach’s songs are very difficult to sing. Trying to learn them is really a trip, because I don’t read music, and they were really far out.” 

Country Fever 

Yes, some more of the goodies! Gib Gilbeau, yet, starts it off with ‘Take a City Bride’, and Rick sings the first verse in French, or maybe Cajun, man, while Burton’s dobro is making me run fast out of superlatives. ‘Funny How Time Slips Away’ was written by Willie Nelson again but the most famous version was by Joe Hinton. Rick’s version is almost as good, while ‘The Bridge Washed Out’ is a terrific song, but I’ve never heard of the writers. Again there’s a personal Rick song, ‘Alone’, and again it doesn’t produce a drop in quality, although perhaps ‘Big Chief Buffalo Nickel’ does, because it seems to be nonsense. ‘Mystery Train’ is the end of side one, and the backing is dynamite, less economical than Presley’s but with a superb Burton solo. Side two is even better. The songs are well chosen, singing and playing are well up to standard, and it’s a veritable peach. What do you say, Rick?

“When I made those two country LPs, they were reasonably successful, but I never got around to going out live on the country circuits. I didn’t want to get totally involved with that music, because it can be very confining, and all of a sudden, you can get to be know as strictly country. However, I always feel tremendously flattered that I’ve been accepted in that field, because it’s a very hard one to get into, if that’s you aim. Country rock has always been the most natural thing for me, and at that time, I didn’t know what kind of music I wanted to play, and had no direction musically, so I got the idea of going back to where I started from, with a basic band of very good musicians. It was a lot easier and simpler than all those arranged things I’d got into.”

Now both these two country albums are deleted, here and in the States, BUT you can still get them! About mid-1973, they were repackaged as a double album, unfortunately only available on import so far, called Rick Nelson Country (MCA 2-4004). You should have it, really. The best thing is if we all write to MCA at 84 Baker Street, and ask them nicely to put it out. It won’t take long, and it could save you a couple of quid, or even more. All right?

Anyway, was the double album your idea Rick? “Yeah, it was, they came to me, you know. It was my idea to do the country albums originally, about five or six years ago, and I recorded my favorite country songs of the time, and did them as country as I could, so that there wasn’t any copout with strings and all that stuff. I liked the way they came out at the time. Glen Campbell’s on there, playing bass, I think, and singing harmony and stuff, and James is playing dobro. It was a lot of fun recording those, and I’m glad they’re re-packaged. In fact, it wasn’t done to fill a gap between albums, but both those records had been deleted, so they were brought out again, as a double package. It’s the kind of thing that I don’t think gets dated, although I’ll probably be proved wrong eventually.”

No, Rick, dead right. They’re just great, and all you ZigZaglanders better get your pens and paper out… 

Another Side of Rick

More like another manipulation, although perhaps that’s being a little harsh. After those two excellent country albums, Rick took up with a couple of brothers called Boylan, John and Terry. They in their turn were mixed up with Koppelman and Rubin, about whom John Sebastian had words to say which we didn’t really like to mention in print. Now the latter two gents were tied up with several artists at the time, for example Tim Hardin, John Sebastian and John and Terry Boylan. So, Another Side of Rick has three Tim Hardin songs, one by John Sebastian, four by John Boylan and one by Terry Boylan, as well as a John Boylan collaboration with Rick Nelson. Do you begin to get the publishing picture?

Musically, the record doesn’t seem to make it. I can’t put my finger on it, but I reckon that basically it doesn’t sound like a Rick Nelson album. The Tim Hardin songs are just irrelevant versions to my ears, and most of the Boylan songs come over as twee. Being constructive about it, there is one excellent song by John Boylan, called ‘I Wonder If Louise Is Home’, and there’s something nice about ‘Promenade in Green’, the co-composition, that perhaps being the fact that Rick’s twin sons, Gunnar and Mathew, get name-checks in it. I won’t go into a lot more detail about the record, but an example of the bad vibes can be heard in ‘Georgia on My Mind’, which starts off quite slowly, pleasantly relaxed, until some loony gets in there and over-produces it with saxophones and Las Vegas orchestras and it dies miserably.

Not unconnected with all this is a record called Playback by the Appletree Theatre, which was out briefly on MGM, but is more than likely now deleted. I really couldn’t tell you what it’s all about, but maybe it’s a rock opera? This is 1967, you know, before Tommy, but around the same time as Simon Simopath, with which you should all be familiar (by Nirvana, you know). Playback seems to consist of a bunch of basically disconnected songs, talking bits and so on (stereophonic footprints and all that stuff), with odd amusing bits punctuated by long confusing bits. In fact, there are three songs on Another Side of Rick from Playback: the one I mentioned before (‘I Wonder If Louise is Home’), which is recited by someone who sounds like the comic detective in Macmillan and Wife (no, not Rock Hudson, he’s not supposed to be funny), and ‘Don’t Blame It on Your Wife’ and ‘Barefoot Boy’. The only other thing of interest to me about the Appletree Theatre is that their list of helpers included Larry Coryell, Joe Butler, Michael Equine, Chuck Rainey and Rick Nelson. Can’t hear the latter, though. To sum it all up, the Boylan songs don’t suit Nelson’s album, while the Theatre LP is so fragmented that, without explanation – which might have been given in an American fold-out sleeve – I just don’t know what it’s all about, Alfie. Ray McCarthy, mind you, who lent me the Nelson album, thinks both the albums are pretty neat and he has the kind of taste with which I don’t care to argue, as you’ll see when he starts writing in this mag soon.

Rick: “At one time I was involved with John and Terry Boylan, and apart from getting me into the Appletree Theatre record, John produced an album of mine called Perspective, and was also involved in Another Side of Rick. They were involved with Koppelman and Rubin, in that John was the liaison man, while Terry is a really good writer. The album with Hardin and Sebastian songs was done because I really liked the songwriting, and I didn’t know whether I could sign that sort of stuff. Actually, John Boylan was very influential on me doing those songs, as were Koppelman and Rubin, who were music publishers for Hardin and Sebastian. So I was introduced to them in that way, but I’m a big fan of both writers – I’m not sorry I did those things because, if anything, it made up my mind as to the way I wanted to go. Jack Nitzsche arranged ‘Don’t Make Promises’ and although it’s a very good arrangement, it doesn’t work for me. Perspective, with the Randy Newman songs was a total experiment, and those Steve Miller-type sound effects between the tracks were my idea.” 

Perspective 

The last album of Rick’s that we’ll be dealing with in this section. Again, the Boylans, or rather John Boylan, are involved in production and songwriting, but there are some very good songs on this one by writers like Nilsson (‘Without Her’), Paul Simon (‘For Emily Wherever I May Find Her’), Richie Havens, and – dominating the whole thing – Randy Newman, several of whose greatest hits are performed. With a bit more meat here, and a lot less wispiness in the production, this is really rather good, which makes it all the more surprising that it was never released here. There’s even a painting on the back by Mrs Nelson, Kristin and those sound effects referred to are pleasantish Hawkwind sort of noises, which so connect most of side two.

But it’s the Newman songs that dominate the album. ‘Wait Till Next Year’ has a lot of nattering people behind, while ‘Love Story’, which is one of the most amazing songs I’ve ever heard, is introduced by some one stereophonically sploshing about in some water. After that, a car drives away, then an aeroplane does the same, and ‘So Long Dad’ starts, and that’s another superb song. A bit of kids’ noise, and then a bit more of ‘Love Story’, then a thunderstorm heralding – well, what would you think? Yes, ‘I Think It’s Gonna Rain Today’, and while I don’t really approve of Rick’s phrasing, particularly with regard to the title line, this is a song that couldn’t be ruined, even by Bryan Ferry, if you see what I mean. A fine album, and fitting way to end this part of the story, on an up. 

One More Thing 

Yes, James Burton, who has featured fairly heavily thus far in the story, and with good reason. As Rick said in the previous part of this, “James really got to be a security for me at one time, to the extent where I didn’t know whether I could do a show without him.” Now anyone that reads this, and many more besides, like Mick Grabham, have the utmost respect for the man’s guitar playing – he’s among the top three guitarists there are, and he has been since 1957 or so, which is quite a time. So when a James Burton solo album came out a couple of years ago on A&M, a lot of us were holding our breaths. Unfortunately I don’t think it makes it as the scorcher I would have liked and expected, but Rick was more philosophical.

“I haven’t heard James’ solo album, but I can imagine it might not sound too good, because you can get trapped in doing sessions all the time,” he says. “That’s why I think it’s important to get out and play live, because sessions are very confining. He’s got into a thing of playing what’s needed to be played rather than creating. He’s such a talented musician, it’s a shame.” All I can really say about the Burton solo album is that it’s a repeat of many of the riffs that he created in the past behind various signers, and I suppose it goes to prove something that I’ve so far neglected to say – Rick Nelson and James Burton complemented each other quite perfectly, and without Rick’s voice, James seems kind of lost.

Undoubtedly, at this point in Rick’s career, that is, up to Another Side of Rick, his records would have been measurably worse without James, while without Rick, there might be no James Burton legend with quite the same strength the name holds today. And that’s all for this time, the middle (and least interesting) period being finished. Next time, up to date with Rick and the Stone Canyon Band. 

Part 3: The Stone Canyon Band 

The perceptive interviewer will very likely have noticed a certain reluctance on the part of the interviewee to speak about he past. This reluctance, which is sometimes an inability – more than a conscious desire – to speak about the past, increases exponentially (I believe the word is) the further back into the mists of time the interviewer attempts to travel. Which is a posh way of saying that there’s rather more actual interview in this final part of the Rick Nelson marathon than you’ve been used to.

Last time, we left Rick with an artistically, if not commercially, acceptable album called Perspective, and at yet another crossroads in his career. What should he do next? The teenage idol of the fifties and early ’60s was an amusing memory, and in all honesty, there wasn’t much happening in the way of anything. 

Formation: 

“Then I decided: I wanted to sing, but I couldn’t go back and record the same type of songs. I wanted to grow, to create and perform on my own without big studio arrangements; and for that I needed my own group again. We started to rehearse four and five days a week in a building my dad owns in Burbank. We improvised and experimented and listened to other people’s work, people like Randy Newman and Tim Hardin. Then one day I heard Nashville Skyline by Bob Dylan, and I knew where I wanted to go. I listened to that album for days – the songs were so simple, yet cryptic at times. I wanted to sing songs like that, and, if possible, also write like that. So for a year and a halt that’s all I did. We’d rehearse during the day, and I’d write at night.

“Our first major appearance was at the Troubadour in Hollywood, and the audiences were very enthusiastic. After that we appeared in small clubs throughout the country, and recorded our first album. We also had a single on the charts, Dylan’s ‘She Belongs To Me’. That was very encouraging. I guess that’s the only thing I miss about those days – to have a single released, and to hear it two days later on all the stations. Yeah, I guess I’d like that again.”

The above was part of a feature by Shaun Considine in the New York Times of Jan. 23, 1972, and it seems to encapsulate nicely a little of this period’s history. The first thing was that single Rick mentioned, ‘She Belongs to Me’/'Promises’, and so far this particular session is not immortalised on an album, although both the songs are differently recorded on the first album we’ll be talking about. ‘She Belongs to Me’ was a million seller, although in all honesty I’m not sure why. It’s not that it’s bad, but it just seems a little ordinary vocally. Mind you, the instrumental side of things is fine, and equally ‘Promises’, which is one of Rick’s own songs, has good playing. Unfortunately, there’s a rather predominant chorus of backing vocalists on the top side. But we’re digressing, and we will a little more with Rick using ‘She Belongs to Me’ to illustrate a point.

“When I first went with MCA, it was Decca, and there was like a new regime every four months. It was really frightening when I went there. But with ‘She Belongs to Me’, I went in and recorded that without them knowing, because I got pre-empted out of the studios over there. I said, ‘Well, this isn’t a hobby to me, you know, this is what I do for a living,’ so I just went in a recorded it, and they all got mad because I said, ‘Just put it out,’ you know, ‘Here’s the single, just put if out.’ It’s just a complete new company now, and it used to be that I was embarrassed to say I was with Decca. But now, if I went to sign with a record company, I’d want to sign with MCA.” 

ZZ: We saw a Stone Canyon – it’s the other end of Sunset, isn’t it?
RN: Well, it’s right down here, it’s off Ventura. I was trying to think of a name…
ZZ: It’s a good name – it’s very Californian!
RN: Yeah, got ‘Canyon’ in there…

Now, all the above is one version of how the Stone Canyon came to be formed. Now a slightly different version, from my first interview with Rick:

“The way it came about was that I was supposed to do a date at the Troubadour in LA, and I was really looking around for a band. I got to know Randy Meisner through going down to the Troubadour and seeing him play with Poco there, and we struck up a casual acquaintance. Then I heard he was looking round to do something else – he had just left Poco, I don’t know really why – he wasn’t very happy with them for some reason. He was living with a drummer, Pat Shanagan, and Allen Kemp, a lead guitarist. He knew Pat and Allen because they had all played together in a group called, at various times, The Poor and the Soul Survivors, up in Denver, Colorado. They had a couple of hit records in Denver as The Poor, but I don’t know which label there were on. Anyway, it happened that they were all available to play at that time, and it worked out real well.

“Then I wanted to use a steel player. On the first date at the Troubadour, Tom Brumley wasn’t with us, and I used Sneaky Pete Kleinow. At that time, he was still with the Burrito Brothers, and he could only do that one date, so I used Buddy Emmons for a couple of nights. I’d never tried a steel guitarist before that date, and I only had three or four days to rehearse using one although I had a feeling it would be OK, because many of my early songs had been country influenced. But Tom is great, I was really lucky to get him. After we’d played that first date, I was going to record a live album, so it was actually our second date there and by that time, I’d got together with Tom, who really hadn’t been playing for about a year, because he was manufacturing steel guitars.”

There will be more on the subject of Mr Brumley a little later in this piece, but at the moment I can’t find the particular article from which I want to quote. Concerning the rest of the original members of the Stone Canyon Band, you can find out more about them, and especially about Randy Meisner, from ZZ24 (Poco article and tree) and ZZ29 (Eagles article and tree). 

In Concert 

And that’s the title of the first album from this latest outburst. You’ll have gathered from what has gone before, and from the title of the album that it’s live, and a highly biased source, the by now famous Rocky Prior, tells me that Rolling Stone described the album as the best live one in several years. In fact, I’m not about to disagree with that, because it’s certainly no strain to play it frequently. It was done at the Troubadour in LA, just like the man said, and Rick had a few words to say about that establishment.

“What I started doing is playing the Palomino, and for one thing, you get paid. At the Troubadour, it ends up costing you to play there. They pay the minimum to everybody, and it’s used as a kind of a springboard for people. It works with a lot of people, but I ended up – I did it three or four times and it becomes as if you’re kind of expected: ‘Well, when are you gonna play the Troubadour again?’ So it’s nothing new.”

Pete [Frame] and I went to the Troubadour a couple of times, and it was pretty nice. the tequilas flowed freely, and the place wasn’t so crowded that it was difficult. We saw Loudon Wainwright, Bonnie Raitt, Wendy Waldman and somebody else – quite an impressive bunch, really, particularly when you consider that the Roxy and the Whisky are very close at hand. London, in that way, you don’t make it. Someone said to me in Hollywood that the Troubadour was only able to remain open because of the booking policy and the occasional live album which was made there, but I really don’t know the truth of that. Anyway, it makes the Speakeasy look like a dungheap.

Ah yes, the record. An announcement, some applause, and straight into a ‘hello’ song, ‘Come on In’, written by Rick. Straightaway, the instrumental power of the band is demonstrated, with some dinky little solos from Brumley and Kemp, and some really tasty harmonies. Rick sings at the bottom, Kemp a step up, and Meisner positively excels at the top. A good track, and immediately into ‘Hello, Mary Lou’, which inevitably has a somewhat different treatment, but no less good for that. Brumley’s fills are beautiful, and Kemp, whose guitar playing I found rather suspect when I saw the band on their British tour, holds his own.

Rick introduces ‘Violets of Dawn’ as being by ‘a good friend’, Eric Andersen. Nevertheless, Eric’s surname suffers the usual mis-spelling on his songwriter credit, even though he writes the appreciative sleeve note inside, and makes it clear that it’s an ‘e’ and not an ‘o’ at the end of his name. (Just to make up for that, let me plug a double album in Vanguard’s fine Best Of/Greatest Hits series. The Best of Eric Andersen, which contains the original of this excellent song.) A kind of medley, composed of ‘Who Cares About tomorrow’ and ‘Promises’ (the B side of ‘She Belongs to Me’, but in studio form on the single) follows, then ‘She Belongs to Me’ again, but with rather superior harmonizes and so on, when compared to the studio cut. Up to this point it’s all very fine stuff, and only the choice of ‘If You Gotta Go, Go Now’ mars this side of the album. It’s a bit too much of hackneyed number for my money, and Brumley plays what becomes a rather irritating lick during the verses. Still, a very good start. (Before I forget, the mention of a sleevenote by Eric Andersen may have confused a few of you, who are even now searching their copies of the album. Unfortunately, you’ve been the helpless victims of British cheapo-cheapo, and you should think about replacing your copy with an American cut out, which is how I know about the fold-out sleeve.)

Side two starts off with a gentle percussion beat, then Rick goes into ‘I’m Walkin” to a scream of delight from the audience, which you will find becomes fully justified by the time you get into the track, which is quite beautiful. Then there’s a hark-back to that Tim Hardin-influenced album, and we get ‘Red Balloon’, which works better in this band contact than in the highly orchestrated versions of Tim’s other songs by Rick. When you’re this far through the album, and you’re digging it like I am, it doesn’t matter that the next track is ‘Louisiana Man’, and certainly he version of ‘Believe What You Say’ is great, with a driving beat and those reliable Brumley fills. In fact, by this time one is beginning to get the picture that Tom Brumley is the James Burton of the Stone Canyon Band, if you see what I mean.

The audience, presumably composed of the very young, didn’t seem to recognise ‘Believe What You Say’, and greeted its announcement without a murmur, as also occurred with ‘Easy to Be Free’, which is another of Rick’s own songs, but after both well-deserved outbursts of cheering could be detected. Not surprising, because ‘Easy To Be Free’ is a fabulous song and stands up with all the other ace songs on the record, including the one which ends it all, ‘I Shall Be Released’. All in all, a very fine album indeed, and one which you, yes, I mean you, should have. A compete recommendation, for despite the one or two points I’ve mentioned, this is a better album in every way (recording, playing, singing, production, material), than almost anything that I’ve heard in 1974. Now, follow that…. 

Rick Sings Nelson 

And he did, too. In September of the same year, 1970, whose January had produced In Concert came Rick Sings Nelson and if you thought my comments on the sleeve of In Concert were a little scathing, just wait because this later album’s sleeve is absolutely crucified in comparison to the American original. The cover concept was brilliant – externally, a plain buff sleeve, with, in the centre of the front, a label sized hole, just like a 78 sleeve, really. Through this circle could be seen the record label, which is a specially designed effort, multi-coloured, but not in a psychedelic way, more like a cowboy leather belt or bad design. A picture or Rick at the top, the album’s title, a few credits including the song titles, and right at the bottom, very small, the American Decca logo. Inside, there’s a loose poster of Rick in a monochrome brown, which nearly smells of horses and is big too, nearly three feet by two. When you open the sleeve, you find that the poster is a blown up details of a picture of the band, idling in some Texan ghost town, and really looking ready for some kind of action, like maybe the posse, or is it the bad guys, come galloping into town. It’s a little like something from A Fistful of Dollars, and that’s high praise indeed from me.

So what did the English company do? Well, it’s a bit predictable, isn’t it? First off, the poster goes, and I suppose that’s not too unreasonable. Then the fold-out sleeve goes, for which I suppose there might be an excuse, but when they decide that the hole in the middle is going to cost too much, everything starts falling apart, So it’s no hole, and may be that wouldn’t have been too bad, if they hadn’t made the most appallingly poor copy of the beautiful label, and slapped it on the front of the sleeve! It looks positively horrendous. Now we all know that disasters happen from time to time, but this one would win gold vases, and nearly equal the Titanic. In fact, since MCA have moved from Decca to EMI, I think they may have altered the sleeve a bit – to its original splendour, of course, but to something which resembles the end of the world a little less. On the MCA advertisement in ZZ45, which accompanies the first part of this Charlton Heston work, the sleeve looks rather better than when I saw it previously. If so, well done. If not, change it, before it begins its Gorgon act of turning people to stone.

Anyway, enough of the sleeve, and on to the contents. Reasonably enough, after that title, all the songs are Rick’s own compositions. A quote from one of his biographies:

“Not too long ago, Rick made an important discovery for himself: songwriting. ‘I had been sort of lost and unhappy, but you either have to quit completely, or get hold of yourself and make a total commitment. That’s when I decided to get into writing. I wrote songs back in the ’50s as well, but never really pushed it. It’s a very personal thing, and takes a lot of courage to perform and record your own songs, because you’re always wide open to any criticism. You just have to forget that aspect of it, and go out and do it.”

Since the previous album, the fist of the personnel changes had occurred. In the Stone Canyon Band, it was always the bass players who caused the trouble in the early days. “Randy left, and Tim Cetera joined. He’s the brother of Pete Cetera, who’s in Chicago. Tim is a really talented guy, a good bass player, but the thing I wanted to have going was vocal harmonies – Allen’s voice is the next step up from mine, and he does a lot of harmony parts, and Randy had a kind of folky high voice – and it had worked out very well, but although Tim had no problems as a bass player, it was too high for him to make it vocally. He left to form a group of his own, had he’s also doing session work.” (Oh yes, and a final word about the English sleeve before I forget – the style of writing on the American sleeve had to be looked at fairly carefully before it was transposed to it inferior British counterpart, and poor old Cetera changed his name from Tim to Jim according to the UK sleeve.)

Oh, yes, silly me – the record. Well, with the exception of one track, in fact the last track, this seems to me to be one of the great country/rock albums, in the same league as the first Eagles LP, or A Good Feelin’ to Know – you know the sort of thing. It’s difficult to be critical at all, apart from that one track, because it’s a very even, well thought out, and essentially melodic record of very high quality songs, performed with a feeling and love which comes as a surprise after much of the stuff we hear today. Oh shut up – you’ll never lose that ‘Died in 1967′ epithet if you carry on like that – sorry, squire, I sold the record. But seriously, let’s get down to that nasty track. It’s called ‘My Woman’, and it starts off with tasty chunky guitar chords, and all’s very well until the intrusion of a Dixieland band, and not a tasteful one at that – more like the kind of stuff that such as Sid Phillips might have played, although that’s not supposed to be a personal slur. It’s just that he comes to mind as typifying Light programme ‘Music While You Work’ trad. Anyway, this bunch take over, particularly the trombonist, who apparently had brought his tailgate with him, and it’s only the entry on to the scene of a ferocious hound, who’s upset by the noise, and determines to make his own barking type noise, that drives the loony traddies away. Good for the dog, I say. That’s that out of the way, and now to pick out a few highlights. The day I’m writing this, or rather the night, is that of October 28th, and on this night last year, I was trying to get to sleep, knowing that on October 29th I’d be in California.

Am I missing that now! So I’m bound to like a song which starts off, “I’m going to California, and I’ll be there in a week” and goes on about living in a canyon. In fact ‘California’ is the title of the song, and maybe it’s not quite as good a song as it looks. I mean, the place is like being on another planet. If you’ve never been, then start saving right now. California is paradise, but paradise lost, and a visit, if not emigration, is just essential.

The rest or the songs are just fine, and I like them all, with special reference to ‘How Long’, which is a little melancholy, but still great. In general, the business about Cetera not having the right choice can be appreciated, and in fact at times it sounds like they’ve employed some lady back-up singers. Brumley is, at worst, neat and tasteful, and at best, as on ‘The Dolphin’, positively brilliant. There’s also a percussion instrument on that track, perhaps maracas, which sounds enormously like a dog scratching microbes from beneath its armpit. Most effective. Also Rick himself plays piano on ‘The Reason Why’, doing very well, and if it’s him doing that “hit them 88″s electric piano solo on the same track, he’s really got the instrument under control. Anyway, enough of this trivia – this is a record you should have, just like the last one, and I suppose that this was the album that finally, once and for all, proved that Rick was his own man, and not an ageing ’50s rocker still trying to earn a living on the strength of a bunch of golden oldies. Buy this one – OK? 

Rudy the Fifth 

Why not Rick the Twenty Seventh? Well, it’s not so catchy, is it? In fact, this seems to be the twenty-seventh album by Rick Nelson, which is some achievement. Wait until David Bowie or Brian Ferry etc… Rudy the Fifth, whatever it may mean, is an album that continually makes me think of other great albums I’m very fond of. In fact, it’s also the record that justifies the length of this piece.

There’s nothing bad here at all – perhaps the odd track which verges on the ordinary, like ‘Love Minus Zero (No Limit)’, which is an irreproachable song, of course, but is here sung in rather a routine manner. But we’re moving too fast again, because the record starts off the way it means to continue with Tom Brumley doing a very lifelike take-off of a train getting up steam. The track is titled ‘This Train’, and although it may sound a little hackneyed, it all works a treat. A bit of phased drumming some great bass playing from Randy Meisner, who had by now returned to the group, and even some good piano. Next comes ‘Just Like a Woman’, with some more exemplary steel playing from Tom Brumley, and here we have a good version. I imagine that some might consider it unnecessary, but I believe that it’s only as unnecessary as anyone doing a first-class song – even Bowie and Ferry etc, etc.

‘Sing Me a Song’, like ‘This Train’ is one of Rick’s own songs, and it’s a little reminiscent of ‘You Ain’t Goin’ Nowhere’, which is a good excuse to mention the very wonderful Starry Eyed and Laughing, who play a pretty neat version of the song themselves. On ‘Sing Me a Song’, there’s a good example of the way Brumley has taken over the lead playing – Kemp does a few notes, then the steel guitar picks it up and plays a glorious solo. Very much the same happens on the next track, ‘The Last Time Around’, where Brumley’s solo is positively ludicrous. When the track starts, you just know what you’re going to hear a good song, and you sure do. It’s a little like some of the things on Terry Melcher’s album, which I rate very highly indeed. Also the orchestration is well done, as usual by Jimmie Haskell, and that seems a good cue for a quote from Rick on the subject of arrangements.

“In those early days, arrangements weren’t formalised. They just slipped into place, because we rehearsed a lot. Just like the band I have now – we were always playing together, and that’s the best atmosphere in which arrangements can evolve. We recorded by just sitting around and playing until something came out that we liked. There’s a certain amount of freedom in that approach, and it gives everyone the chance to try different things. However, Jimmie Haskell has done all the other arrangements, on and off, right from the start up to Rudy the Fifth. He writes beautiful string scores, and he’s really good.’ Next comes the first of two tracks which are in fact the same song, ‘Song for Kristin’. The lady is Rick’s Mrs, of course, and the tributes to her are instrumental. On the first side, there’s a classical guitar-based piece. It’s nice, if a little out of context with the rest of the record – however, it’s the correct length, which is short. The version on the other side is guitar, but with a string section, and is probably marginally preferable.

The end of the first side is ‘Honky Tonk Women’, which has some more good bass playing, as well as fine drumming from Shanahan, and some quite outstanding steel licks (again). The song is played in a rather more staccato fashion than in its original by the Strolling Ones (thank you, Benny Hill). Altogether, an excellent side, and there’s no letup on side two, which starts with another remake, this time of Johnny ‘Running Bear’ Preston’s ‘Feel So Fine’, and again with piano either by Rick or by Andy Belling, of whom I know nothing else. The song fades into a joke ending, hardly the right herald for one of Rick’s most excellent songwriting and vocal performances, ‘Life’. The only word for this song is one of the many panegyrics I’ve used before (thanx, Al Clark), and with the syncopated backing, the sympathetic orchestration and the cymbal snaps coming from the right hand speaker (left, if mine are wrongly wired again), this is a goodie indeed. ‘Thank You Lord’ is a pseudo-religious song, which starts slowly, then develops into a Southern gospel type rave-up. I wrote in my notes that again it reminded me of Terry Melcher, although I’m not altogether sure why as I sit here tripping. We’ve already dealt with the second version of ‘Song for Kristin’ and ‘Love Minus Zero’, so it’s up to the final track, ‘Gypsy Pilot’, which is a raver of the ‘Fortune Teller’ persuasion, both lyrically and musically, and having been written by Rick, is fairly autobiographical to boot. It’s fairly good, too, but after ‘Life’, it doesn’t have a chance, even with its Hawkwind type ending.

There’s one little coda to Rudy the Fifth, in the form of a single, which was released here on April 16th, 1971, of ‘Life’ – a different version without the strings you hear on the album version, and ‘California’, which is from the album. I’d be interested to hear from anyone who doesn’t require their copy, or has a duplicate – the number is MCA MU1135 Ta. 

Garden Party 

Ah, you know a little bit about this one don’t you? Let’s do

a bit of quoting before we get on to the record. First from a biography: “Not to forget the new album’s namesake ‘Garden Party’, which was the result of his not-so-welcome reception at a Madison Square Garden rock revival concert. The song says goodbye to the people who booed him there, those who wanted to hear the songs of an era long gone. ‘I never believe in rock and roll revivals,’ says Rick. ‘They’re people trying to recapture something that can’t be brought back, but I talked myself into it by thinking that performing for such a large audience was definitely worthwhile. I didn’t know anything about these shows or what people expected. They kept looking at me and my long hair as if they couldn’t believe I was the same person. The evening was a depressing one, but in a way it was good – for it renewed my belief in myself and what I should be doing.” From the first interview, before the song had been heard – “I was talked into doing the Richard Nader thing, but playing at Madison Square Garden was the clincher. I didn’t want it to be called a rock ‘n’ roll revival show, but it was. People were there just to see artists coming out of like closets or something from the ’50s, do their thing, and then go back. We had to re-learn all the old songs, but when I walked on the stage, I don’t think they recognised me without the braces on my teeth.”

From another biography – “Scattered throughout the crowd at Madison Square Garden, there are always few easily detectable cases of premature senility. At Volume VII in October 1971, the symptoms were most in evidence. Special guest star billing on that occasion went to Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band. Now granted, Rick Nelson no more belongs at a Rock Revival than Paul McCartney. One tends to forget that Rick has matured into one of Country Rock’s most accomplished performers, equal certainly to Poco and the Burritos, and perhaps better than the currently popular Eagles. Listen to how much better Rick’s original of ‘Hello Mary Lou’ is compared to the recent revivals by Creedence and the New Riders. There seems to be, however, some lingering prejudice against Rick because of his teen idol days. Perhaps that’s why his latest work remains obscure, except to an enlightened few. Did anyone bother to report that George Harrison was on his way to see Rick perform in England recently, when he and Patti had their car accident? Anyway, Rick came on that night and reminded a few people that it was the 1970s and they didn’t like him for it. He offered the most impressive set of the entire evening, and they booed him. They couldn’t cope with it. Rick didn’t play the game. He didn’t pretend that Madison Square Garden was the biggest malt shop in the world, and that he was a jukebox that hadn’t been tampered with since 1961.”

Heavy stuff, squire? By this time, another bass player change had occurred, Randy Meisner having finally left for the Eyrie, and been replaced by Steve Love. This seems a good time to back track a little on the various members of the Stone Canyon Band up to this point. I won’t bother with Meisner, because his story seems to be well-documented, and I don’t know anything other than what has already been said on the subject of Tim Cetera. Pat Shanahan, apart from being in The Poor and so on, seems to have been one of the Curt Boettcher/Gary Usher people because he appears on the legendary Millennium album, and also on a Together Records double obscurity called Birth Announcement by one Danny Cox. If anyone knows anything, please let me know. Allen Kemp is shrouded in obscurity – the only other credit I have for him is as part of the live backing band for a rather obscure bunch known as Dalton and Dubarri, who Pete and I saw on our second night in LA. If any of you are really into obscuresville, would it be of interest to know that Dalton and Dubarri is a reincarnation of another never-heard-of-them group called Boone’s Farm? Thought not.

Then we come on to Tom Brumley. (My friend Tony Byworth, who is so knowledgeable as to make me feel an imbecile on the subject of country rock –shut up at the back there! – has photocopied for this article the May 1972 issue of Country Music People, which deals at some length with the steel guitar and the players thereof. So thank, Tony, and thanks C.M.P. for the information which follows.) The first thing which strikes me as interesting is that Tom’s father, Albert E. Brumley, wrote ‘I’ll Fly Away’ and ‘Turn Your Radio On’. Did you know that? Apparently, Tom and Albert are going to make an album of the latter’s songs, including those two, so look out for it. Tom’s main claim to fame before joining Rick Nelson was that he was with Buck Owens and the Buckaroos from December ‘63 until February 1969, at which point he became fed up with the constant traveling (Buck Owens is huge in the States). Tom then became manager of a company which built steel guitars, called ZeeBee. The name comes from one Zane Beck who started the company, and Tom stayed with them, not playing at all, for a year, before joining the Stone Canyon Band. He has also played on sessions with the Hagers (now on Asylum), Susan Raye, the Bakersfield Brass and Rose Maddox, about most of whom I know nothing, and is also doing a steel album, which should be complete by now, with Gene Moles, about whom etc.

Rick talked a little about his faithful steel player. “He told me that he really did want to play – he’d been on the road with Buck Owens for so long that it was driving him crazy. He’s still involved with ZeeBee guitars, and I think he owns part of the company, still kind of oversees it a little. Tom’s really good – it’s a really versatile instrument, but people are so quick to just put it in one category, because that’s all they’ve ever heard as the way it’s been played. You can get al sorts of sounds out of it, and you can do it without making it a mechanical type sound too, without making it sound like it’s coming through a Leslie speaker or something. I’ve never really believed in that, you know – a steel guitar should sound like a steel guitar, and to an organ. Anyway, Tom’s a really super person, and we get along real well, and think the same way about a lot of things.”

Does he ever write songs? “Yeah, as a matter of fact he wrote a song that was a big instrumental hit for Buck Owens, but I can’t remember the name of it. It’s hard for someone who thinks instrumentally to write, I imagine, because he’s never really thought about writing words. That’s why it’s much easier for someone who plays the guitar, because you’re always sitting thinking in terms of vocals and music at the same time. But he has a lot of good instrumental ideas.”

All I can say is that Tom Brumley’s playing on the Stone Canyon Band albums is practically faultless. OK? And now on to Steve Love. Of course you all know that he was the bass player in Roger McGuinn’s band that came over this summer and delighted Hyde Park, but before that and before the Stone Canyon Band, I had thought that he was in the excellent and much under-rated New York band, Stories, a band which also featured the talents of Michael Brown, an ordinary name, but an extraordinary talent when you figure that he wrote ‘Walk Away Renee’ and ‘Pretty Ballerina’, and was leader of the legendary and fabulous Left Banke. Rick didn’t think that Steve was in Stories, but I’ve found a picture of them, and the guy with the moustache in the front there looks pretty much like the same Steve Love, but on a cold and windy day. Anyone with any more definite information, please let me know, and you should check out the Left Banke (on Philips) and Stories (on Kama Sutra).

Now the record. I thought it might be a nice idea to ring up the mysterious Rocky Prior, and ask him which tracks were his favourites on these last two albums, and I’ve incorporated his comments with mine. ‘Let It Bring You Along’ was written by Steve Love, and there doesn’t seem to be any Tom Brumley in evidence, unless the dual-lead guitar thing at the end has a steel as one of its parts. The song is average but hots up a lot when the guitar solo comes in. It’s as if someone shoved a red-hot poker up A. Kemp. Then there’s the title track, which should have been a hit single here, but just failed to make the top thirty, despite almost ceaseless radio play for several weeks. The song should be well known to all, but I’d like to point out the very direct mention of Chuck Berry, looking and playing just about the same as he did fifteen years before. Is this progress, I ask myself?

Much of the rest of the album consists of good but undistinguished songs, with the instrumental side of things making more waves than the singing, which isn’t bad, but doesn’t have a lot to work with. ‘So Long Mama’, for instance, has some good steel, as usual, ‘I Wanna Be With You’, written by Kemp and the now-departed Meisner, is all right, but no more and ‘Are You Really Real?’ has wood flute, whatever that is, played by Don Nelson, who may be a relation, but then again, may not. Rocky noted that Rick uses what he called ‘John Lennon echo’ on his voice, and that’s right. Very odd. Side two begins with ‘I’m Talkin’ About You’ from that very same C. Berry and you’ll recall that the same song, but in a different version, was on Spotlight on Rick, which we discussed in the last issue. This time, it’s a long song, and it’s played rather like The Who might do it, which I’m sure you’ll agree can’t be bad. Oh, but the drumming’s not too much like that nice Mr Moon. In fact, it’s a rather impressive track, and the next one, ‘Nighttime Lady’, a Nelson composition, ends up somewhat the same way, although it’s a bit ordinary for a start. After that ‘A Flower Opens Gently By’ and ‘Don’t Let Your Goodbye Stand’, which are both enormously unwieldy and unlikely titles, don’t really get one leaping about, and ‘Palace Guard’, the follow-up single to ‘Garden Party’, makes it as an album track, but is about as commercial as Michael Nesmith, if you see what I mean. And ‘Don’t Let Your Goodbye Stand’ was written by Richard Stekol, who rocky thinks is an obscure American poet. Rocky also feels that this album, coming as it did off a big single, at least in the States, was rather an anti-climax, and I think he’s very probably right there. Back to Rick, talking about the gap between the ‘Garden Party’ single and the album which eventually emerged.

“It really was a long time – I got caught in a trap almost, because ‘Garden Party’ really took off before I expected it to. When the album did come out, it was like an old album, because it was so long after the single (album released late 1972). And then the old group decided to leave. They had been talking about it, and they wanted to form their own group, all except Tom. Tom was very happy with what we were playing. I’ve always let them do what they want to do, and it was mutual agreement kind of thing, no hard feelings or anything. It happened just before the album came out, and it could have been very difficult to promote the album, but I got together the new band in about three days. It was incredible! Just super musicians, and signers – that was my main worry, that I’d fail to vocally be able to match was was going on.

“What happened with the old group, was that they started a group, and they split up within a matter of weeks. I can’t blame them for wanting to start one, but it’s a difficult thing to keep everybody together and happy. I guess they were feeling neglected. They reached a point where they couldn’t really go any farther, and they weren’t that happy with what we were playing. It was actually a thing that I could feel was happening, and I was about at the stage of expecting a split. But things always work out for the better, and I’m much happier musically, and everyone’s really into what we’re playing. The old group went as far as we could go, and all of a sudden that was it. The only thing that worried me was that they left when they knew there were some gigs, coming up in ten days, but they put it to me on the basis that they would try to work around their dates if I couldn’t find anybody… so I just found somebody.” 

Windfall 

And now we’re as up to date as we’re going to get. Windfall was released in the States in late 1973, and here about last April or May. It features an almost totally new Stone Canyon Band, Tom Brumley being the only one, apart form Rick himself, to stay. So the first thing to talk about is the band. Rick: “I just really lucked out this time. It started with Dennis Larden, the guitar player, who is really inventive and really a good songwriter. The bass player is Jay White (J. DeWitt White) and Ty Grimes is the drummer. They’re not from anywhere specific, but they knew each other and had played together before, on club dates and stuff. What usually happens is that you meet one guy, and he’ll know a couple of other people that are friends of his, that he’s played with. So that’s what happened. We were playing a date at the Houston Astrodome. It’s kinda frightening anyway, just to drive by there. It’s so huge… I mean, everybody’ll say, ‘Oh, that’s really big,’ but you can’t believe it – you’re like a little speck. So that was the next date, and we just had to get it together. We had a week and a half between that and trying to get the band together, so it was kind of thrown together, but everybody really came through.

“I met Dennis through a fellow named Michael Sherman, who is now a freelance writer, although he was working at MCA at the time. He’d heard Dennis playing a couple of sessions. So Dennis and I got together, and then we talked about these other people. Tom Brumley, though is a very important part of the whole thing. If Tom had left, I would have really been in trouble. What’s happened now is that these guys are musically so good, and Tom helps Dennis a lot, and Dennis helps Tom a lot, and it’s really a good working thing. Tom was very country-oriented, and on this new album, we’ve kind of taken it a step further, because the steel is so versatile that it doesn’t have to be relegated to country. I’m really happy with it, and it’s really helped Tom’s playing a lot, listening to Dennis. They worked out a lot of things together. And what’s really great is that everybody’s working for the same thing now. It’s not a question of one guy wants to do this, the other wants to do that – they’re really happy playing what we’re playing.”

The gripe about this album is that in its American version, the words were on the back of the sleeve in the lovely Mrs Nelson’s tasty writing. For no good reason that I’m aware of, we didn’t get them here, but otherwise, the sleeve is pretty nice. And the record – well, it sure isn’t another Rudy the Fifth, unfortunately, but it’s quite acceptable. The band seem more together than their predecessors, said Rocky, and it does show through. What we have here is patchy material, but very well played. Dennis Larden, as well as being a good guitarist, is also a songwriter, and while it would be wrong to call him a great writer at this point, he did in fact write five and a half songs of the ten on the album, including the best two, or even three, which are ‘Legacy’ ‘Don’t Leave Me Here’ and ‘One Night Stand’. Is he taking over from you in the songwriting field, Rick? “He wrote the majority, but for me it wasn’t a question of taking over. I think in the long run it’s going to be an addition, and it has relieved me of the pressure of having to come up with ten songs, which I like, and it leads to more variety, which is a good thing.”

‘Legacy’ is actually brilliant. Rocky reckons it’s one of the very best songs Nelson has ever recorded, feeling that this kind of easy-going, chug along song is what Rick does best, a sentiment with which I totally agree. Notice also the lovely falling passage played on the steel guitar. Indeed a goodie. ‘Someone to Love’ demonstrates that Rick isn’t quite so good on a boogie, and the whole track, complete with fuzz guitar and fuzz steel is a bit over-heavy. ‘How Many Times’ is Jay White’s song, and in all honesty, it gets a bit tedious by the end. ‘Evil Woman Child’ is one where Tom Brumley plays lead, although it sounds like a regular guitar. It’s a Latinish track, which Rick felt was something like ‘Hello Mary Lou’, but unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to be in the same league to me. Much better is the majestic beauty of ‘Don’t Leave Me Here’, and when you turn the record over, ‘Wild Nights in Tulsa’ is also good. A travel song, written by Don Burns and Ricky Wildflower, which might have been off those famed country albums.

The single from this album was ‘Lifestream’, which Rocky feels was a mistake. It’s not bad, very pleasant, typical mainstream country rock, and other epithets of that nature, but it really isn’t a single, and the only reason it became a single was because it was one of the first of the tracks to be completed. ‘One Night Stand’ is again very good, and again could have been on the country albums, but ‘I Don’t Want to Be Lonely Tonight’, which is Baker Knight’s return to writing for Rick, is unfortunately not really up to his best. Finally, the title track, ‘Windfall’, isn’t that hot either. It’s a track with all sorts of percussion instruments, which sounds as though it could have come off that previously mentioned Millennium album, where there’s a very similar track called ‘The Island’. And all that adds up to a somewhat unsatisfactory, but nevertheless reasonable album. 

Bits 

Just before we wind this all up, a few more things that came out of the interviews. Let’s start with acting. Rick has made appearances in The Streets of San Francisco, as a murderer, in Marshall as a rapist, in McCloud as a murderer/rock ‘n’ roll signer (they also played ‘Garden Party’ in that one, which may have assisted in the song’s success), and he wants to do some more acting, although he’s not actively searching for it. On ‘Hello Mary Lou’: – “It’s good not to feel that I necessarily have to play that to walk out of the building.” On the changes since he started out: ‘What’s happened is that there are so many better musicians now. When I started, there were four or five lead guitar players that you could name that were contributing anything, and now there’s just so many really great musicians. It’s very easy to end up on the outside of that, rather then really dive into it. Because that’s who the competition is – I’m in competition with everybody. To get to the point of it, I have to at least come up to that standard of playing, and I can’t afford to fall back on the old songs if I want to progress.” 

End 

All right, that’s it, I’ve finished. Just before I go, thanks to the following:

Peter Robinson and Geoff Thorn of MCA in England. Bill Yaryan of MCA in Los Angeles, or wherever he is now. Sandy Friedman of Rogers, Cowan and Brenner, in Beverly Hills. Rocky Prior or lending me his records, giving me his opinions, and badgering me into doing the interviews. Willie Nelson (Rick’s cousin and manager). Ray McCarthy for the loan of his records. And of course, to Rick Nelson. 

P.S. Latest news is that Ty Grimes left the Stone Canyon Band to join the Captain in the Magic Band, and was replaced by Richie Hayward when it was thought that Little Feat were on the way out. Now that Lowell and the boys are getting to be stars, Rick probably doesn’t have him any more. Additionally, there hasn’t been anything else released since Windfall. It would be nice to think that this article might at least indicate that someone somewhere cares. 

John Tobler

Permalink 6 Comments

Kenneth Rexroth – Thou Shalt Not Kill” (1953)

August 25, 2009 at 10:41 am (Kenneth Rexroth, Poetry & Literature)

A Memorial for Dylan Thomas 

       I

They are murdering all the young men.
For half a century now, every day,
They have hunted them down and killed them.
They are killing them now.
At this minute, all over the world,
They are killing the young men.
They know ten thousand ways to kill them.
Every year they invent new ones.
In the jungles of Africa,
In the marshes of Asia,
In the deserts of Asia,
In the slave pens of Siberia,
In the slums of Europe,
In the nightclubs of America,
The murderers are at work.

They are stoning Stephen,
They are casting him forth from every city in the world.
Under the Welcome sign,
Under the Rotary emblem,
On the highway in the suburbs,
His body lies under the hurling stones.
He was full of faith and power.
He did great wonders among the people.
They could not stand against his wisdom.
They could not bear the spirit with which he spoke.
He cried out in the name
Of the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness.
They were cut to the heart.
They gnashed against him with their teeth.
They cried out with a loud voice.
They stopped their ears.
They ran on him with one accord.
They cast him out of the city and stoned him.
The witnesses laid down their clothes
At the feet of a man whose name was your name —
You.

You are the murderer.
You are killing the young men.
You are broiling Lawrence on his gridiron.
When you demanded he divulge
The hidden treasures of the spirit,
He showed you the poor.
You set your heart against him.
You seized him and bound him with rage.
You roasted him on a slow fire.
His fat dripped and spurted in the flame.
The smell was sweet to your nose.
He cried out,
“I am cooked on this side,
Turn me over and eat,
You
Eat of my flesh.”

You are murdering the young men.
You are shooting Sebastian with arrows.
He kept the faithful steadfast under persecution.
First you shot him with arrows.
Then you beat him with rods.
Then you threw him in a sewer.
You fear nothing more than courage.
You who turn away your eyes
At the bravery of the young men.

You,
The hyena with polished face and bow tie,
In the office of a billion dollar
Corporation devoted to service;
The vulture dripping with carrion,
Carefully and carelessly robed in imported tweeds,
Lecturing on the Age of Abundance;
The jackal in double-breasted gabardine,
Barking by remote control,
In the United Nations;
The vampire bat seated at the couch head,
Notebook in hand, toying with his decerebrator;
The autonomous, ambulatory cancer,
The Superego in a thousand uniforms;
You, the finger man of behemoth,
The murderer of the young men.

       II

What happened to Robinson,
Who used to stagger down Eighth Street,
Dizzy with solitary gin?
Where is Masters, who crouched in
His law office for ruinous decades?
Where is Leonard who thought he was
A locomotive? And Lindsay,
Wise as a dove, innocent
As a serpent, where is he?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

What became of Jim Oppenheim?
Lola Ridge alone in an
Icy furnished room? Orrick Johns,
Hopping into the surf on his
One leg? Elinor Wylie
Who leaped like Kierkegaard?
Sara Teasdale, where is she?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

Where is George Sterling, that tame fawn?
Phelps Putnam who stole away?
Jack Wheelwright who couldn’t cross the bridge?
Donald Evans with his cane and
Monocle, where is he?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

John Gould Fletcher who could not
Unbreak his powerful heart?
Bodenheim butchered in stinking
Squalor? Edna Millay who took
Her last straight whiskey? Genevieve
Who loved so much; where is she?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

Harry who didn’t care at all?
Hart who went back to the sea?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

Where is Sol Funaroff?
What happened to Potamkin?
Isidor Schneider? Claude McKay?
Countee Cullen? Clarence Weinstock?
Who animates their corpses today?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

Where is Ezra, that noisy man?
Where is Larsson whose poems were prayers?
Where is Charles Snider, that gentle
Bitter boy? Carnevali,
What became of him?
Carol who was so beautiful, where is she?
       Timor mortis conturbat me.

       III

Was their end noble and tragic,
Like the mask of a tyrant?
Like Agamemnon’s secret golden face?
Indeed it was not. Up all night
In the fo’c’sle, bemused and beaten,
Bleeding at the rectum, in his
Pocket a review by the one
Colleague he respected, “If he
Really means what these poems
Pretend to say, he has only
One way out —.” Into the
Hot acrid Caribbean sun,
Into the acrid, transparent,
Smoky sea. Or another, lice in his
Armpits and crotch, garbage littered
On the floor, gray greasy rags on
The bed. “I killed them because they
Were dirty, stinking Communists.
I should get a medal.” Again,
Another, Simenon foretold
His end at a glance. “I dare you
To pull the trigger.” She shut her eyes
And spilled gin over her dress.
The pistol wobbled in his hand.
It took them hours to die.
Another threw herself downstairs,
And broke her back. It took her years.
Two put their heads under water
In the bath and filled their lungs.
Another threw himself under
The traffic of a crowded bridge.
Another, drunk, jumped from a
Balcony and broke her neck.
Another soaked herself in
Gasoline and ran blazing
Into the street and lived on
In custody. One made love
Only once with a beggar woman.
He died years later of syphilis
Of the brain and spine. Fifteen
Years of pain and poverty,
While his mind leaked away.
One tried three times in twenty years
To drown himself. The last time
He succeeded. One turned on the gas
When she had no more food, no more
Money, and only half a lung.
One went up to Harlem, took on
Thirty men, came home and
Cut her throat. One sat up all night
Talking to H.L. Mencken and
Drowned himself in the morning.
How many stopped writing at thirty?
How many went to work for Time?
How many died of prefrontal
Lobotomies in the Communist Party?
How many are lost in the back wards
Of provincial madhouses?
How many on the advice of
Their psychoanalysts, decided
A business career was best after all?
How many are hopeless alcoholics?
René Crevel!
Jacques Rigaud!
Antonin Artaud!
Mayakofsky!
Essenin!
Robert Desnos!
Saint Pol Roux!
Max Jacob!
All over the world
The same disembodied hand
Strikes us down.
Here is a mountain of death.
A hill of heads like the Khans piled up.
The first-born of a century
Slaughtered by Herod.
Three generations of infants
Stuffed down the maw of Moloch.

       IV

He is dead.
The bird of Rhiannon.
He is dead.
In the winter of the heart.
He is Dead.
In the canyons of death,
They found him dumb at last,
In the blizzard of lies.
He never spoke again.
He died.
He is dead.
In their antiseptic hands,
He is dead.
The little spellbinder of Cader Idris.
He is dead.
The sparrow of Cardiff.
He is dead.
The canary of Swansea.
Who killed him?
Who killed the bright-headed bird?
You did, you son of a bitch.
You drowned him in your cocktail brain.
He fell down and died in your synthetic heart.
You killed him,
Oppenheimer the Million-Killer,
You killed him,
Einstein the Gray Eminence.
You killed him,
Havanahavana, with your Nobel Prize.
You killed him, General,
Through the proper channels.
You strangled him, Le Mouton,
With your mains étendues.
He confessed in open court to a pince-nezed skull.
You shot him in the back of the head
As he stumbled in the last cellar.
You killed him,
Benign Lady on the postage stamp.
He was found dead at a Liberal Weekly luncheon.
He was found dead on the cutting room floor.
He was found dead at a Time policy conference.
Henry Luce killed him with a telegram to the Pope.
Mademoiselle strangled him with a padded brassiere.
Old Possum sprinkled him with a tea ball.
After the wolves were done, the vaticides
Crawled off with his bowels to their classrooms and quarterlies.
When the news came over the radio
You personally rose up shouting, “Give us Barabbas!”
In your lonely crowd you swept over him.
Your custom-built brogans and your ballet slippers
Pummeled him to death in the gritty street.
You hit him with an album of Hindemith.
You stabbed him with stainless steel by Isamu Noguchi,
He is dead.
He is Dead.
Like Ignacio the bullfighter,
At four o’clock in the afternoon.
At precisely four o’clock.
I too do not want to hear it.
I too do not want to know it.
I want to run into the street,
Shouting, “Remember Vanzetti!”
I want to pour gasoline down your chimneys.
I want to blow up your galleries.
I want to bum down your editorial offices.
I want to slit the bellies of your frigid women.
I want to sink your sailboats and launches.
I want to strangle your children at their finger paintings.
I want to poison your Afghans and poodles.
He is dead, the little drunken cherub.
He is dead,
The effulgent tub thumper.
He is Dead.
The ever living birds are not singing
To the head of Bran.
The sea birds are still
Over Bardsey of Ten Thousand Saints.
The underground men are not singing
On their way to work.
There is a smell of blood
In the smell of the turf smoke.
They have struck him down,
The son of David ap Gwilym.
They have murdered him,
The Baby of Taliessin.
There he lies dead,
By the Iceberg of the United Nations.
There he lies sandbagged,
At the foot of the Statue of Liberty.
The Gulf Stream smells of blood
As it breaks on the sand of Iona
And the blue rocks of Canarvon.
And all the birds of the deep sea rise up
Over the luxury liners and scream,
“You killed him! You killed him.
In your God damned Brooks Brothers suit,
You son of a bitch.”

Kenneth Rexroth

Permalink Leave a Comment

Mary Elizabeth Williams – “How Phil Spector Invented Teen Lust and Torment” (1998)

August 24, 2009 at 3:18 pm (Music, Reviews & Articles)

This article from the Salon website (under their “Brilliant Careers” series of articles) comes from Nov. 10, 1998, and was of course written before Phil Spector’s murder of actress Lana Clarkson in 2003. Yes, it is hard to think of Spector now as anything but a monster, but despite it all, the man did create dozens of brilliant, timeless hits. He was one of the greatest producers in music history, and though that doesn’t excuse his horrendous behavior and acts, it’s just a simple truth…

 

Love, as anybody who’s ever been in it knows, can make you sick with feeling. But nobody ever expressed the dizzying fever of romance quite the way Phil Spector did.

In the early ’60s, while Berry Gordy was taking the rhythm of youth and giving it Motown’s bright, sophisticated sheen, Spector was grabbing up the same elements and pitching them down a black hole of raw emotion and supersaturated orchestration. What spun out the other end was pop music all right, complete with harmonizing vocals, ardent lyrics and lush instrumentation. But it had a new form – one that replaced the bounce of innocence with the throb of desire.

Spector became a musical artist because he was on fire to express himself, and he became a record producer because he wanted to express himself exactly his way. He first learned about creative control as a teenage member of the 1950s one-hit wonders the Teddy Bears, writing and producing for the band as well as playing in it. The song that put him on the map, a hypnotic lullaby called “To Know Him Is to Love Him,” might have sounded like an ode to teen romance. In fact, the song was inspired by Spector’s father, a man so driven by his own demons that he committed suicide when his son was only 8. The title of the song came from the epitaph on his grave. “To Know Him” set the tone for Spector’s unique brand of hit-making – taking tunes suffused with great tenderness and injecting them with a blast of utter torment.

Though Spector liked being a musician, he loathed having anyone – especially industry suits – tell him what to do. So after the Teddy Bears broke up and he had honed his gifts with a stint at New York’s legendary pop factory, the Brill Building, Spector co-founded his own label, Philles. It was there he began to find his groove. Spector continued to play and write, but quickly discovered his real talent was as a musical architect, putting the elements of song together in new and deeply affecting ways.

By the time he was 21, Spector was a millionaire. Within a mere three years, he had produced more than 20 hit singles and given birth to a style bombastically christened “the Wall of Sound.” The Jewish kid whose first love was jazz, this reedy little dynamo from the Bronx, had created a noise that was very, very big.

The Wall of Sound was a musical mind-slam; it overloaded the auditory nerves with such sweepingly complex arrangements and such a barrage of instruments that it rendered the individual parts of the whole unrecognizable. Spector called his singles “little symphonies for the kids,” but they were closer to opera – full of romantic Sturm und Drang and more than occasional dips into absolute madness. The Wall was the sound of young love distilled into the three-minute opus – beautiful and horrible and sweet and suffocating.

To his towering layers of melody Spector piled on lyrics just a little more insistently than anybody else; he added singers whose voices could careen from radio-ready fluff to an anguished wail on the turn of a note. And during the powder-keg tension of the early civil rights era, he had the chutzpah to be colorblind, creating music that refused to be identified by the races of the artists who performed it. It was for his stars the Righteous Brothers (Bill Medley and Bobby Hatfield) that the term “blue-eyed soul” was coined, as if the idea of white singers making truly soulful music had not been possible before. But if his music wasn’t black or white, neither were the feelings it depicted. Nothing was ever simple in a Phil Spector song.

Because Spector produced as a young man, his music had an authentically vulnerable young sound. It was simultaneously rough and elaborate; it beckoned with a finger snap and thumped like a heartbeat. And it laid bare Spector’s own private and painful bêtes noire – his hyperkinetic, insomniac energy; his doomed love affairs; his family’s legacy of mental illness.

Spector knew the tumult and the masochism of love, how a blow can seem like a caress when you haven’t yet learned the difference between the two. The shocking power of “He Hit Me (It Felt Like a Kiss),” which was banned by some radio stations because of its lyrics, has only increased over time; it’s brutal proof of Spector’s unflinching understanding that not all relationships are chaste, “Walking in the Sand” affairs. His music reflected the intensity of first love and first sex, when one’s newfound capacity for pleasure can be so desperately good it crosses over into torment.

Spector had a gift for expressing that raw emotion from a female as well as male perspective. Two of the primary vehicles for his recording studio passions, the Crystals and Ronettes, were the first girl groups to be frankly carnal and unabashed about stating their needs; their voices howled above tsunamis of melody. The heroines of “Then He Kissed Me,” for example, were so blown away at being “kissed in a way that I’d never been kissed before” that the music could only thunder along in knee-buckling amazement at the erotic sensation. Ronettes’ lead singer Ronnie Bennett – Spector’s lover and later wife – didn’t stop at simply asking to “be my little baby,” she demanded that you “be my baby now” with a gorgeously scary urgency. On the painfully majestic “River Deep-Mountain High,” his ultimate metaphor for the soaring, sinking nature of love, Spector reduced Tina Turner to trembling, practically choking sobs, as she moaned, “Do I love you, my oh my?” And then, to show men also could be passion’s victims, he had the Righteous Brothers throw themselves from the cliffs in such instant pop masterpieces as “You’ve Lost That Lovin’ Feeling” (“You never close your eyes anymore when I kiss your lips/There’s no tenderness like before in your fingertips”).

But one can only feel so much for so long. By 1966, propelled by the commercial failure of “River Deep-Mountain High,” he had begun his disgusted retreat away from the music world and into seclusion. He continued to work sporadically, notably on the Beatles’ final group and early solo projects. It was he who put the final touches on the Let It Be album, and he who gave Lennon’s “Instant Karma” its transcendent edge. The song was one of his last real hits, which may be why it sounds like a supernova, an outburst whose finality only adds to its luster.

The “tycoon of teen” was burned out well before he even hit 30, in 1970. In later years Spector traded his vibrancy for eccentricity. By the time he produced the Ramones’ 1980 End of the Century, he was as famous for being a show business kook as he’d ever been for being a producer. The punk heroes did a cover of “Baby I Love You” that creaked with irony.

Gothic stories of drugs and vicious guard dogs and bodyguards spilled out from his Hollywood mansion. Spector took to wearing a gun on his hip and, for a while, a gigantic cross around his neck. He could waste entire days listening to the same track over and over and over again. Guests at his mansion found themselves subjected to capricious lock-ins; his children and ex-wives would claim Spector abused them. The brilliant, beautiful romantic couldn’t die like a Romeo or waste away like a Keats; he settled instead for a dementia-tinged exile. Today Spector still works now and then, but mostly, the man who built the Wall of Sound has erected around himself a wall of silence. And if there are still intoxicating melodies playing in his head, he’s no longer terribly interested in unleashing them on the world.

Spector was the first producer as star, the first behind-the-scenes recording wizard who was bigger than any of his artists. His 1963 Yuletide compilation, A Christmas Gift to You, is still better known as Phil Spector’s Christmas album, as if the collective talents of its formidable contributors are small potatoes next to the creative firepower of its maestro. He was the man who gave the American Bandstand generation a darker and more sexual edge, the prodigy who inspired everyone from the Beach Boys to the Rolling Stones to Bruce Springsteen. He was the first punk, the visionary who fused the pathos of jazz with the vitality of rock ‘n’ roll. He was and remains the classic 20th century pop-genius madman.

Spector was voted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1989. But with his masterpieces dumped into the uneven pile of Oldies “classics,” it’s easy nowadays to overlook Spector’s contribution. And that’s a shame. Because Spector’s greatest songs can still make you feel again – not in a cloyingly nostalgic way, but in a brazenly real one – what it is to confront the world with a young and pliant soul. And they can remind you that while hearts are broken all the time by pain and loneliness, those in love can be wrecked just as easily by pure, astonishing joy.

Mary Elizabeth Williams

Permalink 5 Comments

President Obama’s Weekly Address (Aug. 22, 2009)

August 23, 2009 at 1:16 am (Life & Politics)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Lauri Adverb – “contemplate” (on Pablo Neruda’s “Ode to a Couple”)

August 22, 2009 at 10:08 am (Lauri Adverb, Poetry & Literature)

we do not promise to each other
forever
but today
I refuse each drink I can taste on the tip of my tongue,
you refuse each insult you can taste on the tip of yr tongue. 
We meet for coffee.
Cafe americano, a latte.
I reach for yr hands across a tiny table. 
We window-shop stores decked holiday fa-la-la,
you sing Bing Crosby, hide behind a crowd you pretend
you try to lose me. 
Our lips ache to express in kisses which kindle
what our mouths are afraid to speak: 
Completate, hombre o mujer
que nada te intimide…
 
Can we?
we dunno. 
our lives stretch, today a series
of todays.

Lauri Adverb

Permalink Leave a Comment

Matt Taibbi – “The Great American Bubble Machine” (2009)

August 21, 2009 at 8:41 am (Life & Politics, Reviews & Articles)

A recent article from July – Rolling Stone magazine (double issue #1082-1083). Pretty incendiary, but not surprising. This is just the way America runs these days…

 

From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression – and they’re about to do it again. 

The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.

By now, most of us know the major players. As George Bush’s last Treasury secretary, former Goldman CEO Henry Paulson was the architect of the bailout, a suspiciously self-serving plan to funnel trillions of Your Dollars to a handful of his old friends on Wall Street. Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton’s former Treasury secretary, spent 26 years at Goldman before becoming chairman of Citigroup — which in turn got a $300 billion taxpayer bailout from Paulson. There’s John Thain, the asshole chief of Merrill Lynch who bought an $87,000 area rug for his office as his company was imploding; a former Goldman banker, Thain enjoyed a multi-billion dollar handout from Paulson, who used billions in taxpayer funds to help Bank of America rescue Thain’s sorry company. And Robert Steel, the former Goldmanite head of Wachovia, scored himself and his fellow executives $225 million in golden parachute payments as his bank was self-destructing. There’s Joshua Bolten, Bush’s chief of staff during the bailout, and Mark Patterson, the current Treasury chief of staff, who was a Goldman lobbyist just a year ago, and Ed Liddy, the former Goldman director whom Paulson put in charge of bailed out insurance giant AIG, which forked over $13 billion to Goldman after Liddy came on board. The heads of the Canadian and Italian national banks are Goldman alums, as is the head of the World Bank, the head of the New York Stock Exchange, the last two heads of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York — which, incidentally, is now in charge of overseeing Goldman — not to mention …

But then, any attempt to construct a narrative around all the former Goldmanites in influential positions quickly becomes an absurd and pointless exercise, like trying to make a list of everything. What you need to know is the big picture: If America is circling the drain, Goldman Sachs has found a way to be that drain — an extremely unfortunate loophole in the system of Western democratic capitalism, which never foresaw that in a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy.

The bank’s unprecedented reach and power have enabled it to turn all of America into a giant pump and dump scam, manipulating whole economic sectors for years at a time, moving the dice game as this or that market collapses, and all the time gorging itself on the unseen costs that are breaking families everywhere — high gas prices, rising consumer credit rates, half-eaten pension funds, mass layoffs, future taxes to pay off bailouts. All that money that you’re losing, it’s going somewhere, and in both a literal and a figurative sense, Goldman Sachs is where it’s going: The bank is a huge, highly sophisticated engine for converting the useful, deployed wealth of society into the least useful, most wasteful and insoluble substance on Earth — pure profit for rich individuals.

They achieve this using the same playbook over and over again. The formula is relatively simple: Goldman positions itself in the middle of a speculative bubble, selling investments they know are crap. Then they hoover up vast sums from the middle and lower floors of society with the aid of a crippled and corrupt state that allows it to rewrite the rules in exchange for the relative pennies the bank throws at political patronage. Finally, when it all goes bust, leaving millions of ordinary citizens broke and starving, they begin the entire process over again, riding in to rescue us all by lending us back our own money at interest, selling themselves as men above greed, just a bunch of really smart guys keeping the wheels greased. They’ve been pulling this same stunt over and over since the 1920s — and now they’re preparing to do it again, creating what may be the biggest and most audacious bubble yet.

If you want to understand how we got into this financial crisis, you have to first understand where all the money went — and in order to understand that, you need to understand what Goldman has already gotten away with. It is a history exactly five bubbles long — including last year’s strange and seemingly inexplicable spike in the price of oil. There were a lot of losers in each of those bubbles, and in the bailout that followed. But Goldman wasn’t one of them. 

Bubble #1: The Great Depression 

Goldman wasn’t always a too-big-to-fail Wall Street behemoth, the ruthless face of kill-or-be-killed capitalism on steroids — just almost always. The bank was actually founded in 1869 by a German immigrant named Marcus Goldman, who built it up with his soninlaw Samuel Sachs. They were pioneers in the use of commercial paper, which is just a fancy way of saying they made money lending out shortterm IOUs to small time vendors in downtown Manhattan.

You can probably guess the basic plotline of Goldman’s first 100 years in business: plucky, immigrant-led investment bank beats the odds, pulls itself up by its bootstraps, makes shitloads of money. In that ancient history there’s really only one episode that bears scrutiny now, in light of more recent events: Goldman’s disastrous foray into the speculative mania of precrash Wall Street in the late 1920s.

This great Hindenburg of financial history has a few features that might sound familiar. Back then, the main financial tool used to bilk investors was called an “investment trust.” Similar to modern mutual funds, the trusts took the cash of investors large and small and (theoretically, at least) invested it in a smorgasbord of Wall Street securities, though the securities and amounts were often kept hidden from the public. So a regular guy could invest $10 or $100 in a trust and feel like he was a big player. Much as in the 1990s, when new vehicles like day trading and etrading attracted reams of new suckers from the sticks who wanted to feel like big shots, investment trusts roped a new generation of regular-guy investors into the speculation game.

Beginning a pattern that would repeat itself over and over again, Goldman got into the investmenttrust game late, then jumped in with both feet and went hogwild. The first effort was the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation; the bank issued a million shares at $100 apiece, bought all those shares with its own money and then sold 90 percent of them to the hungry public at $104. The trading corporation then relentlessly bought shares in itself, bidding the price up further and further. Eventually it dumped part of its holdings and sponsored a new trust, the Shenandoah Corporation, issuing millions more in shares in that fund — which in turn sponsored yet another trust called the Blue Ridge Corporation. In this way, each investment trust served as a front for an endless investment pyramid: Goldman hiding behind Goldman hiding behind Goldman. Of the 7,250,000 initial shares of Blue Ridge, 6,250,000 were actually owned by Shenandoah — which, of course, was in large part owned by Goldman Trading.

The end result (ask yourself if this sounds familiar) was a daisy chain of borrowed money, one exquisitely vulnerable to a decline in performance anywhere along the line. The basic idea isn’t hard to follow. You take a dollar and borrow nine against it; then you take that $10 fund and borrow $90; then you take your $100 fund and, so long as the public is still lending, borrow and invest $900. If the last fund in the line starts to lose value, you no longer have the money to pay back your investors, and everyone gets massacred.

In a chapter from The Great Crash, 1929 titled “In Goldman Sachs We Trust,” the famed economist John Kenneth Galbraith held up the Blue Ridge and Shenandoah trusts as classic examples of the insanity of leverage-based investment. The trusts, he wrote, were a major cause of the market’s historic crash; in today’s dollars, the losses the bank suffered totaled $475 billion. “It is difficult not to marvel at the imagination which was implicit in this gargantuan insanity,” Galbraith observed, sounding like Keith Olbermann in an ascot. “If there must be madness, something may be said for having it on a heroic scale.” 

Bubble #2: Tech Stocks 

Fast-forward about 65 years. Goldman not only survived the crash that wiped out so many of the investors it duped, it went on to become the chief underwriter to the country’s wealthiest and most powerful corporations. Thanks to Sidney Weinberg, who rose from the rank of janitor’s assistant to head the firm, Goldman became the pioneer of the initial public offering, one of the principal and most lucrative means by which companies raise money. During the 1970s and 1980s, Goldman may not have been the planet-eating Death Star of political influence it is today, but it was a top-drawer firm that had a reputation for attracting the very smartest talent on the Street.

It also, oddly enough, had a reputation for relatively solid ethics and a patient approach to investment that shunned the fast buck; its executives were trained to adopt the firm’s mantra, “longterm greedy.” One former Goldman banker who left the firm in the early Nineties recalls seeing his superiors give up a very profitable deal on the grounds that it was a long-term loser. “We gave back money to ‘grownup’ corporate clients who had made bad deals with us,” he says. “Everything we did was legal and fair — but ‘longterm greedy’ said we didn’t want to make such a profit at the clients’ collective expense that we spoiled the marketplace.”

But then, something happened. It’s hard to say what it was exactly; it might have been the fact that Goldman’s co-chairman in the early Nineties, Robert Rubin, followed Bill Clinton to the White House, where he directed the National Economic Council and eventually became Treasury secretary. While the American media fell in love with the story line of a pair of baby-boomer, Sixties-child, Fleetwood Mac yuppies nesting in the White House, it also nursed an undisguised crush on Rubin, who was hyped as without a doubt the smartest person ever to walk the face of the Earth, with Newton, Einstein, Mozart and Kant running far behind.

Rubin was the proto-typical Goldman banker. He was probably born in a $4,000 suit, he had a face that seemed permanently frozen just short of an apology for being so much smarter than you, and he exuded a Spock-like, emotion-neutral exterior; the only human feeling you could imagine him experiencing was a nightmare about being forced to fly coach. It became almost a national clichè that whatever Rubin thought was best for the economy — a phenomenon that reached its apex in 1999, when Rubin appeared on the cover of Time with his Treasury deputy, Larry Summers, and Fed chief Alan Greenspan under the headline The Committee to Save the World. And “what Rubin thought,” mostly, was that the American economy, and in particular the financial markets, were over-regulated and needed to be set free. During his tenure at Treasury, the Clinton White House made a series of moves that would have drastic consequences for the global economy — beginning with Rubin’s complete and total failure to regulate his old firm during its first mad dash for obscene short-term profits.

The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren’t much more than potfueled ideas scrawled on napkins by up-too-late bong-smokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for mega-millions. It was as if banks like Goldman were wrapping ribbons around watermelons, tossing them out 50-story windows and opening the phones for bids. In this game you were a winner only if you took your money out before the melon hit the pavement.

It sounds obvious now, but what the average investor didn’t know at the time was that the banks had changed the rules of the game, making the deals look better than they actually were. They did this by setting up what was, in reality, a two-tiered investment system — one for the insiders who knew the real numbers, and another for the lay investor who was invited to chase soaring prices the banks themselves knew were irrational. While Goldman’s later pattern would be to capitalize on changes in the regulatory environment, its key innovation in the Internet years was to abandon its own industry’s standards of quality control.

“Since the Depression, there were strict underwriting guidelines that Wall Street adhered to when taking a company public,” says one prominent hedge-fund manager. “The company had to be in business for a minimum of five years, and it had to show profitability for three consecutive years. But Wall Street took these guidelines and threw them in the trash.” Goldman completed the snow job by pumping up the sham stocks: “Their analysts were out there saying Bullshit.com is worth $100 a share.”

The problem was, nobody told investors that the rules had changed. “Everyone on the inside knew,” the manager says. “Bob Rubin sure as hell knew what the underwriting standards were. They’d been intact since the 1930s.”

Jay Ritter, a professor of finance at the University of Florida who specializes in IPOs, says banks like Goldman knew full well that many of the public offerings they were touting would never make a dime. “In the early Eighties, the major underwriters insisted on three years of profitability. Then it was one year, then it was a quarter. By the time of the Internet bubble, they were not even requiring profitability in the foreseeable future.”

Goldman has denied that it changed its underwriting standards during the Internet years, but its own statistics belie the claim. Just as it did with the investment trust in the 1920s, Goldman started slow and finished crazy in the Internet years. After it took a little-known company with weak financials called Yahoo! public in 1996, once the tech boom had already begun, Goldman quickly became the IPO king of the Internet era. Of the 24 companies it took public in 1997, a third were losing money at the time of the IPO. In 1999, at the height of the boom, it took 47 companies public, including stillborns like Webvan and eToys, investment offerings that were in many ways the modern equivalents of Blue Ridge and Shenandoah. The following year, it underwrote 18 companies in the first four months, 14 of which were money losers at the time. As a leading underwriter of Internet stocks during the boom, Goldman provided profits far more volatile than those of its competitors: In 1999, the average Goldman IPO leapt 281 percent above its offering price, compared to the Wall Street average of 181 percent.

How did Goldman achieve such extraordinary results? One answer is that they used a practice called “laddering,” which is just a fancy way of saying they manipulated the share price of new offerings. Here’s how it works: Say you’re Goldman Sachs, and Bullshit.com comes to you and asks you to take their company public. You agree on the usual terms: You’ll price the stock, determine how many shares should be released and take the Bullshit.com CEO on a “road show” to schmooze investors, all in exchange for a substantial fee (typically six to seven percent of the amount raised). You then promise your best clients the right to buy big chunks of the IPO at the low offering price — let’s say Bullshit.com’s starting share price is $15 — in exchange for a promise that they will buy more shares later on the open market. That seemingly simple demand gives you inside knowledge of the IPO’s future, knowledge that wasn’t disclosed to the daytrader schmucks who only had the prospectus to go by: You know that certain of your clients who bought X amount of shares at $15 are also going to buy Y more shares at $20 or $25, virtually guaranteeing that the price is going to go to $25 and beyond. In this way, Goldman could artificially jack up the new company’s price, which of course was to the bank’s benefit — a six percent fee of a $500 million IPO is serious money.

Goldman was repeatedly sued by shareholders for engaging in laddering in a variety of Internet IPOs, including Webvan and NetZero. The deceptive practices also caught the attention of Nicholas Maier, the syndicate manager of Cramer & Co., the hedge fund run at the time by the now-famous chattering television asshole Jim Cramer, himself a Goldman alum. Maier told the SEC that while working for Cramer between 1996 and 1998, he was repeatedly forced to engage in laddering practices during IPO deals with Goldman.

“Goldman, from what I witnessed, they were the worst perpetrator,” Maier said. “They totally fueled the bubble. And it’s specifically that kind of behavior that has caused the market crash. They built these stocks upon an illegal foundation — manipulated up — and ultimately, it really was the small person who ended up buying in.” In 2005, Goldman agreed to pay $40 million for its laddering violations — a puny penalty relative to the enormous profits it made. (Goldman, which has denied wrongdoing in all of the cases it has settled, refused to respond to questions for this story.)

Another practice Goldman engaged in during the Internet boom was “spinning,” better known as bribery. Here the investment bank would offer the executives of the newly public company shares at extra-low prices, in exchange for future underwriting business. Banks that engaged in spinning would then undervalue the initial offering price — ensuring that those “hot” opening-price shares it had handed out to insiders would be more likely to rise quickly, supplying bigger first-day rewards for the chosen few. So instead of Bullshit.com opening at $20, the bank would approach the Bullshit.com CEO and offer him a million shares of his own company at $18 in exchange for future business — effectively robbing all of Bullshit’s new shareholders by diverting cash that should have gone to the company’s bottom line into the private bank account of the company’s CEO.

In one case, Goldman allegedly gave a multimillion-dollar special offering to eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who later joined Goldman’s board, in exchange for future i-banking business. According to a report by the House Financial Services Committee in 2002, Goldman gave special stock offerings to executives in 21 companies that it took public, including Yahoo! Co-founder Jerry Yang and two of the great slithering villains of the financial-scandal age — Tyco’s Dennis Kozlowski and Enron’s Ken Lay. Goldman angrily denounced the report as “an egregious distortion of the facts” — shortly before paying $110 million to settle an investigation into spinning and other manipulations launched by New York state regulators. “The spinning of hot IPO shares was not a harmless corporate perk,” then-attorney general Eliot Spitzer said at the time. “Instead, it was an integral part of a fraudulent scheme to win new investment-banking business.”

Such practices conspired to turn the Internet bubble into one of the greatest financial disasters in world history: Some $5 trillion of wealth was wiped out on the NASDAQ alone. But the real problem wasn’t the money that was lost by shareholders, it was the money gained by investment bankers, who received hefty bonuses for tampering with the market. Instead of teaching Wall Street a lesson that bubbles always deflate, the Internet years demonstrated to bankers that in the age of freely flowing capital and publicly owned financial companies, bubbles are incredibly easy to inflate, and individual bonuses are actually bigger when the mania and the irrationality are greater.

Nowhere was this truer than at Goldman. Between 1999 and 2002, the firm paid out $28.5 billion in compensation and benefits — an average of roughly $350,000 a year per employee. Those numbers are important because the key legacy of the Internet boom is that the economy is now driven in large part by the pursuit of the enormous salaries and bonuses that such bubbles make possible. Goldman’s mantra of “long-term greedy” vanished into thin air as the game became about getting your check before the melon hit the pavement.

The market was no longer a rationally managed place to grow real, profitable businesses: It was a huge ocean of Someone Else’s Money where bankers hauled in vast sums through whatever means necessary and tried to convert that money into bonuses and payouts as quickly as possible. If you laddered and spun 50 Internet IPOs that went bust within a year, so what? By the time the Securities and Exchange Commission got around to fining your firm $110 million, the yacht you bought with your IPO bonuses was already six years old. Besides, you were probably out of Goldman by then, running the U.S. Treasury or maybe the state of New Jersey. (One of the truly comic moments in the history of America’s recent financial collapse came when Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey, who ran Goldman from 1994 to 1999 and left with $320 million in IPO-fattened stock, insisted in 2002 that “I’ve never even heard the term ‘laddering’ before.”)

For a bank that paid out $7 billion a year in salaries, $110 million fines issued half a decade late were something far less than a deterrent — they were a joke. Once the Internet bubble burst, Goldman had no incentive to reassess its new, profit-driven strategy; it just searched around for another bubble to inflate. As it turns out, it had one ready, thanks in large part to Rubin. 

Bubble #3: The Housing Craze

Goldman’s role in the sweeping global disaster that was the housing bubble is not hard to trace. Here again, the basic trick was a decline in underwriting standards, although in this case the standards weren’t in IPOs but in mortgages. By now almost everyone knows that for decades mortgage dealers insisted that home buyers be able to produce a down payment of 10 percent or more, show a steady income and good credit rating, and possess a real first and last name. Then, at the dawn of the new millennium, they suddenly threw all that shit out the window and started writing mortgages on the backs of napkins to cocktail waitresses and excons carrying five bucks and a Snickers bar.

None of that would have been possible without investment bankers like Goldman, who created vehicles to package those shitty mortgages and sell them en masse to unsuspecting insurance companies and pension funds. This created a mass market for toxic debt that would never have existed before; in the old days, no bank would have wanted to keep some addict ex-con’s mortgage on its books, knowing how likely it was to fail. You can’t write these mortgages, in other words, unless you can sell them to someone who doesn’t know what they are.

Goldman used two methods to hide the mess they were selling. First, they bundled hundreds of different mortgages into instruments called Collateralized Debt Obligations. Then they sold investors on the idea that, because a bunch of those mortgages would turn out to be OK, there was no reason to worry so much about the shitty ones: The CDO, as a whole, was sound. Thus, junkrated mortgages were turned into AAArated investments. Second, to hedge its own bets, Goldman got companies like AIG to provide insurance — known as creditdefault swaps — on the CDOs. The swaps were essentially a racetrack bet between AIG and Goldman: Goldman is betting the excons will default, AIG is betting they won’t.

There was only one problem with the deals: All of the wheeling and dealing represented exactly the kind of dangerous speculation that federal regulators are supposed to rein in. Derivatives like CDOs and credit swaps had already caused a series of serious financial calamities: Procter & Gamble and Gibson Greetings both lost fortunes, and Orange County, California, was forced to default in 1994. A report that year by the Government Accountability Office recommended that such financial instruments be tightly regulated — and in 1998, the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a woman named Brooksley Born, agreed. That May, she circulated a letter to business leaders and the Clinton administration suggesting that banks be required to provide greater disclosure in derivatives trades, and maintain reserves to cushion against losses.

More regulation wasn’t exactly what Goldman had in mind. “The banks go crazy — they want it stopped,” says Michael Greenberger, who worked for Born as director of trading and markets at the CFTC and is now a law professor at the University of Maryland. “Greenspan, Summers, Rubin and [SEC chief Arthur] Levitt want it stopped.”

Clinton’s reigning economic foursome — “especially Rubin,” according to Greenberger — called Born in for a meeting and pleaded their case. She refused to back down, however, and continued to push for more regulation of the derivatives. Then, in June 1998, Rubin went public to denounce her move, eventually recommending that Congress strip the CFTC of its regulatory authority. In 2000, on its last day in session, Congress passed the now-notorious Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which had been inserted into an 11,000-page spending bill at the last minute, with almost no debate on the floor of the Senate. Banks were now free to trade default swaps with impunity.

But the story didn’t end there. AIG, a major purveyor of default swaps, approached the New York State Insurance Department in 2000 and asked whether default swaps would be regulated as insurance. At the time, the office was run by one Neil Levin, a former Goldman vice president, who decided against regulating the swaps. Now freed to underwrite as many housingbased securities and buy as much credit-default protection as it wanted, Goldman went berserk with lending lust. By the peak of the housing boom in 2006, Goldman was underwriting $76.5 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities — a third of which were subprime — much of it to institutional investors like pensions and insurance companies. And in these massive issues of real estate were vast swamps of crap.

Take one $494 million issue that year, GSAMP Trust 2006S3. Many of the mortgages belonged to secondmortgage borrowers, and the average equity they had in their homes was 0.71 percent. Moreover, 58 percent of the loans included little or no documentation — no names of the borrowers, no addresses of the homes, just zip codes. Yet both of the major ratings agencies, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, rated 93 percent of the issue as investment grade. Moody’s projected that less than 10 percent of the loans would default. In reality, 18 percent of the mortgages were in default within 18 months.

Not that Goldman was personally at any risk. The bank might be taking all these hideous, completely irresponsible mortgages from beneath-gangster-status firms like Countrywide and selling them off to municipalities and pensioners — old people, for God’s sake — pretending the whole time that it wasn’t gradeD horseshit. But even as it was doing so, it was taking short positions in the same market, in essence betting against the same crap it was selling. Even worse, Goldman bragged about it in public. “The mortgage sector continues to be challenged,” David Viniar, the bank’s chief financial officer, boasted in 2007. “As a result, we took significant markdowns on our long inventory positions … However, our risk bias in that market was to be short, and that net short position was profitable.” In other words, the mortgages it was selling were for chumps. The real money was in betting against those same mortgages.

“That’s how audacious these assholes are,” says one hedgefund manager. “At least with other banks, you could say that they were just dumb — they believed what they were selling, and it blew them up. Goldman knew what it was doing.”

I ask the manager how it could be that selling something to customers that you’re actually betting against — particularly when you know more about the weaknesses of those products than the customer — doesn’t amount to securities fraud.

“It’s exactly securities fraud,” he says. “It’s the heart of securities fraud.”

Eventually, lots of aggrieved investors agreed. In a virtual repeat of the Internet IPO craze, Goldman was hit with a wave of lawsuits after the collapse of the housing bubble, many of which accused the bank of withholding pertinent information about the quality of the mortgages it issued. New York state regulators are suing Goldman and 25 other underwriters for selling bundles of crappy Countrywide mortgages to city and state pension funds, which lost as much as $100 million in the investments. Massachusetts also investigated Goldman for similar misdeeds, acting on behalf of 714 mortgage holders who got stuck holding predatory loans. But once again, Goldman got off virtually scot-free, staving off prosecution by agreeing to pay a paltry $60 million — about what the bank’s CDO division made in a day and a half during the real estate boom.

The effects of the housing bubble are well known — it led more or less directly to the collapse of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and AIG, whose toxic portfolio of credit swaps was in significant part composed of the insurance that banks like Goldman bought against their own housing portfolios. In fact, at least $13 billion of the taxpayer money given to AIG in the bailout ultimately went to Goldman, meaning that the bank made out on the housing bubble twice: It fucked the investors who bought their horseshit CDOs by betting against its own crappy product, then it turned around and fucked the taxpayer by making him pay off those same bets.

And once again, while the world was crashing down all around the bank, Goldman made sure it was doing just fine in the compensation department. In 2006, the firm’s payroll jumped to $16.5 billion — an average of $622,000 per employee. As a Goldman spokesman explained, “We work very hard here.”

But the best was yet to come. While the collapse of the housing bubble sent most of the financial world fleeing for the exits, or to jail, Goldman boldly doubled down — and almost single-handedly created yet another bubble, one the world still barely knows the firm had anything to do with. 

Bubble #4: $4 a Gallon 

By the beginning of 2008, the financial world was in turmoil. Wall Street had spent the past two and a half decades producing one scandal after another, which didn’t leave much to sell that wasn’t tainted. The terms junk bond, IPO, subprime mortgage and other once-hot financial fare were now firmly associated in the public’s mind with scams; the terms credit swaps and CDOs were about to join them. The credit markets were in crisis, and the mantra that had sustained the fantasy economy throughout the Bush years — the notion that housing prices never go down — was now a fully exploded myth, leaving the Street clamoring for a new bullshit paradigm to sling.

Where to go? With the public reluctant to put money in anything that felt like a paper investment, the Street quietly moved the casino to the physical-commodities market — stuff you could touch: corn, coffee, cocoa, wheat and, above all, energy commodities, especially oil. In conjunction with a decline in the dollar, the credit crunch and the housing crash caused a “flight to commodities.” Oil futures in particular skyrocketed, as the price of a single barrel went from around $60 in the middle of 2007 to a high of $147 in the summer of 2008.

That summer, as the presidential campaign heated up, the accepted explanation for why gasoline had hit $4.11 a gallon was that there was a problem with the world oil supply. In a classic example of how Republicans and Democrats respond to crises by engaging in fierce exchanges of moronic irrelevancies, John McCain insisted that ending the moratorium on offshore drilling would be “very helpful in the short term,” while Barack Obama in typical liberal-arts yuppie style argued that federal investment in hybrid cars was the way out.

But it was all a lie. While the global supply of oil will eventually dry up, the shortterm flow has actually been increasing. In the six months before prices spiked, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the world oil supply rose from 85.24 million barrels a day to 85.72 million. Over the same period, world oil demand dropped from 86.82 million barrels a day to 86.07 million. Not only was the shortterm supply of oil rising, the demand for it was falling — which, in classic economic terms, should have brought prices at the pump down.

So what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the oncesolid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.

As is so often the case, there had been a Depression-era law in place designed specifically to prevent this sort of thing. The commodities market was designed in large part to help farmers: A grower concerned about future price drops could enter into a contract to sell his corn at a certain price for delivery later on, which made him worry less about building up stores of his crop. When no one was buying corn, the farmer could sell to a middleman known as a “traditional speculator,” who would store the grain and sell it later, when demand returned. That way, someone was always there to buy from the farmer, even when the market temporarily had no need for his crops.

In 1936, however, Congress recognized that there should never be more speculators in the market than real producers and consumers. If that happened, prices would be affected by something other than supply and demand, and price manipulations would ensue. A new law empowered the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — the very same body that would later try and fail to regulate credit swaps — to place limits on speculative trades in commodities. As a result of the CFTC’s oversight, peace and harmony reigned in the commodities markets for more than 50 years.

All that changed in 1991 when, unbeknownst to almost everyone in the world, a Goldman-owned commodities-trading subsidiary called J. Aron wrote to the CFTC and made an unusual argument. Farmers with big stores of corn, Goldman argued, weren’t the only ones who needed to hedge their risk against future price drops — Wall Street dealers who made big bets on oil prices also needed to hedge their risk, because, well, they stood to lose a lot too.

This was complete and utter crap — the 1936 law, remember, was specifically designed to maintain distinctions between people who were buying and selling real tangible stuff and people who were trading in paper alone. But the CFTC, amazingly, bought Goldman’s argument. It issued the bank a free pass, called the “Bona Fide Hedging” exemption, allowing Goldman’s subsidiary to call itself a physical hedger and escape virtually all limits placed on speculators. In the years that followed, the commission would quietly issue 14 similar exemptions to other companies.

Now Goldman and other banks were free to drive more investors into the commodities markets, enabling speculators to place increasingly big bets. That 1991 letter from Goldman more or less directly led to the oil bubble in 2008, when the number of speculators in the market — driven there by fear of the falling dollar and the housing crash — finally overwhelmed the real physical suppliers and consumers. By 2008, at least three quarters of the activity on the commodity exchanges was speculative, according to a congressional staffer who studied the numbers — and that’s likely a conservative estimate. By the middle of last summer, despite rising supply and a drop in demand, we were paying $4 a gallon every time we pulled up to the pump.

What is even more amazing is that the letter to Goldman, along with most of the other trading exemptions, was handed out more or less in secret. “I was the head of the division of trading and markets, and Brooksley Born was the chair of the CFTC,” says Greenberger, “and neither of us knew this letter was out there.” In fact, the letters only came to light by accident. Last year, a staffer for the House Energy and Commerce Committee just happened to be at a briefing when officials from the CFTC made an offhand reference to the exemptions.

“I had been invited to a briefing the commission was holding on energy,” the staffer recounts. “And suddenly in the middle of it, they start saying, ‘Yeah, we’ve been issuing these letters for years now.’ I raised my hand and said, ‘Really? You issued a letter? Can I see it?’ And they were like, ‘Duh, duh.’ So we went back and forth, and finally they said, ‘We have to clear it with Goldman Sachs.’ I’m like, ‘What do you mean, you have to clear it with Goldman Sachs?’”

The CFTC cited a rule that prohibited it from releasing any information about a company’s current position in the market. But the staffer’s request was about a letter that had been issued 17 years earlier. It no longer had anything to do with Goldman’s current position. What’s more, Section 7 of the 1936 commodities law gives Congress the right to any information it wants from the commission. Still, in a classic example of how complete Goldman’s capture of government is, the CFTC waited until it got clearance from the bank before it turned the letter over.

Armed with the semi-secret government exemption, Goldman had become the chief designer of a giant commodities betting parlor. Its Goldman Sachs Commodities Index — which tracks the prices of 24 major commodities but is overwhelmingly weighted toward oil — became the place where pension funds and insurance companies and other institutional investors could make massive longterm bets on commodity prices. Which was all well and good, except for a couple of things. One was that index speculators are mostly “long only” bettors, who seldom if ever take short positions — meaning they only bet on prices to rise. While this kind of behavior is good for a stock market, it’s terrible for commodities, because it continually forces prices upward. “If index speculators took short positions as well as long ones, you’d see them pushing prices both up and down,” says Michael Masters, a hedgefund manager who has helped expose the role of investment banks in the manipulation of oil prices. “But they only push prices in one direction: up.”

Complicating matters even further was the fact that Goldman itself was cheerleading with all its might for an increase in oil prices. In the beginning of 2008, Arjun Murti, a Goldman analyst, hailed as an “oracle of oil” by The New York Times, predicted a “super spike” in oil prices, forecasting a rise to $200 a barrel. At the time Goldman was heavily invested in oil through its commoditiestrading subsidiary, J. Aron; it also owned a stake in a major oil refinery in Kansas, where it warehoused the crude it bought and sold. Even though the supply of oil was keeping pace with demand, Murti continually warned of disruptions to the world oil supply, going so far as to broadcast the fact that he owned two hybrid cars. High prices, the bank insisted, were somehow the fault of the piggish American consumer; in 2005, Goldman analysts insisted that we wouldn’t know when oil prices would fall until we knew “when American consumers will stop buying gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and instead seek fuel-efficient alternatives.”

But it wasn’t the consumption of real oil that was driving up prices — it was the trade in paper oil. By the summer of 2008, in fact, commodities speculators had bought and stockpiled enough oil futures to fill 1.1 billion barrels of crude, which meant that speculators owned more future oil on paper than there was real, physical oil stored in all of the country’s commercial storage tanks and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve combined. It was a repeat of both the Internet craze and the housing bubble, when Wall Street jacked up presentday profits by selling suckers shares of a fictional fantasy future of endlessly rising prices.

In what was by now a painfully familiar pattern, the oil-commodities melon hit the pavement hard in the summer of 2008, causing a massive loss of wealth; crude prices plunged from $147 to $33. Once again the big losers were ordinary people. The pensioners whose funds invested in this crap got massacred: CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, had $1.1 billion in commodities when the crash came. And the damage didn’t just come from oil. Soaring food prices driven by the commodities bubble led to catastrophes across the planet, forcing an estimated 100 million people into hunger and sparking food riots throughout the Third World.

Now oil prices are rising again: They shot up 20 percent in the month of May and have nearly doubled so far this year. Once again, the problem is not supply or demand. “The highest supply of oil in the last 20 years is now,” says Rep. Bart Stupak, a Democrat from Michigan who serves on the House energy committee. “Demand is at a 10-year low. And yet prices are up.”

Asked why politicians continue to harp on things like drilling or hybrid cars, when supply and demand have nothing to do with the high prices, Stupak shakes his head. “I think they just don’t understand the problem very well,” he says. “You can’t explain it in 30 seconds, so politicians ignore it.” 

Bubble #5: Rigging the Bailout 

After the oil bubble collapsed last fall, there was no new bubble to keep things humming — this time, the money seems to be really gone, like worldwide-depression gone. So the financial safari has moved elsewhere, and the big game in the hunt has become the only remaining pool of dumb, unguarded capital left to feed upon: taxpayer money. Here, in the biggest bailout in history, is where Goldman Sachs really started to flex its muscle.

It began in September of last year, when then-Treasury secretary Paulson made a momentous series of decisions. Although he had already engineered a rescue of Bear Stearns a few months before and helped bail out quasi-private lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Paulson elected to let Lehman Brothers — one of Goldman’s last real competitors — collapse without intervention. (“Goldman’s superhero status was left intact,” says market analyst Eric Salzman, “and an investment-banking competitor, Lehman, goes away.”) The very next day, Paulson greenlighted a massive, $85 billion bailout of AIG, which promptly turned around and repaid $13 billion it owed to Goldman. Thanks to the rescue effort, the bank ended up getting paid in full for its bad bets: By contrast, retired auto workers awaiting the Chrysler bailout will be lucky to receive 50 cents for every dollar they are owed.

Immediately after the AIG bailout, Paulson announced his federal bailout for the financial industry, a $700 billion plan called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and put a heretofore unknown 35yearold Goldman banker named Neel Kashkari in charge of administering the funds. In order to qualify for bailout monies, Goldman announced that it would convert from an investment bank to a bankholding company, a move that allows it access not only to $10 billion in TARP funds, but to a whole galaxy of less conspicuous, publicly backed funding — most notably, lending from the discount window of the Federal Reserve. By the end of March, the Fed will have lent or guaranteed at least $8.7 trillion under a series of new bailout programs — and thanks to an obscure law allowing the Fed to block most congressional audits, both the amounts and the recipients of the monies remain almost entirely secret.

Converting to a bank-holding company has other benefits as well: Goldman’s primary supervisor is now the New York Fed, whose chairman at the time of its announcement was Stephen Friedman, a former co-chairman of Goldman Sachs. Friedman was technically in violation of Federal Reserve policy by remaining on the board of Goldman even as he was supposedly regulating the bank; in order to rectify the problem, he applied for, and got, a conflict-of-interest waiver from the government. Friedman was also supposed to divest himself of his Goldman stock after Goldman became a bankholding company, but thanks to the waiver, he was allowed to go out and buy 52,000 additional shares in his old bank, leaving him $3 million richer. Friedman stepped down in May, but the man now in charge of supervising Goldman — New York Fed president William Dudley — is yet another former Goldmanite.

The collective message of all this — the AIG bailout, the swift approval for its bankholding conversion, the TARP funds — is that when it comes to Goldman Sachs, there isn’t a free market at all. The government might let other players on the market die, but it simply will not allow Goldman to fail under any circumstances. Its edge in the market has suddenly become an open declaration of supreme privilege. “In the past it was an implicit advantage,” says Simon Johnson, an economics professor at MIT and former official at the International Monetary Fund, who compares the bailout to the crony capitalism he has seen in Third World countries. “Now it’s more of an explicit advantage.”

Once the bailouts were in place, Goldman went right back to business as usual, dreaming up impossibly convoluted schemes to pick the American carcass clean of its loose capital. One of its first moves in the postbailout era was to quietly push forward the calendar it uses to report its earnings, essentially wiping December 2008 — with its $1.3 billion in pretax losses — off the books. At the same time, the bank announced a highly suspicious $1.8 billion profit for the first quarter of 2009 — which apparently included a large chunk of money funneled to it by taxpayers via the AIG bailout. “They cooked those first-quarter results six ways from Sunday,” says one hedgefund manager. “They hid the losses in the orphan month and called the bailout money profit.”

Two more numbers stand out from that stunning first-quarter turnaround. The bank paid out an astonishing $4.7 billion in bonuses and compensation in the first three months of this year, an 18 percent increase over the first quarter of 2008. It also raised $5 billion by issuing new shares almost immediately after releasing its first-quarter results. Taken together, the numbers show that Goldman essentially borrowed a $5 billion salary payout for its executives in the middle of the global economic crisis it helped cause, using half-baked accounting to reel in investors, just months after receiving billions in a taxpayer bailout.

Even more amazing, Goldman did it all right before the government announced the results of its new “stress test” for banks seeking to repay TARP money — suggesting that Goldman knew exactly what was coming. The government was trying to carefully orchestrate the repayments in an effort to prevent further trouble at banks that couldn’t pay back the money right away. But Goldman blew off those concerns, brazenly flaunting its insider status. “They seemed to know everything that they needed to do before the stress test came out, unlike everyone else, who had to wait until after,” says Michael Hecht, a managing director of JMP Securities. “The government came out and said, ‘To pay back TARP, you have to issue debt of at least five years that is not insured by FDIC — which Goldman Sachs had already done, a week or two before.”

And here’s the real punch line. After playing an intimate role in four historic bubble catastrophes, after helping $5 trillion in wealth disappear from the NASDAQ, after pawning off thousands of toxic mortgages on pensioners and cities, after helping to drive the price of gas up to $4 a gallon and to push 100 million people around the world into hunger, after securing tens of billions of taxpayer dollars through a series of bailouts overseen by its former CEO, what did Goldman Sachs give back to the people of the United States in 2008?

Fourteen million dollars.

That is what the firm paid in taxes in 2008, an effective tax rate of exactly one, read it, one percent. The bank paid out $10 billion in compensation and benefits that same year and made a profit of more than $2 billion — yet it paid the Treasury less than a third of what it forked over to CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who made $42.9 million last year.

How is this possible? According to Goldman’s annual report, the low taxes are due in large part to changes in the bank’s “geographic earnings mix.” In other words, the bank moved its money around so that most of its earnings took place in foreign countries with low tax rates. Thanks to our completely fucked corporate tax system, companies like Goldman can ship their revenues offshore and defer taxes on those revenues indefinitely, even while they claim deductions upfront on that same untaxed income. This is why any corporation with an at least occasionally sober accountant can usually find a way to zero out its taxes. A GAO report, in fact, found that between 1998 and 2005, roughly twothirds of all corporations operating in the U.S. paid no taxes at all.

This should be a pitchfork level outrage — but somehow, when Goldman released its post-bailout tax profile, hardly anyone said a word. One of the few to remark on the obscenity was Rep. Lloyd Doggett, a Democrat from Texas who serves on the House Ways and Means Committee. “With the right hand out begging for bailout money,” he said, “the left is hiding it offshore.”

Bubble #6: Global Warning 

Fast-forward to today. It’s early June in Washington, D.C. Barack Obama, a popular young politician whose leading private campaign donor was an investment bank called Goldman Sachs — its employees paid some $981,000 to his campaign — sits in the White House. Having seamlessly navigated the political minefield of the bailout era, Goldman is once again back to its old business, scouting out loopholes in a new government-created market with the aid of a new set of alumni occupying key government jobs.

Gone are Hank Paulson and Neel Kashkari; in their place are Treasury chief of staff Mark Patterson and CFTC chief Gary Gensler, both former Goldmanites. (Gensler was the firm’s cohead of finance.) And instead of credit derivatives or oil futures or mortgage-backed CDOs, the new game in town, the next bubble, is in carbon credits — a booming trillion dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an “environmental plan,” called cap-and-trade.

The new carboncredit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that’s been kind to Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won’t even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in advance.

Here’s how it works: If the bill passes, there will be limits for coal plants, utilities, natural-gas distributors and numerous other industries on the amount of carbon emissions (a.k.a. greenhouse gases) they can produce per year. If the companies go over their allotment, they will be able to buy “allocations” or credits from other companies that have managed to produce fewer emissions. President Obama conservatively estimates that about $646 billion worth of carbon credits will be auctioned in the first seven years; one of his top economic aides speculates that the real number might be twice or even three times that amount.

The feature of this plan that has special appeal to speculators is that the “cap” on carbon will be continually lowered by the government, which means that carbon credits will become more and more scarce with each passing year. Which means that this is a brand new commodities market where the main commodity to be traded is guaranteed to rise in price over time. The volume of this new market will be upwards of a trillion dollars annually; for comparison’s sake, the annual combined revenues of all electricity suppliers in the U.S. total $320 billion.

Goldman wants this bill. The plan is (1) to get in on the ground floor of paradigmshifting legislation, (2) make sure that they’re the profitmaking slice of that paradigm and (3) make sure the slice is a big slice. Goldman started pushing hard for capandtrade long ago, but things really ramped up last year when the firm spent $3.5 million to lobby climate issues. (One of their lobbyists at the time was none other than Patterson, now Treasury chief of staff.) Back in 2005, when Hank Paulson was chief of Goldman, he personally helped author the bank’s environmental policy, a document that contains some surprising elements for a firm that in all other areas has been consistently opposed to any sort of government regulation. Paulson’s report argued that “voluntary action alone cannot solve the climatechange problem.” A few years later, the bank’s carbon chief, Ken Newcombe, insisted that capandtrade alone won’t be enough to fix the climate problem and called for further public investments in research and development. Which is convenient, considering that Goldman made early investments in wind power (it bought a subsidiary called Horizon Wind Energy), renewable diesel (it is an investor in a firm called Changing World Technologies) and solar power (it partnered with BP Solar), exactly the kind of deals that will prosper if the government forces energy producers to use cleaner energy. As Paulson said at the time, “We’re not making those investments to lose money.”

The bank owns a 10 percent stake in the Chicago Climate Exchange, where the carbon credits will be traded. Moreover, Goldman owns a minority stake in Blue Source LLC, a Utahbased firm that sells carbon credits of the type that will be in great demand if the bill passes. Nobel Prize winner Al Gore, who is intimately involved with the planning of cap-and-trade, started up a company called Generation Investment Management with three former bigwigs from Goldman Sachs Asset Management, David Blood, Mark Ferguson and Peter Harris. Their business? Investing in carbon offsets. There’s also a $500 million Green Growth Fund set up by a Goldmanite to invest in greentech … the list goes on and on. Goldman is ahead of the headlines again, just waiting for someone to make it rain in the right spot. Will this market be bigger than the energyfutures market?

“Oh, it’ll dwarf it,” says a former staffer on the House energy committee.

Well, you might say, who cares? If cap-and-trade succeeds, won’t we all be saved from the catastrophe of global warming? Maybe — but capandtrade, as envisioned by Goldman, is really just a carbon tax structured so that private interests collect the revenues. Instead of simply imposing a fixed government levy on carbon pollution and forcing unclean energy producers to pay for the mess they make, cap-and-trade will allow a small tribe of greedy-as-hell Wall Street swine to turn yet another commodities market into a private taxcollection scheme. This is worse than the bailout: It allows the bank to seize taxpayer money before it’s even collected.

“If it’s going to be a tax, I would prefer that Washington set the tax and collect it,” says Michael Masters, the hedgefund director who spoke out against oilfutures speculation. “But we’re saying that Wall Street can set the tax, and Wall Street can collect the tax. That’s the last thing in the world I want. It’s just asinine.”

Cap-and-trade is going to happen. Or, if it doesn’t, something like it will. The moral is the same as for all the other bubbles that Goldman helped create, from 1929 to 2009. In almost every case, the very same bank that behaved recklessly for years, weighing down the system with toxic loans and predatory debt, and accomplishing nothing but massive bonuses for a few bosses, has been rewarded with mountains of virtually free money and government guarantees — while the actual victims in this mess, ordinary taxpayers, are the ones paying for it.

It’s not always easy to accept the reality of what we now routinely allow these people to get away with; there’s a kind of collective denial that kicks in when a country goes through what America has gone through lately, when a people lose as much prestige and status as we have in the past few years. You can’t really register the fact that you’re no longer a citizen of a thriving first-world democracy, that you’re no longer above getting robbed in broad daylight, because like an amputee, you can still sort of feel things that are no longer there.

But this is it. This is the world we live in now. And in this world, some of us have to play by the rules, while others get a note from the principal excusing them from homework till the end of time, plus 10 billion free dollars in a paper bag to buy lunch. It’s a gangster state, running on gangster economics, and even prices can’t be trusted anymore; there are hidden taxes in every buck you pay. And maybe we can’t stop it, but we should at least know where it’s all going. 

Matt Taibbi

Permalink 1 Comment

Next page »